Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Kaos on May 15, 2012, 08:51:30 PM

Title: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Kaos on May 15, 2012, 08:51:30 PM
http://www.thewareaglereader.com/2012/05/auburns-bronze-age-an-incomplete-illustrated-history-of-miss-a-u-tan/

That's what women should look like.  Where are they now?

(http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/ad195/thewareaglereader/TashaBurchardt-1.jpg?t=1337115021)
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Pell City Tiger on May 15, 2012, 09:23:26 PM
Two flaws; she has a manly face (most likely caused by the camera angle), and what in the hell is that goiter looking lump directly below her lady lumps? Excuse my ignorance if those are her ribs. I just got back from the walmarks. None of the women there have rib cages - just doughy stuffing.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: JR4AU on May 15, 2012, 10:09:31 PM
Two flaws; she has a manly face (most likely caused by the camera angle), and what in the hell is that goiter looking lump directly below her lady lumps? Excuse my ignorance if those are her ribs. I just got back from the walmarks. None of the women there have rib cages - just doughy stuffing.

I think it's more the lighting than anything.

I agree with K too.  I especially miss the high wasted bikinis. 
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: AUChizad on May 15, 2012, 10:44:04 PM
This thread, in conjunction to the legions of Kaos posts about 8s, 9s, and 10s that he wouldn't fuck, boggles the mind.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 15, 2012, 10:45:22 PM
This thread, in conjunction to the legions of Kaos posts about 8s, 9s, and 10s that he wouldn't fuck, boggles the mind.

(http://forums.watchuseek.com/attachments/f20/625937d1329168426-how-speedmaster-professional-like-glock-27-you_are_correct_sir.jpg)
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: JR4AU on May 15, 2012, 11:03:15 PM
This thread, in conjunction to the legions of Kaos posts about 8s, 9s, and 10s that he wouldn't fuck, boggles the mind.

I see your point, and I understand it, but there's one you're missing, and cannot get unless you lived in the late 70s/early80s as a teenager. 
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Kaos on May 16, 2012, 01:10:36 AM
I see your point, and I understand it, but there's one you're missing, and cannot get unless you lived in the late 70s/early80s as a teenager.

He has no point.  Women were women in those days.  Full sized women with body parts.  And big hair. 

It's nostalgia.  There was some awesome there in its day.   

Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 08:24:30 AM
He has no point.  Women were women in those days.  Full sized women with body parts.  And big hair. 

It's nostalgia.  There was some awesome there in its day.   

Yeah, he has a point.  Even Chad makes a valid one at times.  It's more than nostalgia too...it's the women you formed your tastes for women on.  They were the same, yet different.  Today, anything over a size 6 is considered chubby, and over a size 10 is considered fat.  Few chics back then had boob jobs, and if they did, they were usually in their late 20s early 30s.  Today, getting a store bought rack for your 16th birthday or HS graduation is common.

But yeah, wimminz were more real then than now, and that's what this generation likes.  We long for the standard of our day.  Guys of our father's age longed for the "real women" like Marylin Monroe, a size 12-14, which would be considered a fucking hog in today's standards.  Women today are also in better shape generally speaking.  I went and watched my best bud's daughter play in the region Softball tourney at Liberty Park last weekend.  Females with that type of athleticism were few and far between in our day.  My bud and I talked about it and could only come up with 3 true female athletes that we went to HS with.  There were 7-10 on his daughter's team alone.

Oh, and just like Snaggie don't miss teh hairy cooch, I don't miss big hair, though I appreciated it in it's day.     
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 09:22:15 AM
Yeah, he has a point.  Even Chad makes a valid one at times.  It's more than nostalgia too...it's the women you formed your tastes for women on.  They were the same, yet different.  Today, anything over a size 6 is considered chubby, and over a size 10 is considered fat.  Few chics back then had boob jobs, and if they did, they were usually in their late 20s early 30s.  Today, getting a store bought rack for your 16th birthday or HS graduation is common.

