Why The Negativity?

Fucking ridiculous.

Guy gives his opinion, it doesn't jibe with yours and this is your response.

This is why this pathetic cry for attention in the guise of a thread should have been deleted from the start.

Kaos · « **Reply #25 on:** January 13, 2010, 09:58:42 AM »

Quote from: GH2001 on January 13, 2010, 09:24:18 AM

dude lives in his own little world.....

To be fair, so do Chopper and Prowler.

None of the divergent planes are any more connected to reality than the other.

djsimp · « **Reply #26 on:** January 13, 2010, 10:04:04 AM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 13, 2010, 09:58:42 AM

To be fair, so do Chopper and Prowler.

None of the divergent planes are any more connected to reality than the other.

I think he was referring to the one comment from greasy that didnt make any sense.

Quote

Well that proves that you are not on the side of Auburn.

Of course, I have been known to not make much sense to myself at times.

Kaos · « **Reply #27 on:** January 13, 2010, 10:22:09 AM »

Quote from: djsimp41 on January 13, 2010, 10:04:04 AM

I think he was referring to the one comment from greasy that didnt make any sense.
Of course, I have been known to not make much sense to myself at times.

I make plenty of sense to myself. Not sure how that translates.

djsimp · « **Reply #28 on:** January 13, 2010, 10:33:39 AM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 13, 2010, 10:22:09 AM

I make plenty of sense to myself. Not sure how that translates.

So you've never said to yourself, "What the hell are you doing"?

Kaos · « **Reply #29 on:** January 13, 2010, 10:42:43 AM »

Quote from: djsimp41 on January 13, 2010, 10:33:39 AM

So you've never said to yourself, "What the hell are you doing"?

Nope.

Now after I've destroyed some poor simp or done something that wasn't entirely constructive, I may have said "What the hell did you just do?" But never the other.

djsimp · « **Reply #30 on:** January 13, 2010, 10:49:09 AM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 13, 2010, 10:42:43 AM

I've destroyed some poor simp

Kaos · « **Reply #31 on:** January 13, 2010, 12:36:42 PM »

Oh fuck a mallard. Call the fucking PC police.

Sorry, but simp is not a tainted word. It's short for simpleton, which is a perfectly acceptable and legitimate word.

sim·ple·ton (smpl-tn)
n.
A person who is felt to be deficient in judgment, good sense, or intelligence; a fool.

We got plenty of simps around here.

wesfau2 · « **Reply #32 on:** January 13, 2010, 12:40:41 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 13, 2010, 12:36:42 PM

Oh fuck a mallard. Call the fucking PC police.

Sorry, but simp is not a tainted word. It's short for simpleton, which is a perfectly acceptable and legitimate word.

sim·ple·ton (smpl-tn)
n.
A person who is felt to be deficient in judgment, good sense, or intelligence; a fool.

We got plenty of simps around here.

Hey, hair trigger, check out dude's username.

Jumbo · « **Reply #33 on:** January 13, 2010, 12:44:16 PM »

Quote from: wesfau2 on January 13, 2010, 12:40:41 PM

Hey, hair trigger, check out dude's username.

Dont cloud ~~God~~ Kaos with the lost irony.

Kaos · « **Reply #34 on:** January 13, 2010, 12:58:40 PM »

Quote from: wesfau2 on January 13, 2010, 12:40:41 PM

Hey, hair trigger, check out dude's username.

Well fuck me running. Which should be easier since I've slowed down in the last few years.

Damn.

djsimp · « **Reply #35 on:** January 13, 2010, 02:07:56 PM »

Quote from: wesfau2 on January 13, 2010, 12:40:41 PM

Hey, hair trigger, check out dude's username.

Yeah, check out dude's username.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #36 on:** January 13, 2010, 04:58:07 PM »

There's only one constant attention whore on this board, and his name rhymes with Kaos.

Quote from: Greaseyweasel on January 12, 2010, 11:43:42 PM

We have a highly rated recruiting class, except it completely ignores the massive shortcomings in our program, but hey!! it hasa bunch of pretty lil stars in it. The "leader" aint leading. The objective crowd can see that the chiziktonians on the other hand, well Auburn will be much better off when they too are culled from the herd.

The bolded is what's fucking ridiculous. What's pathetic and ridiculous is getting chased around here by YOU and bashed on sight.

RWS · « **Reply #37 on:** January 13, 2010, 05:38:19 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 13, 2010, 04:58:07 PM

There's only one constant attention whore on this board, and his name rhymes with Kaos.

The bolded is what's fucking ridiculous. What's pathetic and ridiculous is getting chased around here by YOU and bashed on sight.

I can be a homer right with the best of them, but I can't figure that statement out either. Right now for the 2010 class, AU has the following: One QB, one RB, two WR, four OL, two TE, four DL, four LB, two DB, five ATH, and a kicker. There will be a few additions as well, I'm sure.

Just exactly how the fuck does that class ignore a shortcoming? Especially when the QB, RB, and one OL are all 5* guys? On paper, thats a pretty balanced and talented class. Now, a year or so down the road, if say half of these guys don't work out, then AU is pretty fucked. There will certainly be some that won't work out, and that happens in every class everywhere. Thats fine. Please explain what position is being neglected here. I'm just not really seeing it.

AUTailgatingRules · « **Reply #38 on:** January 13, 2010, 05:43:44 PM »

Quote from: RWS on January 13, 2010, 05:38:19 PM

I can be a homer right with the best of them, but I can't figure that statement out either. Right now for the 2010 class, AU has the following: One QB, one RB, two WR, four OL, two TE, four DL, four LB, two DB, five ATH, and a kicker. There will be a few additions as well, I'm sure.

Just exactly how the fuck does that class ignore a shortcoming? Especially when the QB, RB, and one OL are all 5* guys? On paper, thats a pretty balanced and talented class. Now, a year or so down the road, if say half of these guys don't work out, then AU is pretty fucked. There will certainly be some that won't work out, and that happens in every class everywhere. Thats fine. Please explain what position is being neglected here. I'm just not really seeing it.

1. Dude, Chizik is a moron and has no idea what AU needs
2. Dude, Chizik is a moron and will fuck up everything
3. Dude, did I mention Chizik is a moron

AUChizad · « **Reply #39 on:** January 13, 2010, 05:46:38 PM »

Quote from: RWS on January 13, 2010, 05:38:19 PM

I can be a homer right with the best of them, but I can't figure that statement out either. Right now for the 2010 class, AU has the following: One QB, one RB, two WR, four OL, two TE, four DL, four LB, two DB, five ATH, and a kicker. There will be a few additions as well, I'm sure.

Just exactly how the fuck does that class ignore a shortcoming? Especially when the QB, RB, and one OL are all 5* guys? On paper, thats a pretty balanced and talented class. Now, a year or so down the road, if say half of these guys don't work out, then AU is pretty fucked. There will certainly be some that won't work out, and that happens in every class everywhere. Thats fine. Please explain what position is being neglected here. I'm just not really seeing it.

It didn't make a shred of sense. Greasey clearly barely knows how to spell his own name, let alone a damn thing about football.

He's obviously grasping for straws because he predicted we'd go 2-10 this year, and have the worst recruiting class in Auburn history. And not a casual in-passing kind of thing. He said it in every fucking thread on this board in some form or fashion. Now that he has been proven completely and utterly wrong, he resorts to babbling incoherently as excuses that "make sense to him".

Then K-Sancho has to come defend him, as if he made any sense whatsoever. (See what I did there?)