Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 02:45:28 PM

Title: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 02:45:28 PM
Today's the big day for college football.

Here's the USA Today Poll:

http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2011/12/4/2610090/college-football-rankings-week-15-usa-today-coaches-poll-alabama-oklahoma-state/in/2373757

Quote

1   LSU


2   Alabama


3   Oklahoma State


4   Stanford


5   Oregon


6   Boise State


7   Arkansas


8   Wisconsin


9   South Carolina


10   Kansas State


11   Virginia Tech


12   Michigan


13   Michigan State


14   Clemson


15   TCU


16   Baylor


17   Houston


18   Georgia


19   Oklahoma


20   Nebraska


21   So. Miss


22   West Virginia


23   Penn State


24   Cincinnati


25   Florida State
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 02:55:34 PM
Not sure if this is correct, but:

Alabama - 1399 points
Oklahoma St - 1367

It's really close in terms of points even though Bama is one spot ahead of Oklahoma State.

Rumors are swirling that Bama is actually going to win the computer poll.  You know.  The poll that involves numerous computer rankings that are confidential in terms of how they rank teams. 

Someone on a different site is tallying how many Harris poll voters have released their rankings early.  So far, eight voters have put Oklahoma State at #2 and Alabama at #3.  Three voters have put Alabama at #2 and Oklahoma State at #3. 

Even if Bama wins the computer poll, it won't be by much.  Supposedly, Oklahoma State needs 44 Harris poll voters to vote them #2 for them to go over Alabama. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 02:57:55 PM
Quote
Mark_Schlabach Mark Schlabach
#Pokes made up 134 points to #Bama in coaches' poll. Tide lead down to 32 points from 166 a week ago. This is gonna be close, folks #BCS
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: The Prowler on December 04, 2011, 04:17:58 PM
What happens if the computers put Okie State at #2 or #1?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Jumbo on December 04, 2011, 04:23:35 PM
Quote
RT @DannySheridan1: just had another person very close to the situation, tell me it's definitely Ala vs LSU in NC game.  Rocky Balboa vs Apolo Creed 2
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:36:28 PM
You want bullshit?

The "Annar" poll in the computer rankings:

1. Alabama
2. Boise St
3. Houston

9. LSU
10. Oklahoma State

Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:37:46 PM
The Dezenzio poll of the computer rankings:

1. LSU
2. Alabama
3. Boise State
4. Stanford

14. Oklahoma State
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:38:35 PM
The Tempo-Free Gridiron poll of the computer rankings:

1. Alabama
2. LSU

9. Oklahoma State
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:39:01 PM
The Ken Stromness poll of the computer rankings:

1. LSU
2. Alabama


11. Oklahoma State
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Token on December 04, 2011, 04:39:43 PM
Are those the real computers that go into the poll?  If so, that is total bullshit.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:40:18 PM
The Regression Based poll in the computer rankings:

1. Alabama
2. LSU

4. Oklahoma State

Here's the link for these rankings:

http://masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 04:43:22 PM
The Solecismic poll:

1. LSU
2. Alabama

8. Oklahoma State

I'm not sure how much of an effect this individual polls have, but it's just further evidence that the BCS does nothing.  The human votes make the most difference and the human voters are inept, corrupt, homerish, or accurate.  No way to be sure the system is producing the best champion, which is something we all already know. 