But yeah, wimminz were more real then than now, and that's what this generation likes.  We long for the standard of our day.  Guys of our father's age longed for the "real women" like Marylin Monroe, a size 12-14, which would be considered a fucking hog in today's standards.  Women today are also in better shape generally speaking.  I went and watched my best bud's daughter play in the region Softball tourney at Liberty Park last weekend.  Females with that type of athleticism were few and far between in our day.  My bud and I talked about it and could only come up with 3 true female athletes that we went to HS with.  There were 7-10 on his daughter's team alone.

Oh, and just like Snaggie don't miss teh hairy cooch, I don't miss big hair, though I appreciated it in it's day.     

Actually have to agree with Chad here. I grew up in a time where women looked a lot like that and it IS nostalgia, but I do not prefer it over the image of women in the 90's (Cindy Crawford) or 00's (Heidi Klum). Liz Hurley, Kate Beckinsale, Jennifer Aniston - love them all. Although I do have an appreciation for Farrah, Marilyn and Christy Brinkley as well. Probably my 2 favorite women from that era are Bo Derek and Jacklyn Smith. They still look good. 
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Kaos on May 16, 2012, 09:49:54 AM
Actually have to agree with Chad here. I grew up in a time where women looked a lot like that and it IS nostalgia, but I do not prefer it over the image of women in the 90's (Cindy Crawford) or 00's (Heidi Klum). Liz Hurley, Kate Beckinsale, Jennifer Aniston - love them all. Although I do have an appreciation for Farrah, Marilyn and Christy Brinkley as well. Probably my 2 favorite women from that era are Bo Derek and Jacklyn Smith. They still look good.

Chizzy isn't taking about Cindy Crawford, Liz Hurley, Kate Beckinsale or Jennifer Aniston.  I've expressed profound appreciation for all of those.  Got nothing against the way women look or have changed over the years.  Charlize Theron is awesome.  He's talking about the average woman on the street.

BTW, Klum can go fuck a goat.  She sickens me. 

Having grown up with that big hair, real body, curves in curvy places look there's just something nice about seeing it again.  Something healthy.  Wasn't meant to imply that women of today are fugly, just that there's something alluring about real natural bodies that don't need to eat a sandwich or two.  Give me that over skeletal Courtney Cox (not pre-2006 Courtney). 

Haven't seen that look in a while and I enjoyed it.  The rest of you dweebs can go back to your grass-shake drinking, celery chewing, vegan bitches. 
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 09:59:17 AM
Chizzy isn't taking about Cindy Crawford, Liz Hurley, Kate Beckinsale or Jennifer Aniston.  I've expressed profound appreciation for all of those.  Got nothing against the way women look or have changed over the years.  Charlize Theron is awesome.  He's talking about the average woman on the street.

BTW, Klum can go fuck a goat.  She sickens me. 

Having grown up with that big hair, real body, curves in curvy places look there's just something nice about seeing it again.  Something healthy.  Wasn't meant to imply that women of today are fugly, just that there's something alluring about real natural bodies that don't need to eat a sandwich or two.  Give me that over skeletal Courtney Cox (not pre-2006 Courtney). 

Haven't seen that look in a while and I enjoyed it.  The rest of you dweebs can go back to your grass-shake drinking, celery chewing, vegan bitches.

THIS!
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Godfather on May 16, 2012, 10:03:49 AM
(http://img.ehowcdn.com/article-new/ehow/images/a04/g3/fk/have-sexy-toes-soft-feet-800x800.jpg)
THIS!
FTFY
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 10:14:56 AM
Chizzy isn't taking about Cindy Crawford, Liz Hurley, Kate Beckinsale or Jennifer Aniston.  I've expressed profound appreciation for all of those.  Got nothing against the way women look or have changed over the years.  Charlize Theron is awesome.  He's talking about the average woman on the street.

BTW, Klum can go fuck a goat.  She sickens me. 

Having grown up with that big hair, real body, curves in curvy places look there's just something nice about seeing it again.  Something healthy.  Wasn't meant to imply that women of today are fugly, just that there's something alluring about real natural bodies that don't need to eat a sandwich or two.  Give me that over skeletal Courtney Cox (not pre-2006 Courtney). 

Haven't seen that look in a while and I enjoyed it.  The rest of you dweebs can go back to your grass-shake drinking, celery chewing, vegan bitches.

