Fuck it. Let's get it all out there on the table.
Why the negativity? Is that your motherfucking question? Pretty simple.
Because some of you see anything that doesn't fit your own cockeyed perception of how things are as "negativity."
Auburn gave up 600 fucking passing yards to Northwestern. That sucks. But if you say it sucks, some of you flaming unicorn riding fairies immediately start your pussy-ass bitching.
"Why do you have to be so negative," you pussy-achers whine. "Don't you know we only had one linebacker and our defensive back played with a swollen scrotum?"
So you've justified it to yourself by whatever means you choose. Now anyone who doesn't kowtow to your self-crafted position is "negative." Fuck that. Fuck it ten ways to Sunday.
You, Chop, and a couple of others have had your dicks on full Viagra/Cialis alert since about two weeks after Chizik was hired. You've denigrated everything that happened in the previous ten years and taken shots at Tuberville -- who was to many of us as stand up an Auburn guy as there was. He kept us OUT of trouble -- the only coach since I've been alive who was there more than four years to manage that feat -- and he kept us competitive with the exception of his final year (which was really about four plays from being a typical eight or nine win season). But that now means nothing because he was a BBQ loving lazy ass. Right.
It's not enough for you to say Chizik is doing well, you have to pad it with shots at Tuberville as you do. That's pathetic and it's full-on retard Bama mentality. It's the same kind of shit they did with Shula - who wasn't half the coach Tuberville was and may or may not be twice the coach Chizik is.
Anything that's REMOTELY tinged with objectivity is immediately shouted down by you and a couple of others with your patented dullard hammer.
It's NOT negative for the most part, it's just DIFFERENT than whatever fairyland perception you happen to have.
Some of GW's stuff -- no, let's be fair, 99% of it -- is way over the edge. His delivery could use some work. Doesn't mean everything he says is shit because he happens to disagree with YOU.
Same with a few others who attempt to offer an opinion from the other side of the fence only to be met with dino-rants from a couple of dimbulbs here.
You call it negativity because it doesn't jibe with your particular world view. That's ignorant. It's the same kind of ridiculous bullshit the democrats do when a Republican makes a point. Rather than addressing the legitimacy of the issue, they start pussy-whining about "hate speech" and "mean spirited" manure.
If you disagree with somebody that's fine. You can disagree wholeheartedly. But your doobie-doobie-doo method of "debate" is insulting and adds zero, zip, zilch, nada, nothing to the discussion.
Negative, is a relative term depending on where you stand. GW is more "negative" than me. So is Sensi. Of course they'd probably argue that it's YOU who are negative because you don't bother to understand the argument before you start bulling around. I'm more negative than you according to your definition. But you are more negative than some I've seen. So who's negative? Anybody who doesn't agree with your position? Pffffffffffttttt.
Delete the thread. It's worthless.
140 Replies
19810 Views