Again - I've prefaced this since November 6th.  I think Alabama is the #2 team in the country.  If the BCS puts #1 vs. #2 in the championship, then it should be LSU vs. Alabama.  However, I see the arguments against it happening, and as a homer Auburn fan, I don't want Alabama in the championship.  There's enough of a reason out there to give Oklahoma State a chance.  But sadly, it looks like uncontrollable bullshit is going to keep them out of it.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Token on December 04, 2011, 04:54:06 PM
I'm at the point where I think Alabama is the #2 team in the BCS.  I think they would beat OSU almost as bad as LSU would beat OSU.  BUT, Alabama needed a lot of magic to happen to be in the position it is in because of shitty special teams play.  They had their opportunity, and couldn't capitalize.  So, if the voters have the opinion that OSU is the #2 team after yesterday, then so be it.  As long as we don't find that any of them are voting Bama/OSU further down that 2 or 3 to purposely skew the votes, then I have no problem with it. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 04, 2011, 05:37:24 PM
Rumors are swirling that Bama is actually going to win the computer poll.  You know.  The poll that involves numerous computer rankings that are confidential in terms of how they rank teams. 
Here is the link to the 6 computer polls the BCS uses:

http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4765872

Those polls give you the rankings. Some don't come out to the public until after the BCS release every Sunday is all. They will drop the highest and lowest rank for each team in the standings during the selection process.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 06:37:00 PM
Quote
JHokanson Justin Hokanson
Reports coming out now that Virginia Tech may be headed to the Sugar, meaning Virginia may be headed to Chick-Fil-A.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 06:41:14 PM
Most media guys are saying it's a done deal.

LSU vs. Alabama for the BCSCG. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: jmar on December 04, 2011, 06:42:57 PM
:facepalm:
We don't want to play the Cavaliers. Ain't they arrogant like Bamers?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 07:06:17 PM
Auburn vs. Virginia - Chick Fil A

Florida vs. Ohio State - Gator Bowl

Miss State to Music City.

Vandy to Liberty Bowl.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Godfather on December 04, 2011, 07:20:50 PM
Auburn vs. Virginia - Chick Fil A

Lets just rename this the Who Gives a Shit Bowl.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Godfather on December 04, 2011, 07:29:04 PM
Honestly, I don't see that happening.  Chik fil A gets first choice at the #2 ACC team.   I don't see why they would take Virginia over Virginia Tech or FSU.  Unless VT gets a BCS at large, which I don't see happening.

*edit* Missed the twat above about VT to Sugar Bowl.  I wish they would take FSU, I would love to play FSU again.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 07:45:39 PM
Clay Travis says he's already got word about the BCS games:

Quote
An hour before the official BCS announcements on ESPN, all of the BCS games are set.

On January 3rd the Sugar Bowl will feature Virginia Tech -- WTF -- against Michigan.

The Orange Bowl will have Clemson against West Virginia on January 4th. (As a bonus the official Orange Bowl site isn't even keeping this a secret. They're already selling merchadise).

The Rose Bowl on January 2nd will match-up Wisconsin and Oregon.

 The Fiesta Bowl, alson on January 2nd, will be Stanford against Oklahoma State.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: CCTAU on December 04, 2011, 08:20:27 PM
As expected, the turds are in.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: BZ770 on December 04, 2011, 08:21:59 PM
I may be wrong but the last time I remember playing Virginia was in 98 to open the season on a Thursday night.  I remember losing this game.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: ssgaufan on December 04, 2011, 08:23:32 PM
 :puke:  BCS
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 04, 2011, 08:27:28 PM
Somewhere, there is a McDonalds employee that is about to be decapitated by Kaos.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: jmar on December 04, 2011, 08:52:19 PM
Somewhere, there is a McDonalds employee that is about to be decapitated by Kaos.
Yeah Bama to NCG = hot-house toms on a "all beef patty." 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: CCTAU on December 04, 2011, 08:58:17 PM
And Clint Moseley brings AU in at #25!
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 09:41:35 PM
And Clint Moseley brings AU in at #25!

If that's not a clear cut sign that the system is fucked up, I don't know what is. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 09:44:53 PM
The difference between Alabama and Oklahoma State was .0086.  Wow.

Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 09:45:50 PM
Chizik voted Bama #2.  He's doing it wrong. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 04, 2011, 09:53:52 PM
Quote
George Petrie is the first Alabamian to earn a Ph.D. degree. He received his B.A. and M.A. degrees from the University of Virginia in 1887 and a Ph.D. in "history, political economy, and jurisprudence" from Johns Hopkins University in 1890. At Auburn, known until 1892 as the Agricultural and Mechanical College of Alabama, and from 1892 to 1960 as Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Petrie is considered the founder of both the History Department and the Graduate School, as well as the school's athletic program.

His time at the University of Virginia inspired Petrie to choose burnt orange and navy blue as the official colors for Auburn's athletic teams. Upon organizing the first Auburn football team in 1892, Petrie arranged for the team to play the University of Georgia team at Piedmont Park in Atlanta, Georgia. Auburn won the game, 10–0, in front of 2,000 spectators. The game inaugurated what is known to college football fans as the Deep South's Oldest Rivalry.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: The Prowler on December 04, 2011, 11:26:11 PM
We can go ahead and rename the BCS Championship Bowl Game to the NCAA Probation Bowl Game.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: JR4AU on December 04, 2011, 11:36:34 PM
Can't believe none of our hog friends aren't crying about USCe going ahead of them in the bowl hierarchy.  Only losses to the 2 teams playing in the BCSCG. 

Also, thought someone had said that if the same conference had 2 in the title game, then that conference could have 3 in the BCS.  Not true?  Not stumping for Ark, but they got fux'd IMHO.

Sugar Bowl is a beg fat Pffffft.

Oh, and fuck bammer!
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 05, 2011, 07:23:42 AM
Only way SEC could have had three is if Georgia won the conference championship. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 05, 2011, 07:39:39 AM
How the coaches voted:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/story/2011-final-coaches-ballots/51647436/1
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 05, 2011, 08:37:37 AM
How the coaches voted:

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/story/2011-final-coaches-ballots/51647436/1

So, quite possibly, the reason bammer is in is that Saban and Cutcliffe both voted Okie State down to #4...

.0086
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Kaos on December 05, 2011, 08:40:25 AM
Saban's punk ass voted OK State 4tb.  What a fucking douchebag.  Chickenshit move.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Buzz Killington on December 05, 2011, 08:41:06 AM
Saban's punk ass voted OK State 4tb.  What a fucking douchebag.  Chickenshit move.

So did David Cutcliffe...WTF?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: djsimp on December 05, 2011, 08:43:26 AM
So did David Cutcliffe...WTF?

I'm calling it now, Cutcliffe will be Sabans next OC. McClwtfever heads to Kansas and Duke gives up on football.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: GH2001 on December 05, 2011, 09:21:50 AM
So did David Cutcliffe...WTF?

Quote
Cutcliffe attended Banks High School in Birmingham where he played football. He attended the University of Alabama where he worked as a student assistant on Bear Bryant's Alabama staff.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUChizad on December 05, 2011, 09:57:47 AM
Once again, Chizik demonstrated class, and Saban did just the opposite. Water is wet.

You guys realize that Auburn, as much as we, our own fans, have shit all over this dismal season, is the second best win on Alabama's schedule behind Arkansas? Penn State lost to every ranked team they played. Georgia State is D-II. No other team on their schedule had a winning record.

But everyone just KNOWS they are the better team. I mean, Saban, right? The Bear was still coaching there just 30 short years ago. The Big XII is down this year. The SEC is impermeable. What evidence do we have to support that? Well, we just know. Oklahoma, Houston, Baylor, Kansas State, Tex A&M, Oklahoma, Texas. All shit. We know because Oklahoma State beat them all, so they can't be any good.

Anyone find it hilariously ironic that the "S" in BCS stands for series? And the official twitter account for the BCS is, I shit you not, @EveryGameCounts (https://twitter.com/#!/EveryGameCounts). Should stand for Ballgames Count Sometimes.

I'm fucking done with the BCS. I'm pretty sure the nation (outside of the crimsonnecks in Alabama) are with me.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Townhallsavoy on December 05, 2011, 09:59:27 AM
You'll still watch it.  And you'll still be excited when Auburn has a chance to get into the BCS. 