Well Klum was fucking a goat, but I heard she is leaving him now.

I think we agree. I love the Jennifer Aniston of 1994-1998 moreso than the one now, although the Aniston of today isn't bad either. She just has sickening good looks to me so she could probably shave her head and look ok. Same with Courtney Cox and Reese Witherspoon on looking better 10 years ago versus now. What the fuck happened to Reese the last 3 years??? She was a southern spunky cutie pie and now she is an aneroxic looking Hollywood vegan type.

Honestly, I think a lot of the change comes from Hollywood. Its supply and demand. They want botoxed, tanning bed, stick figures now.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Townhallsavoy on May 16, 2012, 10:20:38 AM
Scarlett Johanson and Christina Hendricks laugh at this thread.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: AUChizad on May 16, 2012, 10:27:54 AM
Scarlett Johanson and Christina Hendricks laugh at this thread.
GETS IT.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: AUChizad on May 16, 2012, 10:30:41 AM
Scarlett Johanson and Christina Hendricks laugh at this thread.
Kate Upton Dougies as she laughs.

(http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/1011/kateupton.gif)
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 16, 2012, 10:33:32 AM
Scarlett Johanson and Christina Hendricks laugh at this thread.

Most men would pay to watch Christina Hendricks laugh too...
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Saniflush on May 16, 2012, 10:42:38 AM
Most men would pay to watch Christina Hendricks laugh too...

I've liked her since Firefly.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 16, 2012, 10:57:46 AM
Full figured women aren't gone, it's just that there are more "grass-shake drinking, celery chewing, vegan bitches" in the spotlight than there used to be.

The defense submits Exhibits A - D into evidence.

(http://clclt.com/binary/866e/DAI-SalmaHayek-DuskTillDawn-08190421.jpg)(http://media.egotvonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Sof%C3%ADa+Vergara.jpg)
(http://www.publispain.com/blogs/peliculas/uploads/2008/01/jessica-alba-en-la-playa.jpg)(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gI1QGssoAIU/TVZsW_HzDhI/AAAAAAAAApY/JeGWEApd5Ws/s1600/catherine-zeta-jones-01.jpg)
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: wesfau2 on May 16, 2012, 10:58:07 AM
To quote the Geto Boys:

I like bitches
All types of bitches
To take off my shirt
And pull down my  britches.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 11:19:25 AM
To quote the Geto Boys:

I like bitches
All types of bitches
To take off my shirt
And pull down my  britches.

Very eloquently stated and spot on.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 11:22:37 AM
To quote the Geto Boys:

I like bitches
All types of bitches
To take off my shirt
And pull down my  britches.

Very good insight. Excellent critical thinking.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 11:28:14 AM
To quote the Geto Boys:

I like bitches
All types of bitches
To take off my shirt
And pull down my  britches.
Could not have said it no gooder myself.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Godfather on May 16, 2012, 12:20:42 PM
To quote the Geto Boys:

I like bitches
All types of bitches
To take off my shirt
And pull down my  britches.
I prefer Ludacris

I've got hoes..I've got hoes
In different area codes


area codes
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Kaos on May 16, 2012, 12:53:53 PM
Scarlett Johanson and Christina Hendricks laugh at this thread.

Both have been told by "hollywood" that they are too fat.  And I would do them both.  Simultaneously. 

Chizad fails at "getting it"
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: djsimp on May 16, 2012, 01:13:32 PM
Scarlett Johanson

Especially this!
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: RWS on May 16, 2012, 01:28:07 PM
she has a manly face
More than likely the reason she was given a solid 10 in his book.
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 01:29:26 PM
More than likely the reason she was given a solid 10 in his book.

Cue goat fucking pic in 3...2...1...
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: RWS on May 16, 2012, 01:35:09 PM
Cue goat fucking pic in 3...2...1...
I mean, why else did you think I try to aggrivate him?
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Shug Dye on May 16, 2012, 01:42:23 PM
I mean, why else did you think I try to aggrivate him?

To get free spelling lessons?
Title: Re: WER posts something worthwhile
Post by: Saniflush on May 16, 2012, 01:52:57 PM
To get free spelling lessons?


That just happened.