Which part of the first post does not describe Chizik or Sabbun? I'd say the comparison BEING MADE is undoubtedly valid. Maybe not your straw man.
Chizik is the fucking straw man. And the tin man, too. Only time will tell if he's also that retarded lion.
The comparison is completely invalid because you ignore everything else that refutes the argument. Saban's NFL experience has no relation to Chizik's college experience. If Saban had never coached college and that was his only experience, then you'd have a point. Sadly, you don't. It wasn't Saban's first two years as coach. There is ZERO correlation there.
If you want to drag the exceptions like Mack Brown in there, then go for it. It would be a valid comparison. When you're using exceptions to prove a rule, however, your argument has already failed.