Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Buzz Killington on May 15, 2012, 10:05:29 AM

Title: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 15, 2012, 10:05:29 AM
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2012/05/gene_chizik_says_his_young_tig.html (http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2012/05/gene_chizik_says_his_young_tig.html)

Quote
Gene Chizik says his young Tigers are growing up
Published: Monday, May 14, 2012, 9:24 PM     Updated: Monday, May 14, 2012, 11:26 PM


ORANGE BEACH - If you're looking for a clue as to what might be in store for Auburn in 2012, Tigers coach Gene Chizik would like to direct your attention to the last game of the 2011 season.

"Virginia was a dang good football team," Chizik said of the team Auburn beat 43-24 in the Chick-fil-A Bowl. "We ended the game taking four knees at the 4-yard line or we're going to score 50 points. And that whole game was done and played by young guys.
   
"I'm going to refresh your memory: The sky is falling, we don't have our starting tailback, all the sudden our quarterback gets hurt, and all the sudden we don't have our starting offensive coordinator. But we found a way with our young guys to come back and win that game and win it very decisively in the end. Those are very, very positive things that happened with our football team."
   
Speaking at the Baldwin County Auburn Club's annual meeting in Orange Beach, Chizik said the Tigers will again be young this season, with a roster that he estimated will be 70 percent freshman and sophomores.
   
But the youngsters, many of whom played extensively last season, are growing up, he said. And they'll be pushed by talented newcomers.
   
"We return 16 starters," Chizik said, not including specialists. "But here's the good news: All of those 16 aren't going to be returning starters because they've got young guys behind them that are going to beat them out.
   
"That's the competition we are finally getting to, and it is fun to watch."
   
Joining Chizik in Orange Beach were Aubie, the school's mascot, and Dr. Debbie Shaw, Aubunr's vice president of alumni affairs. The Baldwin County Auburn Club prsented $1,000 scholarships to seven county high school students and another, James Doolittle, received an endowed scholarship from Auburn.
   
Chizik encouraged them all to continue their support of Auburn and assured them "the future is extremely bright."
   
"Our standard is not eight wins. That is not OK," Chizik said. "You've got to go through those growing pains. We're going through them. But those guys are going to be one year older." 
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 10:22:33 AM
What is a starting offensive coordinator? Do we have depth at that position?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 15, 2012, 10:24:06 AM
What is a starting offensive coordinator? Do we have depth at that position?

We roll 5 deep...
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 15, 2012, 11:10:15 AM
You know a $100 bet will net you 5k if we win the BCS.

Just saying
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 11:33:28 AM
You know a $100 bet will net you 5k if we win the BCS.

Just saying

How much did you put down $1000?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 15, 2012, 11:34:59 AM
How much did you put down $1000?

100.00
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 11:37:22 AM
100.00

Big dick playa, swingin from yo knees.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 15, 2012, 11:39:36 AM
I've spent more on something that had less returns.   
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 11:40:02 AM
I've spent more on something that had less returns.

VV?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: War Eagle!!! on May 15, 2012, 11:42:05 AM
I've spent more on something that had less returns.

Less that zero??
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 11:43:05 AM
I gotta job waiting for my graduation
Fifty thou a year will buy a lotta beer
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: AWK on May 15, 2012, 11:58:33 AM
Gold on the ceiling.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: wesfau2 on May 15, 2012, 12:10:27 PM
I gotta job waiting for my graduation
Fifty thou a year will buy a lotta beer

Study nuclear science?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 15, 2012, 12:24:46 PM
Don't masquerade
With the guy in shades, oh-no
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 15, 2012, 12:40:07 PM
Study nuclear science?

I love my classes
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 15, 2012, 12:42:19 PM
Less that zero??


You're not taking entertainment value into account fucko.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 15, 2012, 09:00:26 PM
VV?

Of course I have less returns.  I don't have any returns.  I swallow it all.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 16, 2012, 09:28:22 AM
Of course I have less returns.  I don't have any returns.  I swallow it all.
I heard it stunts your growth.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Shug Dye on May 16, 2012, 11:43:27 AM
Ummm back on topic...any pics of Coach on the beach?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Tiger Wench on May 16, 2012, 12:17:20 PM
Ummm back on topic...any pics of Coach on the beach?

Werd.  I like this new girl.

Focus, people.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 16, 2012, 12:26:02 PM
Werd.  I like this new girl.

Focus, people.

What happen to Ausweet?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 12:32:56 PM
What happen to Ausweet?


I believe she only posts on AUNation/Family now.  It's more her speed anyway,
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 16, 2012, 12:51:48 PM
What happen to Ausweet?

INS.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 01:27:48 PM
INS.

