Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Pat Dye Field => War Damn Eagle => Topic started by: Tiger Wench on January 31, 2011, 05:03:47 PM

Title: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Tiger Wench on January 31, 2011, 05:03:47 PM
And I quote:

"Saban to the Titans? What y'all think?"

Discuss...
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: ssgaufan on January 31, 2011, 05:24:07 PM
I think I would stop pulling for the Titans.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AU_Tiger_2000 on January 31, 2011, 05:24:44 PM
Think he would draft Newton?  His first order of business with the Dolphins was to grab Ronnie Brown.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUJarhead on January 31, 2011, 05:26:50 PM
How long would he have lasted there had he signed Drew Brees and not Culpepper?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 31, 2011, 05:30:39 PM
Quentin Groves also tweeted "Saban to the Titans...if so we are gonna run Alabama for the next 10 years."
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUTailgatingRules on January 31, 2011, 05:33:57 PM
Probably tired of all the shit he got from the unwashed masses over the Iron Bowl loss.  I'd be getting the hell out of dodge too.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: The Prowler on January 31, 2011, 06:55:12 PM
And the fact that Coach Cheeeze is waxin' that Ass in recruitin in-state.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 07:00:10 PM
And the fact that Coach Cheeeze is waxin' that Ass in recruitin in-state.

OMG!!!!
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: The Prowler on January 31, 2011, 07:11:35 PM
OMG!!!!
Seriously, wanna take a quick look at the Top 10 recruits, in-state?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 07:24:12 PM
Seriously, wanna take a quick look at the Top 10 recruits, in-state?

Until the NCAA says Universities can only recruit inside it's own state, winning in-state recruiting battles means little to nothing.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on January 31, 2011, 07:26:21 PM
Out of all the coaches mentioned from the so called NFL gurus, Saban was only mentioned once. Although, Gruden seems to be a name mentioned a good bit.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 31, 2011, 07:59:32 PM
Until the NCAA says Universities can only recruit inside it's own state, winning in-state recruiting battles means little to nothing.

Soooo...you're in step 2 of the Sabanation process?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 08:11:18 PM
Soooo...you're in step 2 of the Sabanation process?

I've seen his cattle.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on January 31, 2011, 08:12:58 PM
I've seen his scrotum.

Fixt
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: The Prowler on January 31, 2011, 08:55:30 PM
When the instate recruits are among the top 20-25 at their position, then I'd say it matters. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on January 31, 2011, 09:15:22 PM
Until the NCAA says Universities can only recruit inside it's own state, winning in-state recruiting battles means little to nothing.
WEAK!
I thought you were better than that.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 09:29:26 PM
WEAK!
I thought you were better than that.

I'm trying not to get into this recruiting pissing match, but fuck it.

Rivals
Alabama -- 1
Auburn -- 6

Scout
Auburn -- 3
Alabama -- 8

ESPN
Alabama -- 3
Auburn -- 8

Alabama leads in 2 of the 3 major recruiting sites.  Until Alabama is 10-15 spots behind Auburn on the recruiting sites, I will disregard any idiot who tries to use the phrase "waxin' that ass" In-state or not.  It's equivalent to a politician boasting about winning a single district while he's losing the overall voter count. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on January 31, 2011, 10:13:58 PM
I'm trying not to get into this recruiting pissing match, but fuck it.

Rivals
Alabama -- 1
Auburn -- 6

Scout
Auburn -- 3
Alabama -- 8

ESPN
Alabama -- 3
Auburn -- 8

Alabama leads in 2 of the 3 major recruiting sites.  Until Alabama is 10-15 spots behind Auburn on the recruiting sites, I will disregard any idiot who tries to use the phrase "waxin' that ass" In-state or not.  It's equivalent to a politician boasting about winning a single district while he's losing the overall voter count.

OUTSTANDING!  And that has shit to do directly with the subject of IN STATE recruiting which was the subject. 

But let's stick with yours. 

Now I don't keep up with it REAL close, but I heard today that even after graduation, and NFL early defections, that Alabama has to clear 14 spots to sign a 25 player class.  So, of that #1 class, you have to subtract the talent, most likely talent that didn't pan out.   Remember Star Jackson was a 4 or 5 star QB as part of Saban's first NC crootin' class...is he still on campus?  Who was the other 5 star kid that just recently t'fered to South Alabama? 

