Anyone think anything significant comes out of this?
I did notice one fact I didn't know. The football program was last sanctioned in 2001 for various violations. If they find them responsible for any of the Bush stuff, it would fall within the 5 year "repeat offender" time frame, which could make things interesting.
It's not the popular opinion, but I don't see any reason why the NCAA would let them off should they find something. People point to money, but I have yet to have someone make a direct correlation of how USC on probation for a few years hurts the NCAA financially in a significant way.
TV deals are negotiated and signed with conferences. Bowls are not sanctioned by the NCAA. The NCAA makes a ton off the CBS NCAA basketball tournament TV deal. But I'm not sure how USC directly helps the NCAA make money in a significant way.
And if that's the case, why would they avoid bringing down the hammer if that's what's warranted?
Opinions?