ICE
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 16, 2012, 02:11:14 PM
ICE

I don't deal with immigration law, so this may be a dumb question, but...does INS still exist?  I know they split it into USCIS, CBP, and ICE, and stuck those under the DHS as opposed to the DoJ, but does INS still exist as an entity/service that encompasses those three?  Or is it officially gone and now those three just exist in its place?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 16, 2012, 02:23:52 PM


I believe she only posts on AUNation/Family now.  It's more her speed anyway,

Under what name? I go over there when I am feeling gay and want to read stuff.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 16, 2012, 02:26:56 PM
Under what name? I go over there when I am feeling gay and want to read stuff.

War Tiger
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 02:35:27 PM
I don't deal with immigration law, so this may be a dumb question, but...does INS still exist?  I know they split it into USCIS, CBP, and ICE, and stuck those under the DHS as opposed to the DoJ, but does INS still exist as an entity/service that encompasses those three?  Or is it officially gone and now those three just exist in its place?

As I understand it, they restructured a lot of shit under the DHS umbrella.  But to answer your question, no, INS is no longer, but ICE is the closest thing to it.  CBP and ICE have overlap on the Customs front, but not sure what areas each deals with.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 02:40:58 PM
War Tiger

Warn meter spike in 3...2...1...
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 16, 2012, 02:46:25 PM
As I understand it, they restructured a lot of shit under the DHS umbrella.  But to answer your question, no, INS is no longer, but ICE is the closest thing to it.  CBP and ICE have overlap on the Customs front, but not sure what areas each deals with.

Gotcha.  From the USCIS website, it looks like those three are all separate agencies under the DHS, as links to the ICE and CBP sites are listed as "Non-USCIS Links."

I'm sure splitting responsibilities amongst three separate agencies and having their duties overlap has been absolutely fantastic for efficiency.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Shug Dye on May 16, 2012, 02:51:37 PM
ICE

That's too bad. I heard nothing but good things about her.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 03:05:11 PM
That's too bad. I heard nothing but good things about her.

She was a feisty one, that Sweets
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 03:20:19 PM
What happen to Ausweet?

She retired to other boards.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 16, 2012, 03:21:10 PM
She was a feisty one, that Sweets

Meh.  She was alright.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 16, 2012, 03:23:30 PM
Meh.  She was airtight.

Fixt.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 03:32:58 PM
Meh.  She was alright.

Ive seen better. Take for instance this new chick, Shug.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: wesfau2 on May 16, 2012, 03:34:40 PM
Fixt.

That's a pro move.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 16, 2012, 03:40:47 PM
That's a pro move.

I think you lose amateur status once you accept goods or services....So that would pretty well be every woman from about the age of 15 on.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 16, 2012, 03:44:18 PM
Ive seen better. Take for instance this new chick, Shug.

She's alright but she is no sweet. I have met sweet, and sir she is no sweet.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: GH2001 on May 16, 2012, 03:45:25 PM
She's alright but she is no sweet. I have met sweet, and sir she is no sweet.

That's what I heard.

Of course I've heard more than that.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 16, 2012, 04:00:25 PM
That's what I heard.

Of course I've heard more than that.

Maybe I'll meet shug in Sept-Compare the two, maybe a mena (nevermind)
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Shug Dye on May 16, 2012, 04:08:40 PM
I can see I'm going to have to prove myself. Game on.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: dallaswareagle on May 16, 2012, 04:26:41 PM
I can see I'm going to have to prove myself. Game on.

I can help?

(http://i197.photobucket.com/albums/aa153/dusty-fire/Gifs/tumblr_m0p915Cf4J1rp6sn7o1_500.gif)   
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Shug Dye on May 16, 2012, 04:42:03 PM
We'll see if we can find a wet-T contest during the golf outing.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: djsimp on May 16, 2012, 04:54:43 PM
We'll see if we can find a wet-T contest during the golf outing.

I just picked up the game of golf.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 04:56:48 PM
We'll see if we can find a wet-T contest during the golf outing.

My moobs are outstanding in a wet T.  Firm yet supple to the touch.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 16, 2012, 04:58:05 PM
My moobs are outstanding in a wet T.  Firm yet supple to the touch.

You would give me a run for my money, fo sho.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 16, 2012, 05:22:03 PM
You would give me a run for my money, fo sho.

I know you're just saying that to be nice.  I'm not even in your league.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Vandy Vol on May 16, 2012, 05:34:16 PM
I know you're just saying that to be nice.  I'm not even in your league.

Both of you can be in my league.  Me-ow.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Pell City Tiger on May 16, 2012, 06:31:20 PM


I believe she only posts on AUNation/Family now.  It's more her speed anyway,
That's what I heard. She and that former cheerleader that got her toes sucked by AWK were good friends.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 08:25:47 PM
That's too bad. I heard nothing but good things about her.

