Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Kaos on May 08, 2012, 01:53:16 PM

Title: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Kaos on May 08, 2012, 01:53:16 PM
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/05/lsu-fan-suing-alabama-man-for-post-bcs-video/

LSU fan sues teabag douchebag. 
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: GH2001 on May 08, 2012, 02:49:40 PM
http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/05/05/lsu-fan-suing-alabama-man-for-post-bcs-video/

LSU fan sues teabag douchebag.

I usually don't like people who post to articles online but one of the posts under this one was spot on. They can use the word "allegedly" all they want, but there is a video of the shithead rubbing his sack on another dude's face - over and over. He did that.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: bird35 on May 08, 2012, 03:50:35 PM
I usually don't like people who post to articles online but one of the posts under this one was spot on. They can use the word "allegedly" all they want, but there is a video of the shoothead rubbing his sack on another dude's face - over and over. He did that.

You mean an "alleged" video
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: GH2001 on May 08, 2012, 03:52:42 PM
You mean an "alleged" video

And then there is all of the people who witnessed it, and he himself admitted it, apologized and turned himself into police, nevermind the video...so yeah, alleged.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Townhallsavoy on May 08, 2012, 04:39:26 PM
You mean an "alleged" video

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ndGoXyIvrcg/T2uwWMfkSII/AAAAAAAACaw/n1EJBvrJs_I/s1600/HENRY_FONDA_12_ANGRY_MEN.jpg)
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Godfather on May 08, 2012, 04:45:42 PM
I for one no longer want to live in a world where a man can rub his balls on another man and then be sued for it.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: JR4AU on May 08, 2012, 09:40:09 PM
I usually don't like people who post to articles online but one of the posts under this one was spot on. They can use the word "allegedly" all they want, but there is a video of the shithead rubbing his sack on another dude's face - over and over. He did that.

Don't make me go all lawyer up in this bitch!
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: The Prowler on May 09, 2012, 04:31:26 AM
Sue that fucker for everything...take the Trailer, take the freezer in the back yard (with the dead carcass, of whatever, in it), take the 89 Camaro that runs (sometimes), take all of his Bahr Bryant and Nick Sabben pictures, take all of the Daniel Moore photos (even the Illegal Prothro Catch against USM that had to be forfeited, therefore that game never happened) and take all of the other memorabilia crap that's all over the house including his bama bath robe and slippers.

Then record you burning all of the photos and memorabilia and put that shit on Youtube.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Saniflush on May 09, 2012, 06:55:18 AM
Sue that fucker for everything...take the Trailer, take the freezer in the back yard (with the dead carcass, of whatever, in it), take the 89 Camaro that runs (sometimes), take all of his Bahr Bryant and Nick Sabben pictures, take all of the Daniel Moore photos (even the Illegal Prothro Catch against USM that had to be forfeited, therefore that game never happened) and take all of the other memorabilia crap that's all over the house including his bama bath robe and slippers.

Then record you burning all of the photos and memorabilia and put that shit on Youtube.


It won't matter.  He will be kept in the fold with open arms.  Probably supplied box tickets to every event.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: The Six on May 09, 2012, 08:26:06 AM

It won't matter.  He will be kept in the fold with open arms.  Probably supplied box tickets to every event.

Tickets?

Sideline passes for life is more like it.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: djsimp on May 09, 2012, 08:43:32 AM
Tickets?

Sideline passes for life is more like it.

He'll probably lead the team out to the field at this years bama/Corndog game.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: GH2001 on May 09, 2012, 09:27:29 AM
Don't make me go all lawyer up in this bitch!

I know from a legal perspective its alleged until he is guilty, but in informal passing and in articles why keep saying he allegedly rubbed his nuts on another guy? He rubbed his sack in another dude's face.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 09, 2012, 09:31:55 AM
I know from a legal perspective its alleged until he is guilty, but in informal passing and in articles why keep saying he allegedly rubbed his nuts on another guy? He rubbed his sack in another dude's face.

Pfffft....all photoshopping, touching up or altering the film.  He never even whipped out his junk....allegedly.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: JR4AU on May 09, 2012, 09:33:09 AM
I know from a legal perspective its alleged until he is guilty, but in informal passing and in articles why keep saying he allegedly rubbed his nuts on another guy? He rubbed his sack in another dude's face.

Getting all lawyer now, but I think it read "allegedly committed sexual battery".  To compare it to Trayvon/Zimmerman.  It's not "alleged" that Zimmerman shot and killed him.  That's a fact.  It's alleged he Murdered him.  And the fact is, we don't know if he did or didn't murder him.  IOW, we don't know if his actions fit all the elements of the law to make it murder. 

Maybe VV wants to get more verbose than that. 
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Snaggletiger on May 09, 2012, 09:34:24 AM
Getting all lawyer now, but I think it read "allegedly committed sexual battery".  To compare it to Trayvon/Zimmerman.  It's not "alleged" that Zimmerman shot and killed him.  That's a fact.  It's alleged he Murdered him.  And the fact is, we don't know if he did or didn't murder him.  IOW, we don't know if his actions fit all the elements of the law to make it murder. 

Maybe VV wants to get more verbose than that.

He can't.  Right now his mouth is wrapped around some serious man-meat.
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: GH2001 on May 09, 2012, 09:35:40 AM
Getting all lawyer now, but I think it read "allegedly committed sexual battery".  To compare it to Trayvon/Zimmerman.  It's not "alleged" that Zimmerman shot and killed him.  That's a fact.  It's alleged he Murdered him.  And the fact is, we don't know if he did or didn't murder him.  IOW, we don't know if his actions fit all the elements of the law to make it murder. 

Maybe VV wants to get more verbose than that.

I would rather neither of you go any further. It's just a simple observation. Just pisses me off that everytime this clown's name is mentioned, what he did is "alleged". Pfffttttttt.......
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: JR4AU on May 09, 2012, 09:37:23 AM
I would rather neither of you go any further. It's just a simple observation. Just pisses me off that everytime this clown's name is mentioned, what he did is "alleged". Pfffttttttt.......

I tried not to, you asked.  But yeah, unless you're involved in the legal process, it makes no sense to called "alleged".  I guess folks are afraid of being sued. 
Title: Re: The Rematch Part II
Post by: Godfather on May 09, 2012, 10:14:19 AM
He can't.  Right now his mouth is wrapped around some serious man-meat.

Actually he is too worried about his own defense.  He teabagged the shit out of Frodo