It's not feelings; it's logic. The car was in operation at the time, stopped or otherwise.
Too hot for immediate consumption? I agree. Dangerous? If used or handled inappropriately. I'm sure that a fresh pot of anybody's coffee can be dangerous if poured on the soft tissues of the inner thighs and genital region. It's absurd to think otherwise, and holding McDonald's accountable to this extent exceeds reason.
Misconceptions... Even the non-fictitious cases seem to identify issues with these "norms", and I can tell you that my personal experiences with these "norms" haven't exactly been fair or reasonable.
> Again, a case where you clearly admit relevant facts really don't mean much to you.
> Again, most coffee is too hot for immediate consumption, and most would even injury you if you poured a large quantiy on you. There was medical tesitmony in the McD's case on the different types of injuries that would occur and how long the coffee would have to be in contact with the skin at various tempratures. It was plainly evident to the jury, and the judge, that there was not reasonable excuse for serving coffee
that hot espeically in light of the fact that they'd been put on notice with many prior complaints.
> You're seriously going to stick with grossly misreported stories to support your agenda? Fiction (because that's what it is) identifies real issues? You're serious? You struck me as smarter than that.
I'd be glad to hear about your personal experiences. That might shed some real light on all this!