Crootin' matters!  No doubt, but bammers claimed they'd own the state when Saban arrived, and he's getting his ass kicked in state, and Auburn is keeping pace with them overall in recruiting.  A #1 class is a #8 class when one five star fails to pan out.  If you're in the top 5, you're in REAL good shape.  If you are in the top 10 and have little to no attrition, and good luck with the talent, you might realistically have a top 3 class when all is said and done.  All this is well known...

The subject was in state crootin'.  And bammers are singing a different tune these days about that. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: The Prowler on January 31, 2011, 10:35:40 PM
OUTSTANDING!  And that has shit to do directly with the subject of IN STATE recruiting which was the subject. 

But let's stick with yours. 

Now I don't keep up with it REAL close, but I heard today that even after graduation, and NFL early defections, that Alabama has to clear 14 spots to sign a 25 player class.  So, of that #1 class, you have to subtract the talent, most likely talent that didn't pan out.   Remember Star Jackson was a 4 or 5 star QB as part of Saban's first NC crootin' class...is he still on campus?  Who was the other 5 star kid that just recently t'fered to South Alabama? 

Crootin' matters!  No doubt, but bammers claimed they'd own the state when Saban arrived, and he's getting his ass kicked in state, and Auburn is keeping pace with them overall in recruiting.  A #1 class is a #8 class when one five star fails to pan out.  If you're in the top 5, you're in REAL good shape.  If you are in the top 10 and have little to no attrition, and good luck with the talent, you might realistically have a top 3 class when all is said and done.  All this is well known...

The subject was in state crootin'.  And bammers are singing a different tune these days about that. 
^^THIS^^
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 10:37:11 PM
OUTSTANDING!  And that has shit to do directly with the subject of IN STATE recruiting which was the subject. 

But let's stick with yours. 

Now I don't keep up with it REAL close, but I heard today that even after graduation, and NFL early defections, that Alabama has to clear 14 spots to sign a 25 player class.  So, of that #1 class, you have to subtract the talent, most likely talent that didn't pan out.   Remember Star Jackson was a 4 or 5 star QB as part of Saban's first NC crootin' class...is he still on campus?  Who was the other 5 star kid that just recently t'fered to South Alabama? 

Crootin' matters!  No doubt, but bammers claimed they'd own the state when Saban arrived, and he's getting his ass kicked in state, and Auburn is keeping pace with them overall in recruiting.  A #1 class is a #8 class when one five star fails to pan out.  If you're in the top 5, you're in REAL good shape.  If you are in the top 10 and have little to no attrition, and good luck with the talent, you might realistically have a top 3 class when all is said and done.  All this is well known...

The subject was in state crootin'.  And bammers are singing a different tune these days about that.

Obviously, my OMG post was lost on you and prowler.  I'll clarify what I thought I did a good job of pointing out already. 

I'm not arguing that Auburn is or isn't winning the in-state battle, I'm saying that as long as Alabama is ranked in the top 10 nationally and is filling it's needs, it isn't getting waxed by any team on the recruiting front.  If you and prowler (or anyone else) wants to crow about Saban getting his ass waxed in-state, while his out of state recruits are trumping your instate recruits, go ahead.

Auburn does own the state this year, but it has nothing to do with recruiting.  That battle was won on Black Friday.



Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 10:40:41 PM
^^THIS^^

The local idiot gives you the stamp of approval. 

I rest my case.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Buzz Killington on January 31, 2011, 11:01:43 PM
Geez, this thread is worse than that time I went to the museum as a kid.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on January 31, 2011, 11:04:39 PM
Geez, this thread is worse than that time I went to the museum as a kid.

Don't touch anything, or it might break.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: The Prowler on January 31, 2011, 11:05:30 PM
The local idiot gives you the stamp of approval. 

I rest my case.
"The local idiot" just made you his bitch.

After Wednesday I'll do the comparisons...I'll break it down by position.  Then we'll get to truely see how SPuat's out of State recruiting did against Auburn's.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 11:12:33 PM
"The local idiot" just made you his bitch.

After Wednesday I'll do the comparisons...I'll break it down by position.  Then we'll get to truely see how SPuat's out of State recruiting did against Auburn's.

Save the typing.  I'm not going to read it.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on January 31, 2011, 11:27:26 PM


Auburn does own the state this year, but it has nothing to do with recruiting.  That battle was won on Black Friday.

You're kidding...right?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: BZ770 on January 31, 2011, 11:33:49 PM
Wonder if TitanTiger will change his name? :haha:
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on January 31, 2011, 11:45:11 PM
You're kidding...right?