Me too!
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: JR4AU on May 16, 2012, 08:32:44 PM
I was content to let this thread go the way it was going, hell its the off season.  But I keep hearing folks refer to this statement on the radio:

Quote
"We return 16 starters," Chizik said, not including specialists. "But here's the good news: All of those 16 aren't going to be returning starters because they've got young guys behind them that are going to beat them out.
   
"That's the competition we are finally getting to, and it is fun to watch."

The optometrist in me says he slipped that right by everyone, and he's telling us Moseley won't be the starter. 

The pissingmest in me says "What the fuck?  Some of that young experienced talent from last season is going to be replaced with younger less physically mature, less experienced talent?"

Anybody else not worry a little about that statement?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Pell City Tiger on May 16, 2012, 08:58:34 PM
I was content to let this thread go the way it was going, hell its the off season.  But I keep hearing folks refer to this statement on the radio:

The optometrist in me says he slipped that right by everyone, and he's telling us Moseley won't be the starter. 

The pissingmest in me says "What the fuck?  Some of that young experienced talent from last season is going to be replaced with younger less physically mature, less experienced talent?"

Anybody else not worry a little about that statement?
Not me, because I'm a frequent Creed reader.

Seriously though, I think we'll see some changes to the lineup - most notably along the line. Position based purely on seniority breeds complacency, and I believe this is what Chizik is trying to avoid with that statement. Hunger breeds improvement, and we need our guys to starve. What he did by saying that was throw some kindling on the fire. The players heard it, I'm sure, and took notice. Those that didn't will be wearing really clean uniforms on Saturdays this fall.

I would be stunned if Moseley is named the starter. Based upon what I saw at A Day, the job belongs to Frazier.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: The Prowler on May 16, 2012, 09:10:55 PM
I was content to let this thread go the way it was going, hell its the off season.  But I keep hearing folks refer to this statement on the radio:

The optometrist in me says he slipped that right by everyone, and he's telling us Moseley won't be the starter. 

The pissingmest in me says "What the fuck?  Some of that young experienced talent from last season is going to be replaced with younger less physically mature, less experienced talent?"

Anybody else not worry a little about that statement?
Yup, I'm not worried about that statement.

If the returning starters are so mature and experienced, then they shouldn't get beat out...they should lead by example, not by letting a Underclassman beat them out. Steel sharpening Steel.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: GH2001 on May 17, 2012, 09:22:16 AM
We'll see if we can find a wet-T contest during the golf outing.

Hmmm, well it looks like my schedule just opened up for that weekend. Funny how that worked out.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Buzz Killington on May 17, 2012, 09:32:40 AM
Hmmm, well it looks like my schedule just opened up for that weekend. Funny how that worked out.

Like I said earlier...attendance record broken.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: AWK on May 17, 2012, 10:29:35 AM
That's what I heard. She and that former cheerleader that got her toes sucked by AWK were good friends.
She asked for it.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Godfather on May 17, 2012, 10:33:13 AM
She asked for it.
Don't make me ban you
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Shug Dye on May 17, 2012, 10:53:38 AM
Don't make me ban you

No, it's true. She went out there with no socks on. She was begging for it.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Saniflush on May 17, 2012, 10:54:37 AM
No, it's true. She went out there with no socks on. She was begging for it.

Exactly.  I mean who doesn't like to suck on a sweaty foot?
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 17, 2012, 11:23:28 AM
When I read that statement from Chizik, I immediately thought of Sullen and Slade getting beat out by Westerman and Robinson or Miller or any of the talented freshmen coming in.  Or, it could be Robenson Therezie replacing any number of last years starting DB's. 

We rollin' baby....5 deep.
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Townhallsavoy on May 17, 2012, 03:05:52 PM
When I read that statement from Chizik, I immediately thought of Sullen and Slade getting beat out by Westerman and Robinson or Miller or any of the talented freshmen coming in.  Or, it could be Robenson Therezie replacing any number of last years starting DB's. 

We rollin' baby....5 deep.

But is that intellectually honest?  After spending a few seconds punching random numbers, I've discovered that Auburn is actually rolling 4.6 deep.  That number is respectable but by no means something to brag about. 
Title: Re: Chizik says to get out the shades!
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 17, 2012, 03:12:17 PM
But is that intellectually honest?  After spending a few seconds punching random numbers, I've discovered that Auburn is actually rolling 4.6 deep.  That number is respectable but by no means something to brag about.

I was counting walk-ons so the number is actually 5.37 that we rollin'.  I didn't want to overstate it so I rounded down.