Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

The Library => The SGA => Topic started by: AUTiger1 on May 16, 2011, 01:09:49 PM

Title: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 16, 2011, 01:09:49 PM
Well, no Trump and no Huck, so who are going to see as the contenders and pretenders?
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: djsimp on May 16, 2011, 03:37:15 PM
Well, no Trump and no Huck, so who are going to see as the contenders and pretenders?

I have no answer in full yet but I will tell you this; I am a very happy man that Trump is not running.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: GH2001 on May 17, 2011, 09:44:43 AM
Thank GAWD...on both accts.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 25, 2011, 03:50:28 PM
Well, no Trump and no Huck, so who are going to see as the contenders and pretenders?

Good riddance.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 25, 2011, 03:53:45 PM
Good riddance.

Agree.  I was glad to see them get out.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 25, 2011, 04:18:43 PM
Agree.  I was glad to see them get out.


I'm backing Herman Cain now.  I'd like to see him take on The Pharaoh in a teleprompter-less debate!
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 25, 2011, 04:19:55 PM

I'm backing Herman Cain now.  I'd like to see him take on The Pharaoh in a teleprompter-less debate!

Yeah, I have pretty much decided that I am on the "Cain Train".......no AWK, VV and Snaggle, not that kind of train.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 25, 2011, 04:22:33 PM
Yeah, I have pretty much decided that I am on the "Cain Train".......no AWK, VV and Snaggle, not that kind of train.

Me too but...I will not embrace libertarianism.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 25, 2011, 04:25:26 PM
Me too but...I will not embrace libertarianism.

It sure is pretty to look at though, and I do tend to have a lot of libertarian tendencies.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 25, 2011, 04:36:52 PM
It sure is pretty to look at though, and I do tend to have a lot of libertarian tendencies.


Odysseus, turn away from that siren call...
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 25, 2011, 04:44:45 PM

Odysseus, turn away from that siren call...

Don't worry, I will plug my ears with beeswax and not untie you from the mast no matter how much you beg.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 25, 2011, 04:52:50 PM
Don't worry, I will plug my ears with beeswax and not untie you from the mast no matter how much you beg.


I knew you were a man of education, AUT1.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 25, 2011, 05:01:41 PM

I knew you were a man of education, AUT1.

My mother was a librarian, b/c of her forcing me to read when I was young, even when she knew I hated it, I read a lot of great stuff.  I have since went back and re-read a lot of it.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: GH2001 on May 26, 2011, 09:36:37 AM
Me too but...I will not embrace libertarianism.
Actually TH, the Constitution was written in its true form around Libertarianism. But I do agree that some of those guys go way too far for my blood. Paul's foreign policy and Johnson's opposition to any kind of tarriff blew my mind.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: AUTiger1 on May 26, 2011, 10:34:23 AM
Actually TH, the Constitution was written in its true form around Libertarianism. But I do agree that some of those guys go way too far for my blood. Paul's foreign policy and Johnson's opposition to any kind of tarriff blew my mind.

While unfeasible as it is,  It's not that bad......if it were a perfect world.
Title: Re: No Trump and No Huck
Post by: Tarheel on May 26, 2011, 01:38:16 PM
Actually TH, the Constitution was written in its true form around Libertarianism. But I do agree that some of those guys go way too far for my blood. Paul's foreign policy and Johnson's opposition to any kind of tarriff blew my mind.

Well, perhaps, but I have to disagree with you just a little on usage, e.g. libertarianism with a small "L"; and written more for a true republic, with a small "R". 

I think fundamentally it may be fair enough to say that the modern libertarian movement is trying to align itself with the ideals of the Founders but it does go off-the-rails of responsibility in several matters such as foreign policy.  I've also got some issues with the way in which they would 'legalize' and 'decriminalize' drugs.  They are quick to point out the results of what they purport as the same policy in Portugal without realizing exactly what Portugal did to achieve those results (which many of them would probably disagree with entirely as a 'libertarian' policy).  Anyway, I don't want to start that debate over again...pages and pages have been written already.