Politically speaking, absolutes, and "all or nothing" gets you beat every time. Guns and hunting are issues that the proponents have to be willing to compromise on, and take baby steps at times.
Again, I strongly disagree on both points. The
absolutes, and "all or nothing" gets you beat every time only happens when you're on the wrong side of the position. As for
compromise, you can't be serious. They took their baby-steps during he Clinton years banning high-capacity magazines and declaring certain hunting firearms as
assault rifles. Today, they're calling the device used in the attempted bombing in New York a WMD, but we can't agree on the same classification of the thousands of
more powerful weapons confiscated and destroyed in Iraq that were found.