Bama came out a little rusty, spotted Texas twice in the redzone, 0-0. And Texas was in complete control????? We're gonna disagree here JA. Ive seen the replay a dozen times. It was just a matter of time - with or without McCoy - that Bama got their footing in that game. I thought the hit was clean - sorry, it was. This is football, not cheerleading. Texas did the same thing to Sam Bradford so Mack and the Steer Queer Nation should understand fully. I honestly think the better team won. I will call a spade a spade.
IMHO - Bama's D was better than OU's. And we know OU shut McCoy and UT down. They were lucky to win that game. They were also damn lucky to win the Big 12 title. Neb and OU both had stout D's and Texas had trouble with both. Good D > Good O. I think Bama could have made that game much worse in the 3rd quarter than they did.
Someone else may have said it, but I didn't say Texas was in complete control. I said they came to play, nothing more. My point was only that early on, there was no reason to think Texas was going to be out-manned. I also noted that the hit was clean, obviously so, I think. (and for what it's worth, I haven't met a Texas fan out here that thinks the hit was anything but a clean tackle...I've only heard that from anti-Alabama fans).
But I'm not sure you can really say anything about that game was inevitable. Alabama got rolling a little more offensively, but was that partially due to the fact that the UT offense was three-and-out over and over? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe they would have gotten going anyway. But maybe they got going because the UT defense was on the field a lot and Alabama got a whole lot of chances to get going. Point is, we only know what did happen, we'll never know what would have happened.
As for looking back at "lucky to win" games, you could just as easily point to Alabama vs Auburn and Alabama vs Tennessee. So that's a wash. I'm not someone that's idiotic enough to say that had Colt played UT would have definitely won. That's crazy. But I think it's equally crazy to say Alabama
definitely would have won even if McCoy played. Like I said, he was their Lebron, and while Alabama
may have beaten a Texas team WITH McCoy, all we know for sure is that they were better than a Texas team without McCoy. So yeah, the better team won, no question. It wasn't an upset. But the losing team, without any question, didn't field their best player, which has to be considered.