Yes
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Townhallsavoy on February 01, 2011, 09:01:26 AM
You all fell right into Token's trap. 

Instead of discussing Saban to the Titans, we're discussing the relevancy of in state recruiting.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AU_Tiger_2000 on February 01, 2011, 10:59:34 AM
You all fell right into Token's trap. 

Instead of discussing Saban to the Titans, we're discussing the relevancy of in state recruiting.

Dance monkeys!  Dance I say!  Bwahahaha!!!!
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 01, 2011, 11:55:04 AM
Until the NCAA says Universities can only recruit inside it's own state, winning in-state recruiting battles means little to nothing.

Hey, dammit.  Stop stealing our material.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on February 01, 2011, 12:01:07 PM
Hey, dammit.  Stop stealing our material.

Winner.

That was an actual quote made on AUN by someone in this thread.  To be fair though, it was made almost 3 years ago.  I thought it might go unnoticed.  I had wonderful plans for that quote, until JR fucked it up.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: War Eagle!!! on February 01, 2011, 12:06:28 PM
Winner.

That was an actual quote made on AUN by someone in this thread.  To be fair though, it was made almost 3 years ago.  I thought it might go unnoticed.  I had wonderful plans for that quote, until JR fucked it up.

Spill it...
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUTiger1 on February 01, 2011, 12:07:32 PM
Spill it...

What do we win if we guess correctly?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on February 01, 2011, 12:09:45 PM
Spill it...

There's no fun in it now.

What do we win if we guess correctly?

A 3 round blast in the back of the head.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: War Eagle!!! on February 01, 2011, 12:11:40 PM
What do we win if we guess correctly?

I am guessing Chad. That's who it sounds like. The sentence is put together way too well for it to be Prowler...
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: GH2001 on February 01, 2011, 12:21:35 PM
I am guessing Chad. That's who it sounds like. The sentence is put together way too well for it to be Prowler...
:bugs:
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUTiger1 on February 01, 2011, 12:51:47 PM
A 3 round blast in the back of the head.

Yeah, I need to login and play sometime. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUChizad on February 01, 2011, 12:56:38 PM
I am guessing Chad. That's who it sounds like. The sentence is put together way too well for it to be Prowler...
I don't remember writing it, but it's highly possible.

I still feel that way.

HOWEVER, after all the braying about how Saban was going to lock up our own state, and it would be impossible for any Auburn coach to ever compete with him for the in-state battle when you factor in tradishun, etc., AND add to that the fact that when Chizik was hired many, especially the media, had decided that Auburn lose 100% of their head-to-head battles with Alabama...it's funny to point out that Chizik is indeed "waxing that ass" in the in-state recruiting battle.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Godfather on February 01, 2011, 01:46:44 PM
They didn't want them anyways
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on February 01, 2011, 01:52:46 PM
They didn't want them anyways

....and their rolling five deep. Wait, wrong team.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 01, 2011, 08:05:26 PM
Winner.

That was an actual quote made on AUN by someone in this thread.  To be fair though, it was made almost 3 years ago.  I thought it might go unnoticed.  I had wonderful plans for that quote, until JR fucked it up.

I'm sorry I fucked up your little fun time.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Token on February 01, 2011, 08:36:29 PM
I'm sorry I fucked up your little fun time.

Say it like you mean it.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AWK on February 01, 2011, 11:00:08 PM
Say it like you mean it.
What the fuck is an AUN? Explain yourself.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 02, 2011, 12:25:00 AM
Say it like you mean it.

Ive had my fill of cops already this week, dont push it bub.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 02, 2011, 12:52:34 PM
Funny shit, Nick tweetimg away about recruiting, and classless bammers with huge e-nuts talking smack to him :haha:
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Snaggletiger on February 02, 2011, 01:01:23 PM
Somehow the words Nick Fairley and Tweet don't go together.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Tiger Wench on February 02, 2011, 01:05:00 PM
Somehow the words Nick Fairley and Tweet don't go together.

he is a Tweet MONSTER.  Trying to follow him requires a serious time committment.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Snaggletiger on February 02, 2011, 01:06:59 PM
Lee Ziemba 6'8" 320 lbs.

Nick Fairley 6'5" 318 lbs.

Both currently tweeting.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 02, 2011, 01:10:22 PM
Lee Ziemba 6'8" 320 lbs.

