Anyone watch the latest true-crime doc series on Netflix?
While not a crim lawyer, I have some questions (they are spoiler-y) and would like to hear some thoughts on the following:
1) Why was the defense's treatment of the "blow poker", once discovered by Clayton, not considered tampering or spoliation? They should have, in my opinion, called in the cops/forensics to document the location and condition rather than moving and handling the metal rod (WITH PLIERS).
2) Why was the entire blood analysis not excluded (even before the post-conviction Deavers stuff came out) once it was established that the crime scene, while in the custody of the police, was altered? There were pics of the same wall spaces that were demonstrably different (cleaned/wiped) in their blood spatters.