They have us by the balls.  Nothing we're willing to do about it.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUTiger1 on December 05, 2011, 10:03:44 AM
Troy Calhoun is a complete dumbass, Okie St at #5.  Fucking 5th?  Really?  Doug Marrone and Gary Pinkel are dumbass too.  David Shaw is a homer that voted his team 3rd and I would expect as much.   
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUChizad on December 05, 2011, 10:06:42 AM
Actually, I probably won't. I'll be arriving to a clusterfucked New Orleans airport on January 9th returning from my honeymoon. Definitely won't have to put up with the bullshit build-up that we heard for

THE GREATEST GAME EVER TO BE PLAYED

Which will no doubt be 1000 times more nauseating than it was the first time around. Like a six week old McRib. It was bad enough when it went down the first time, but when it comes back up it will be even more disgusting.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUChizad on December 05, 2011, 10:19:00 AM
Arkansas lost to LSU AND Alabama. Aren't they more deserving by nonexistant poll voters' logic?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUChizad on December 05, 2011, 07:44:31 PM
Boise had one loss and their best win was beating the SEC East champions and goes to the Maaco bowl.

Bama had one loss and their best win was beating the #3 SEC West team and goes to the National Championship.

Figure that out.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 05, 2011, 09:26:20 PM
Boise had one loss and their best win was beating the SEC East champions and goes to the Maaco bowl.

Bama had one loss and their best win was beating the #3 SEC West team and goes to the National Championship.

Figure that out.
The biggest problem with your reasoning is you want pump up other teams wins, while forgiving who they lost to, while holding Alabama's loss against them and multiplying it. That has been the biggest flaw in your logic (and others) since we started talking about it.

Boise lost to a then unranked TCU. TCU also lost to Baylor and Southern Methodist. Southern. Methodist. That shit is going to leave a mark, and it's not that impressive. To further compound the issue, TCU is now only ranked 18th.

Now, let's talk about the SEC East champions UGA. Their biggest wins this season were over then ranked #20 AU and #23 Ga Tech. I can almost guarantee you that Michigan St is going to fuck them up too in the bowl game.

Alabama lost to the #1 team in the country, who has not lost to anybody. And to further that, LSU has a perfect BCS rating. Oh, and that worthless third team in the SEC Arkansas that Alabama beat? They've only been beaten by #1 and #2, and have a better SOS than Stanford, Oregon, Boise, and Wisconsin. Isn't SOS what you guys have been harping on? While those losses still count against them, it softens the blow. Same logic that still has AU at #25.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: AUChizad on December 05, 2011, 10:35:54 PM
Boise lost to a then unranked TCU. TCU also lost to Baylor and Southern Methodist. Southern. Methodist. That shit is going to leave a mark, and it's not that impressive. To further compound the issue, TCU is now only ranked 18th.
There's that circular logic again. "We know TCU's not any good because they're only ranked 18th!"

You don't really believe that a team should be measured more by comparing their single losses than comparing their multiple quality wins. It suits your belief that Alabama deserves to live out its birthright.

The two Alabama schools went undefeated, but before that?

Florida lost to Ole Miss. Ole. Miss.

The year before LSU lost to a five loss unranked Arkansas, and a five loss Kentucky. Ken.Tuc.Key.

Need I continue?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 06, 2011, 01:22:30 PM
There's that circular logic again. "We know TCU's not any good because they're only ranked 18th!"

You don't really believe that a team should be measured more by comparing their single losses than comparing their multiple quality wins. It suits your belief that Alabama deserves to live out its birthright.
Well then how do we know ISU isn't better than LSU? How do we know that UAB isn't better than OSU? How do you know that Penn State isn't good enough to play for the championship? You had no problem knocking Arkansas to show that Alabama only had one decent win that wasn't really quality, but you're going to be an advocate for #18 TCU? You don't even make sense from one post to the next, because you're trying so desperately to beat a round peg into a square hole.

