Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Snag Stats

CCTAU

  • *
  • 13075
  • War Eagle!
Re: Snag Stats
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2024, 12:14:25 PM »
His biggest fault here is NOT getting a portal QB this past winter/spring.

In Hugh's defense, the guy did say this offense is not that hard.
So Hugh figured a number QBs have gotten it. PT should be fine...

As for Hank, we knew the increase in SEC speed would get him some. We just didn't figure on the lucky bounce, the fumble, and the INT that wasn't, yet was.

I'd roll with Hank and have him speed up his game. I wish he would have stuck with him against Arky and let him finish the game at SEC speed. I think it would have done wonders for him in the future.

We keep talking about an RPO QB. Just what is that? An option QB? I guy who can hand it off or throw it? A guy who runs it what % of time?

I see Hank as a guy who gets it. He can make the RPO reads. We did fine when running the RPO. It was when we started the drop back stuff that we saw issues. And then it was mostly the speed of the game.

I'd roll with Hank. 
 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Five statements of WISDOM
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friends, is the beginning of the end of any nation.

Re: Snag Stats
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2024, 12:20:42 PM »
In Hugh's defense, the guy did say this offense is not that hard.
So Hugh figured a number QBs have gotten it. PT should be fine...

As for Hank, we knew the increase in SEC speed would get him some. We just didn't figure on the lucky bounce, the fumble, and the INT that wasn't, yet was.

I'd roll with Hank and have him speed up his game. I wish he would have stuck with him against Arky and let him finish the game at SEC speed. I think it would have done wonders for him in the future.

We keep talking about an RPO QB. Just what is that? An option QB? I guy who can hand it off or throw it? A guy who runs it what % of time?

I see Hank as a guy who gets it. He can make the RPO reads. We did fine when running the RPO. It was when we started the drop back stuff that we saw issues. And then it was mostly the speed of the game.

I'd roll with Hank.

Agree.  Roll with Hank & let him develop. 

I am willing to bet we only see Thorne from here on out this season, though.  Just when you thought we had all seen enough from the 5th year player. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Don't rush me, sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.

Snaggletiger

  • *
  • 44627
  • My Fighting Pearls
Re: Snag Stats
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2024, 12:51:39 PM »
In Hugh's defense, the guy did say this offense is not that hard.
So Hugh figured a number QBs have gotten it. PT should be fine...

As for Hank, we knew the increase in SEC speed would get him some. We just didn't figure on the lucky bounce, the fumble, and the INT that wasn't, yet was.

I'd roll with Hank and have him speed up his game. I wish he would have stuck with him against Arky and let him finish the game at SEC speed. I think it would have done wonders for him in the future.

We keep talking about an RPO QB. Just what is that? An option QB? I guy who can hand it off or throw it? A guy who runs it what % of time?

I see Hank as a guy who gets it. He can make the RPO reads. We did fine when running the RPO. It was when we started the drop back stuff that we saw issues. And then it was mostly the speed of the game.

I'd roll with Hank.

Your words have meaning, pale face.
friendly
0
funny
1
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted funny:
CCTAU,
No reactions
No reactions
My doctor told me I needed to stop masturbating.  I asked him why, and he said, "because I'm trying to examine you."

GH2001

  • *
  • 23914
  • I'm a Miller guy. Always been. Since I was like, 8
Re: Snag Stats
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2024, 02:55:58 PM »
In Hugh's defense, the guy did say this offense is not that hard.
So Hugh figured a number QBs have gotten it. PT should be fine...

As for Hank, we knew the increase in SEC speed would get him some. We just didn't figure on the lucky bounce, the fumble, and the INT that wasn't, yet was.

I'd roll with Hank and have him speed up his game. I wish he would have stuck with him against Arky and let him finish the game at SEC speed. I think it would have done wonders for him in the future.

We keep talking about an RPO QB. Just what is that? An option QB? I guy who can hand it off or throw it? A guy who runs it what % of time?

I see Hank as a guy who gets it. He can make the RPO reads. We did fine when running the RPO. It was when we started the drop back stuff that we saw issues. And then it was mostly the speed of the game.

I'd roll with Hank.

Yep...reps reps reps....let him take his lumps. Not sure the win total is much different between the two but one will be here another 2-3 years and one is done.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
WDE

jmar

  • ****
  • 10673
Re: Snag Stats
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2024, 05:41:06 PM »
I'm with you guys on Hank.
He had a rough start.
He's watched the film.
He now knows he can't make every ball fit in this league and he can't be faulted for a tipped ball that should have been caught.
We all have the same reaction when a QB throws one directly into a defenders arms... wtf!
Yeah he did that too.


friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions