OK...give me the rest of the list.
I don't think that you have to pass on the ones you want.
There are lots of coaches on the staff. I think they can spread the duties around sufficiently. Call me a blind optimist if you must, but I'll just call you a blind pessimist.
I disagree.
Then you disagree with yourself. You said Texas and OU can fill their roster without leaving the state. That implies that they get who they want from there. That being the case, then AU would be at a significant disadvantage in that recruiting area.
As for the list? Since 1981, Auburn's had several ten and 11 win teams, two undefeated teams and three teams that could/should have won national titles. Georgia's had a ton of success. Alabama had the (alleged) number one recruiting class in the country last year. How many were from Texas? One. Round Square or some such shit. Never heard of him. How many were from states outside AL, MS, FL, GA, TN, LA? Three. One was the Round Square dude, the other was a kicker from Saban's home town in WV and the third was the son of a guy who played for Saban at Michigan State.
LSU has Texans on the roster but it makes sense geographically for them to do so. They are a border state. If Auburn were LSU, I'd expect them to recruit Texas.
Florida picked up a few (I think you said seven) but three or four of those are freshmen lured by the national prestige that UF created by winning -- with players primarily from the state of Florida. None of the Texans on the roster were significant contributors to the team. A senior running back who sat behind a freshman (from Florida) was about the biggest deal. Every Texas native on Florida's roster could have vanished into the night and nobody would have known.
Why are we still talking about this?