Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Kaos on March 29, 2011, 01:14:17 PM

Title: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Kaos on March 29, 2011, 01:14:17 PM
Just ask South Carolina.  Back to back NIT titles.  And they went straight to the Final Four in... uh....when?

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011/03/anthony_grant_building_another.html

Scarbinsky forced to lick Bama sack.  It's sickening. 

Also, by this logic can we please get a ring for Mike Shula?  Wasn't possible without his players.  Damn straight. 
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: JR4AU on March 29, 2011, 01:18:20 PM
You just don't get it.
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Snaggletiger on March 29, 2011, 01:24:28 PM
Alabama's in the NIT?
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Townhallsavoy on March 29, 2011, 01:37:29 PM
NIT = Not in Tournament
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: AWK on March 29, 2011, 02:01:56 PM
NIT = Liberty Bowl.
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Snaggletiger on March 29, 2011, 02:12:40 PM
NIT = Liberty Bowl.

Well, it's no Poulan Weedeater Bowl
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Saniflush on March 29, 2011, 02:28:12 PM
Alabama's in the NIT?

How is Shreveport this time of year?
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Snaggletiger on March 29, 2011, 02:30:05 PM
How is Shreveport this time of year?

Anthony Grant > Roy Williams+Coach K+Rick Pitino
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Jumbo on March 29, 2011, 03:31:46 PM
Anthony Grant > Roy Williams+Coach K+Rick Pitino
+Christ on a Crutch.
Title: Re: NIT success is a harbinger of NCAA domination
Post by: Homer Samford on March 29, 2011, 10:13:22 PM
I guess the negates something at Auburn somehow.  :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: :taunt: