Latest and greatest on Newton

jmar · « **Reply #140 on:** January 03, 2010, 02:01:48 PM »

I don't know, it may be that Curley's colossal head doesn't fit NCAA standards as a tee. Officers, please check into this.

Token · « **Reply #141 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:04:49 PM »

Quote from: The Prowler on January 03, 2010, 01:51:55 PM

First thing, this was Cody Parkey's first time to kick not using a block. Secondly, they had two days to practice the timing between the snapper, the holder and the kicker.

Did any of the other kickers get extra practice time? If not, did they have any problems? I didn't see the game so I don't know, but that looks like major league spinning. I mean, if all the other kickers have same practice time and didn't have those problems, I don't really see how that could even be considered. Unless you're agreeing that he may be worse than the other kickers.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #142 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:09:54 PM »

Quote from: Token on January 04, 2010, 01:04:49 PM

Did any of the other kickers get extra practice time? If not, did they have any problems? I didn't see the game so I don't know, but that looks like major league spinning. I mean, if all the other kickers have same practice time and didn't have those problems, I don't really see how that could even be considered. Unless you're agreeing that he may be worse than the other kickers.

Say what you want Token, but actually being at the game (as I was), it was CLEAR that Parkey, the holder and snapper were having timing issues. He stutter started several times.

He came out just before the second half and was roping some kicks from 45-55... Out of about 7 that he kicked, he missed one.

If Parkey has issues, the game on Saturday isn't going to tell you why.

Kaos · « **Reply #143 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:10:10 PM »

Quote from: The Prowler on January 03, 2010, 01:51:55 PM

I agree that Cody was a little off yesterday. But, you do realize that it doesn't take that much to cause the kick to be a little off, a slight tilt will cause the kick to be off...and that's when the Snapper (Dakota Moseley) and the Placekick Holder are in sync. If they aren't in sync, then that will throw the kicker's timing off, usually causing the kicks to be off.

The 1st FG attempt was tipped at the line. The 2nd was misshandled by the Placekick Holder causing him to pick the ball up and try to run it. The 3rd was off because of the snap by Dakota and the hold being off sync, causing Cody to check up before he attempted the kick. All of those issues are very, very easy to correct.

First thing, this was Cody Parkey's first time to kick not using a block. Secondly, they had two days to practice the timing between the snapper, the holder and the kicker.

Sometimes it's better to just shut up and not say anything.

But not Prowler... you got to keep digging and digging and digging.

The kid had a bad game. Period. Everything else you said was ridiculous spin. It might even be true, but it just looks pa-fucking-thetic.

Kaos · « **Reply #144 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:12:07 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:09:54 PM

Say what you want Token, but actually being at the game (as I was), it was CLEAR that Parkey, the holder and snapper were having timing issues. He stutter started several times.

He came out just before the second half and was roping some kicks from 45-55... Out of about 7 that he kicked, he missed one.

If Parkey has issues, the game on Saturday isn't going to tell you why.

Oh dear God.

If Prowler says the kid got sparkle chips in his eyes from the too-fresh paint on his helmet you can bank on Chopper riding up on his broke-down mule to provide support. He was THERE. He SAW the sparkle chips fall into his field of vision, you dumbass.

Saniflush · « **Reply #145 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:14:52 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:12:07 PM

Oh dear God.

If Prowler says the kid got sparkle chips in his eyes from the too-fresh paint on his helmet you can bank on Chopper riding up on his broke-down mule to provide support. He was THERE. He SAW the sparkle chips fall into his field of vision, you dumbass.

Is that anything like the pixie dust strippers give off?

Kaos · « **Reply #146 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:15:55 PM »

Quote from: Saniflush on January 04, 2010, 01:14:52 PM

Is that anything like the pixie dust strippers give off?

Very similar. Also very hard to remove from clothes.

Saniflush · « **Reply #147 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:20:35 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:15:55 PM

Very similar. Also very hard to remove from clothes.

You just need practice my young padawan learner.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #148 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:24:39 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:12:07 PM

Oh dear God.

If Prowler says the kid got sparkle chips in his eyes from the too-fresh paint on his helmet you can bank on Chopper riding up on his broke-down mule to provide support. He was THERE. He SAW the sparkle chips fall into his field of vision, you dumbass.

Yeah. Since I was there, I shouldn't say anything about what I saw when directly talking with Token...

I hear ya though.... good one. Sparkle chips...nice. :thumbsup:

Kaos · « **Reply #149 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:30:40 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:24:39 PM

Yeah. Since I was there, I shouldn't say anything about what I saw when directly talking with Token...

I hear ya though.... good one. Sparkle chips...nice. :thumbsup:

No, we've already established that anything personally witnessed is worthless. You set those ground rules yourself.

You also clearly established a pattern of rushing to Prowler's defense no matter how stupid his position (and he to yours). Therefore anything you say related to this topic -- regardless of the validity -- is rendered irrelevant. Even if 100% accurate, the taint of bias destroys the impact of anything you may or may not have observed.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #150 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:33:34 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:30:40 PM

No, we've already established that anything personally witnessed is worthless. You set those ground rules yourself.

So you've personally witnessed Tyrik Rollison? Oh...NO? Okay. We're done with that BS assertion and mischaracterization of my argument against you there.

Saniflush · « **Reply #151 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:35:37 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:30:40 PM

No, we've already established that anything personally witnessed is worthless. You set those ground rules yourself.

You also clearly established a pattern of rushing to Prowler's defense no matter how stupid his position (and he to yours). Therefore anything you say related to this topic -- regardless of the validity -- is rendered irrelevant. Even if 100% accurate, the taint of bias destroys the impact of anything you may or may not have observed.

You said taint.

Kaos · « **Reply #152 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:40:21 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:33:34 PM

So you've personally witnessed Tyrik Rollison? Oh...NO? Okay. We're done with that BS assertion and mischaracterization of my argument against you there.

You don't even know what you're talking about any more.

jmar · « **Reply #153 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:41:39 PM »

Taint no arguing ta do till we see 'em both play.

Token · « **Reply #154 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:43:13 PM »

Quote from: jmar on January 04, 2010, 01:41:39 PM

Taint no arguing ta do till we see 'em both play.

We already did. And one of them stunk it up.

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #155 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:44:26 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:30:40 PM

You also clearly established a pattern of rushing to Prowler's defense no matter how stupid his position (and he to yours). Therefore anything you say related to this topic -- regardless of the validity -- is rendered irrelevant. Even if 100% accurate, the taint of bias destroys the impact of anything you may or may not have observed.

The only pattern that's been established is that you can't handle me posting. If I post something. ANYTHING. You're there to try and debunk it, make fun of it, or egg me into an argument.

Just stop.

Quote from: Kaos on January 04, 2010, 01:40:21 PM

You don't even know what you're talking about any more.

Go ahead. Spin. You have NOT seen Tyrik Rollison in person. THAT was the debate you're drudging up. You said he will never....blah blah blah. We've all seen it. However, you'd NEVER seen him. Bringing THAT debate up, because I personally watched Parkey on Saturday is just stupid.

However, go ahead and do it... You know you're going to

AuburnChopper 3.0 · « **Reply #156 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:45:36 PM »

Quote from: Token on January 04, 2010, 01:43:13 PM

We already did. And one of them stunk it up.

You might not have seen this Token... Kaos had to play around and it got buried...

Say what you want Token, but actually being at the game (as I was), it was CLEAR that Parkey, the holder and snapper were having timing issues. He stutter started several times.

He came out just before the second half and was roping some kicks from 45-55... Out of about 7 that he kicked, he missed one.

If Parkey has issues, the game on Saturday isn't going to tell you why.

Kaos · « **Reply #157 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:51:44 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:45:36 PM

You might not have seen this Token... Kaos had to play around and it got buried...

Say what you want Token, but actually being at the game (as I was), it was CLEAR that Parkey, the holder and snapper were having timing issues. He stutter started several times.

He came out just before the second half and was roping some kicks from 45-55... Out of about 7 that he kicked, he missed one.

If Parkey has issues, the game on Saturday isn't going to tell you why.

It was a fail the first time -- and Token saw it then, too.

Token · « **Reply #158 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:53:58 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:45:36 PM

You might not have seen this Token... Kaos had to play around and it got buried...

Say what you want Token, but actually being at the game (as I was), it was CLEAR that Parkey, the holder and snapper were having timing issues. He stutter started several times.

He came out just before the second half and was roping some kicks from 45-55... Out of about 7 that he kicked, he missed one.

If Parkey has issues, the game on Saturday isn't going to tell you why.

Kicking in pregame is different than kicking from a snap with people in front of you.

Maybe Cody just had a bad day. I'm just saying the "they didn't have enough time to practice" excuse is pure spin when they got the same amount of time as everyone else. What's good for one is good for the other, unless one isn't as good as other.

With that said, Tiffin looked like the worst kicker in the history of kickers his freshman season against Arky. He turned out pretty good. Well, except for and extra point here and there.

Kaos · « **Reply #159 on:** January 04, 2010, 01:57:43 PM »

Quote from: AuburnChopper on January 04, 2010, 01:44:26 PM

The only pattern that's been established is that you can't handle me posting. If I post something. ANYTHING. You're there to try and debunk it, make fun of it, or egg me into an argument.

Just stop.

Go ahead. Spin. You have NOT seen Tyrik Rollison in person. THAT was the debate you're drudging up. You said he will never....blah blah blah. We've all seen it. However, you'd NEVER seen him. Bringing THAT debate up, because I personally watched Parkey on Saturday is just stupid.

However, go ahead and do it... You know you're going to

See? This is what I've been saying for a while now. You just proved it.

You don't see or hear anything but the buzzing between your own ears. You make something up, decide how it applies and then run with it. What was actually said is of no consequence to you, because you're charging ahead trying to butt down imaginary windmills with your head.

You don't have any idea what you're talking about. Nobody said a word about Rollison. Your ass is chapped because I said he wasn't going to be the alpha-omega some (two) of you tried to spin him into being and now that he's gotten himself in trouble and another recruit may be taking the reins, you're pissed at Kaos for being "right." ** Poor you.

What you're trying to do here is just silly. Nobody brought Rollison into the discussion but you.

** For the record, I am not claiming to have been right about my general feeling on Rollison. Merely pointing out that the illusion of rightness (which has not come close to being determined yet) is what has Chop's ass in a knit.