So, then what penalty should Alabama receive?
Although the first time I asked had some humor, I was completely serious.
Why is Alabama appealing the ruling? Because the penalty doesn't punish the crime? What penalty would they rather have?
You have to realize that Alabama doesn't think that the vacated wins are a bad punishment in regards to fitting the "crime". They think vacated wins are a bad punishment for a crime where a punishment was already given, i.e. suspending the players. That plus the inconsistency of how they've dealt with similar, if not more severe cases, is means for an appeal.
I don't see anything wrong with this appeal, after reading the actual document I honestly think they will receive the vacated wins back.