Whatever, douche.
Facts are a bitch, aren't they? If Rhodes wins 5 games or more this season, what is the excuse going to be for why he can win with the same players Chizik couldn't?
The point being, you and the other tard's argument was that 5-19 at Iowa State means he's going to fall on his face in Auburn. He probably wouldn't luck into a single win all year. Because Iowa State played lesser competition, blah blah blah. Because lack of success at Iowa State is directly transferable to lack of success at Auburn.
The matter is I believe 5-19 is really indicitave of his coaching there. As I said in another thread, you put Urban Meyer, Steve Spurrier, Nick Saban, Pete Carrol, etc up there, I bet they can manage better than 5 wins in two seasons even if they are getting the same caliber of talent as ISU is getting today. I think those four coaches were, for the most part, pretty hot and had good records transitioning from assistants to head coaches. I never said he probably wouldn't luck into a single win all year. Thats simply you dramatizing it.
When did Iowa State ever blow anyone out, much less a team that won their bowl game last year, in their season opener.
No idea, and don't really care for that matter.
Chizik is undefeated so far. 100% winning percentage. And an impressive win, it was.
Ok.
You're well on your way to that being exposed as a ridiculous argument.
One win against an overmatched Louisiana Tech and I'm well on my way to my argument that he isn't that great of a head coach being exposed? Oooooook then. He certainly didn't fall flat on his face against them, but hell, you guys were ready for a MNC appearance after the ULM last season because everything looked so damn good. I'm certainly not holding ULM against Chizik and his staff, simply illustrating that shit can happen.