I know it was a half-joking dig in passing, but the point is, this is typical of the slams you hear from bama fans.
.
And it's retarded. It seems to me that someone would spend more time poking fun at the idiot for failing at the smack talk then trying to defend Auburn's name.
I agree that Prowler can make a dumb post every now and then. I don't see how this is one of them.
We view this differently then. If someone wants to make an argument and really attack a point, then I'm fine with it. As I've already pointed out, he didn't. He took the
"I know you are, but what am I" and the
"well, you started it" approach, which I consider to be extremely idiotic. If that wasn't enough, sticking with the elementary theme, he's now mooooing. A very effective way to prove a point in 3rd grade. Grownups? Not so much.
What is dumb is that we're still talking about it, and even worse that everyone is attacking Prowler for responding to a bammer making a "cow college" comment. Some of you have Kaos-itus. Taking the side of a bammer slamming Auburn if it means a chance to call Prowler an idiot.
Priorities, man.
Those people don't spend near as much time siding with a bammer as you do running in blindly to defend every stupid comment he makes. Furthermore,
those people didn't display any characteristics of someone with Kaos-itus. The didn't make a single comment towards Prowler, where Kaos would have completely undressed his argument, broke down exactly why it was a complete failure and lambasted you with sancho lines for running in, yet again, to defend a stupid comment.
For phuk's sake, is it really so noble to take the side of a fellow fan even if the point he's trying to make could possibly be the dumbest since Tom Cruise decided to start a church? poop. If I took that approach with some of Birmingham's multi-personality posts I'd have well over 10,000.
Priorities, indeed.