I'd give them all a B-. Mullen and Chizel were playing with players recruited for a different scheme than how they ran their teams. Tennessee had "decent players," but they just didn't mesh well. It didn't work out for Kiffen.
We were inconsistent, but showed moments of greatness. Somewhere I think there is a balance of players and coaching.
Kiffen ran his mouth but his players never backed him up on it with their performance. His daddy saved his ass with some sick defensive coaching IMO.
Mullen... he just never had any talent to work with. I'll be interested to see what he recruits and what he does with it. Recruiting for MSU has to just be plain tough. Who the hell wants to go to Starkville. 0_o
Chizel did alright. Like you said, he beat both Mullen and Kiffen. AU had a strong showing against UA, but just got tired. We played well against UT, UA had a much worse time with UT than we did. Inconsistency is where Chizel's score should just drop.