Nick Fairley 6'5" 318 lbs.

Both currently tweeting.

Pugh too...all talking a shitload of smack about bammer and saban.  Worth the time to sign up with the tweets today
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Saniflush on February 02, 2011, 01:16:33 PM
Lee Ziemba 6'8" 320 lbs.

Nick Fairley 6'5" 318 lbs.

Both currently tweeting.

People laugh cause I game all the time as well. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Tiger Wench on February 02, 2011, 01:27:38 PM
Funny shit, Nick tweetimg away about recruiting, and classless bammers with huge e-nuts talking smack to him :haha:

I can read what Fairley writes, but how do I read what other people are tweeting to him?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: War Eagle!!! on February 02, 2011, 01:58:50 PM
Funny shit, Nick tweetimg away about recruiting, and classless bammers with huge e-nuts talking smack to him :haha:

Link please...
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 02, 2011, 02:20:55 PM
Link please...

www.twitter.com/nick_fairley251
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: chinook on February 02, 2011, 02:44:46 PM
Tweeting is for the birds.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: JR4AU on February 02, 2011, 03:55:18 PM
Tweeting is for the birds.

Pussy is just for cats?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 02, 2011, 04:03:39 PM
Pussy is just for cats?

Yes.  Yes it is.  Please to be serving me. 

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/Chizad-Lappy/catman.jpg)
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AWK on February 02, 2011, 05:14:48 PM
Yes.  Yes it is.  Please to be serving me. 

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/Chizad-Lappy/catman.jpg)
A man that wears makeup and a wig would not appear to be that much into pussy, no?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 02, 2011, 05:22:31 PM
A man that wears makeup and a wig would not appear to be that much into pussy, no?


Gene Simmons just laughed at you. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Tiger Wench on February 02, 2011, 05:34:07 PM

Gene Simmons just laughed at you.

Yeah, but Gene and the other boys are the original item.  The makeup does not make the man.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AU_Tiger_2000 on February 02, 2011, 05:39:02 PM

Gene Simmons just laughed at you.

Well he did say appear to.  Gene and company might be the exception that proves the rule.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AWK on February 02, 2011, 06:20:55 PM
Well he did say appear to.  Gene and company might be the exception that proves the rule.
Fact.

See Insane Clown Posse.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AUChizad on February 02, 2011, 06:40:43 PM
Fact.

See Insane Clown Posse.
Fuckin MAGNETS!!! How do they work?
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on February 02, 2011, 11:33:07 PM
Fact.

See Insane Clown Posse.

Eminem just laughed with you.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 02, 2011, 11:44:43 PM
Fact.

See Insane Clown Posse.

Fallacy.

See Motley Crue.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on February 02, 2011, 11:48:20 PM
Fallacy.

See Motley Crue.

KISS looked cool doing, Motley Crue looked liked a bunch of bitches with teh face paintage. I do likes their music though. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 03, 2011, 12:40:55 AM
KISS looked cool doing, Motley Crue looked liked a bunch of bitches with teh face paintage. I do likes their music though.

Nikki Sixx still slept through more poo-nanny than you'll bag in two lifetimes. 
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: djsimp on February 03, 2011, 09:01:49 AM
Nikki Sixx still slept through more poo-nanny than you'll bag in two lifetimes.

Lets not forget the crotch critters that he has obtained along the way.
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: AU_Tiger_2000 on February 03, 2011, 10:39:16 AM
Fallacy.

See Motley Crue.

Fact.

See Little Richard, Boy George, David Bowie (though he was an equal opportunity swinger), Freddy Mercury, and I think Bret Michaels is trying too hard to overcompensate.  And his drummer was named Rikki Rockett.

And even if KISS was straight, their genre of music was still called "glam", which carries a certain stigma with it :fag:
Title: Re: Nick Fairley just tweeted...
Post by: Kaos on February 03, 2011, 10:18:27 PM
Fact.

See Little Richard, Boy George, David Bowie (though he was an equal opportunity swinger), Freddy Mercury, and I think Bret Michaels is trying too hard to overcompensate.  And his drummer was named Rikki Rockett.

And even if KISS was straight, their genre of music was still called "glam", which carries a certain stigma with it :fag:

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

Never ever heard KISS categorized as glam. 

Glam was the New York Dolls.  KISS drew some influence from the costumes, etc. but the music itself was never glam. 

KISS helped create metal.  Arena rock.