When you have multiple "quality wins" but then shit the bed and blow a 17 point lead against ISU, then what does it all mean? How much does the SOS matter when you blow it against a really shitty team? Does it mean you only consider the wins and ignore the loss to ISU? I mean fuck, if that's the logic you are going to apply to all teams, then Alabama losing to LSU is most certainly excuseable, right?

The problem is you are picking and choosing what standards you want to apply to which teams, those standards that you don't want to apply, and then those standards that don't exist that you want to insert into the system so you can put a round peg in a square hole. I haven't said shit about anything being Alabama's "birthright". Like I said before, if the system said OSU was going to play for it all, then so be it. If this same exact scenario played out and put AU into the NCG, then you would be just fine with it. Nothing to see here. The system is working! Whatever benefits YOUR team is A-OK. 

Bottom line is you're simply butthurt that it benefited your rival and puts them in a position to win the NC this year. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: War Eagle!!! on December 06, 2011, 01:30:25 PM
Well then how do we know ISU isn't better than LSU? How do we know that UAB isn't better than OSU? How do you know that Penn State isn't good enough to play for the championship? You had no problem knocking Arkansas to show that Alabama only had one decent win that wasn't really quality, but you're going to be an advocate for #18 TCU? You don't even make sense from one post to the next, because you're trying so desperately to beat a round peg into a square hole.

When you have multiple "quality wins" but then shit the bed and blow a 17 point lead against ISU, then what does it all mean? How much does the SOS matter when you blow it against a really shitty team? Does it mean you only consider the wins and ignore the loss to ISU? I mean fuck, if that's the logic you are going to apply to all teams, then Alabama losing to LSU is most certainly excuseable, right?

The problem is you are picking and choosing what standards you want to apply to which teams, those standards that you don't want to apply, and then those standards that don't exist that you want to insert into the system so you can put a round peg in a square hole. I haven't said shit about anything being Alabama's "birthright". Like I said before, if the system said OSU was going to play for it all, then so be it. If this same exact scenario played out and put AU into the NCG, then you would be just fine with it. Nothing to see here. The system is working! Whatever benefits YOUR team is A-OK. 

Bottom line is you're simply butthurt that it benefited your rival and puts them in a position to win the NC this year.

You're a dumb ass...

And make stupid fucking arguments...
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: CCTAU on December 06, 2011, 01:53:01 PM
Well then how do we know ISU isn't better than LSU? How do we know that UAB isn't better than OSU?

Because they haven't played, dumbass.

Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 06, 2011, 02:12:29 PM
You're a dumb ass...

And make stupid fucking arguments...
Chizad is the one that opened the door for it.

It's not that difficult to understand when you use all of the factors.

#8 Boise State A) had one loss, and B) does not have a particularly strong SOS. That loss to an unranked TCU team who C) has a not so great SOS, and D) has losses than include one particularly shitty team, is going to leave a mark.

The Maaco Bowl gets the first pick of Mountain West teams not eligible for a BCS bowl. Due to Boise St being in the MWC and how the qualification process works for some conferences, including the WAC, Boise isn't eligible for an automatic BCS bid this season (obviously they could have gone to the NCG if they were ranked #1 or #2). Boise went to the Maaco Bowl last year as well, had the same record as this season, and were actually ranked higher last year.

Bama only lost to the #1 team in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country is better than losing to an unranked team. Which is the same logic some people cannot seem to comprehend when talking about Bama and OSU.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 06, 2011, 02:16:29 PM
Because they haven't played, dumbass.
Exactly.

So, by that reasoning, why can't ISU play LSU for the NC? If we don't know because they haven't played, how is it fair that ISU doesn't get a chance? Remember, we're picking and choosing what rules to apply, and we're doing it with the goal of excluding Alabama from the championship game.

That reasoning just doesn't work with what we use right now. Not that the system we have now is perfect by any means, but it provides some level of order. 
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: War Eagle!!! on December 06, 2011, 02:38:49 PM
Exactly.

So, by that reasoning, why can't ISU play LSU for the NC?

Because they lost fucking 5 or 6 other games dip shit...It can't be that hard to understand...

I can't fucking believe I am arguing with you...
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Godfather on December 06, 2011, 02:44:07 PM
Bama only lost to the #1 team in the country. Losing to the #1 team in the country is better than losing to an unranked team. Which is the same logic some people cannot seem to comprehend when talking about Bama and OSU.
Actually you fail again...and fail at what Chizad is pointing out to you.

You keep bringing up the one loss...OSU and bammer both have one loss.  What he is trying to point out was that their totally body of work was better than bammers so given the fact that each team has one loss what should count more? Who they lost to? or their overall body of work?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: War Eagle!!! on December 06, 2011, 02:49:27 PM
Actually you fail again...and fail at what Chizad is pointing out to you.

You keep bringing up the one loss...OSU and bammer both have one loss.  What he is trying to point out was that their totally body of work was better than bammers so given the fact that each team has one loss what should count more? Who they lost to? or their overall body of work?

Not only that, but damn...we know, that LSU can beat Alabama. We have no clue about OSU. The only alike teams are Texas A&M and Arkansas. By RWS' argument, Arkansas barely beat A&M, Alabama beat Arkansas and OSU beat A&M...therefor; Alabama is automatically better than OSU...
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: CCTAU on December 06, 2011, 02:52:53 PM
Well then how do we know ISU isn't better than LSU? How do we know that UAB isn't better than OSU?


Because they haven't played, dumbass.


OMG. Let me add,

BUT BAMMER AND LSU HAVE ALREADY PLAYED! BAMMER LOST!


THAT is why we can say they do not deserve to play again.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 06, 2011, 04:59:58 PM
Actually you fail again...and fail at what Chizad is pointing out to you.

You keep bringing up the one loss...OSU and bammer both have one loss.  What he is trying to point out was that their totally body of work was better than bammers so given the fact that each team has one loss what should count more? Who they lost to? or their overall body of work?
I see the point. The counterpoint is, why shouldn't you be penalized for losing to a shitty team?
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Kaos on December 06, 2011, 05:11:34 PM
I see the point. The counterpoint is, why shouldn't you be penalized for losing to a shitty team?

(http://blog.joerogan.net/wp-content/uploads/therev-370x512.jpg)
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: djsimp on December 06, 2011, 05:13:48 PM
(http://blog.joerogan.net/wp-content/uploads/therev-370x512.jpg)

Wow.......just wow. No words can explain how sick that is.......but funny at the same time.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: RWS on December 06, 2011, 05:31:33 PM
For that matter, OSU was at one point #2; ahead of Bama. They were getting credit for winning with a better SOS. But when you go and lose to a shit team, it's going to cost you. Rightfully so.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Kaos on December 06, 2011, 05:56:01 PM
For that matter, OSU was at one point #2; ahead of Bama. They were getting credit for winning with a better SOS. But when you go and lose to a shit team, it's going to cost you. Rightfully so.

(http://dodsonandross.com/files/blog_images/article-0-0D4D425B00000578-406_468x428_0.jpg?1312552760)
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: Godfather on December 06, 2011, 09:32:22 PM
(http://dodsonandross.com/files/blog_images/article-0-0D4D425B00000578-406_468x428_0.jpg?1312552760)
Thats not nice, you shouldn't post family pictures of the day RWS was conceived.
Title: Re: Official BCS/Bowl Selection Thread
Post by: The Prowler on December 06, 2011, 11:53:10 PM
Note to any newcomers...don't discuss college football matters with our resident bama retard (rws, the goat fucker).