Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Walter E. Williams

Saniflush

  • Pledge Master
  • ****
  • 21656
Walter E. Williams
« on: January 30, 2009, 02:16:30 PM »
Conservative writer I just stumbled across.  Good stuff.  Here is a sample.

Quote
Walter E. Williams
There Is No Santa

Here is what my George Mason University colleague Professor Richard Wagner wrote, which was published by Office of the House Republican Leader: "Any so-called stimulus program is a ruse. The government can increase its spending only by reducing private spending equivalently. Whether government finances its added spending by increasing taxes, by borrowing, or by inflating the currency, the added spending will be offset by reduced private spending. Furthermore, private spending is generally more efficient than the government spending that would replace it because people act more carefully when they spend their own money than when they spend other people's money." A short translation of Wagner's comment is: There is no Santa Claus or Tooth Fairy. Let's examine the ruse.

Suppose the value of all that we will produce in 2009, our gross domestic product (GDP), totals $14 trillion. There cannot be any disagreement that if Congress spends $4 trillion, of necessity there is only $10 trillion left over for us to spend privately. In other words, if Congress is going to spend $4 trillion, it must find a way to get us to spend $4 trillion less. The most open and aboveboard method to force us to spend less privately is to tax us to the tune of $4 trillion.

You might say, "Congress doesn't have to tax us $4 trillion. They could tax us $3 trillion and run a $1 trillion budget deficit." You have that wrong. There is no way for Congress to spend $4 trillion out of our 2009 $14 trillion GDP by getting us to spend only $3 trillion less privately. It has to be $4 trillion less. Another method to force us to spend less privately is to print money and inflate the currency. Rising prices reduce our ability to spend privately since each dollar we hold will not buy as much. Another way is for Congress to borrow, thereby reducing our ability to spend privately. By the way, all of this means that in any real economic sense the federal budget is always balanced. That is, if Congress spends $4 trillion we must privately spend $4 trillion less whether it is accomplished through taxation, inflation or borrowing.

The stimulus package being discussed is politically smart but economically stupid. It's that bedeviling, omnipresent Santa Claus and Tooth Fairy problem again. Let's say that Congress taxes you $500 to put toward creating construction jobs building our infrastructure. The beneficiaries will be quite visible, namely men employed building a road. The victims of Congress are invisible and are only revealed by asking what you would have done with the $500 if it were not taxed away from you. Whatever you would have spent it on would have contributed to someone's employment. That person is invisible. Politicians love it when the victims of their policies are invisible and the beneficiaries visible. Why? Because the beneficiaries know for whom to vote and the victims do not know who is to blame for their plight.

In stimulus package language, if Congress taxes to hand out money, one person is stimulated at the expense of another, who pays the tax, who is unstimulated. A visual representation of the stimulus package is: Imagine you see a person at work taking buckets of water from the deep end of a swimming pool and dumping them into the shallow end in an attempt to make it deeper. You would deem him stupid. That scenario is equivalent to what Congress and the new president proposes for the economy. A far more important measure that Congress can take toward a healthy economy is to ensure that the 2003 tax cuts don't expire in 2010 as scheduled. If not, there are 15 separate taxes scheduled to rise in 2010, costing Americans $200 billion a year in increased taxes. In the face of a recession, we don't need that.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-williams.html
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Hey my friends are the ones that wanted to eat at that shitty hole in the wall that only served bread and wine.  What kind of brick and mud business model is that.  Stick to the cart if that's all you're going to serve.  Then that dude came in with like 12 other people, and some of them weren't even wearing shoes, and the restaurant sat them right across from us. It was gross, and they were all stinky and dirty.  Then dude starts talking about eating his body and drinking his blood...I almost lost it.  That's the last supper I'll ever have there, and I hope he dies a horrible death."

Tarheel

  • Pledge
  • ***
  • 4166
  • "I'm not really wise, but I can be cranky."
Re: Walter E. Williams
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2009, 03:29:30 AM »
Excellent article, Sani.  Thanks for posting it.

There's one factor I think that perhaps has not been examined in this analysis and that is the alternative view of wealth creation in a free market.  One is that there's a zero sum (or finite amount) of wealth and the other is an infinite amount of potential wealth.  The latter, and I think more practical, economic theory is one that was advocated more by Reagan.  I'm probably explaining it poorly but I'm tired and it's late (or early) depending on your point of view.  Anyway, it seems to me that Dr. Williams is explaining this theory more in terms of the former viewpoint.

Again, I meant to post a comment on this earlier but in my excitement over the election of Michael Steele to head the RNC I overlooked some compelling political posts like this one.

I wonder if you (or others here) know that Walter Williams occasionally fills in for Rush?  That's where I first heard of him.  He's a solid conservative regardless of my very mild criticism here.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me. 
-Ayn Rand

The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.
-The Right Honourable Margaret Thatcher

The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.
-Milton Friedman

The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'
-Ronald Reagan

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-Thomas Jefferson

Tiger Wench

  • ******
  • 10352
  • Does this armour make my ass look big?
Re: Walter E. Williams
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2009, 03:12:27 PM »
He is also black, I believe?  Another Uncle Tom... how sad... SARCASM
« Last Edit: January 31, 2009, 03:13:00 PM by Tiger Wench »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Tarheel

  • Pledge
  • ***
  • 4166
  • "I'm not really wise, but I can be cranky."
Re: Walter E. Williams
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2009, 04:10:41 PM »
He is also black, I believe?  Another Uncle Tom... how sad...
...


Why yes, Dr. Williams IS black, indeed.

« Last Edit: January 31, 2009, 04:33:18 PM by Tarheel »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me. 
-Ayn Rand

The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.
-The Right Honourable Margaret Thatcher

The government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem.
-Milton Friedman

The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'
-Ronald Reagan

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-Thomas Jefferson