Rodriguez was let go at Arizona and the headlines read (And the talking heads say) it was because of sexual harassment. Curious (And Bi) about what he had done, I pulled up an ESPN article on it. The piece said let go because of sexual harassment, but the content says otherwise. It says a former employee retained an attorney and made the claim of S.A. against him. From that point forward, she refused to cooperate or offer one shred of anything to substantiate her claim.
The University ran a 10 week investigation and admitted to finding nothing on the claim. They also verified the former employee offered nothing. Rod voluntarily took a lie detector test and admitted to having an affair but denied any harassment. He passed the test. She then files a notice of claim that she intends to file a $7.5 million lawsuit for a hostile working environment. Then, RR is let go.
I don't know and really don't care if there was just cause to let the man go. It just appears to me that all this woman had to do was make a totally unsubstantiated claim of sexual harassment and Pandora's box is opened and the guy loses his job. He may have done some shit worthy of being let go. But all the media wants to use are the buzz words of the day, sexual harassment.
Guess it doesn't have the same ring to it as Sexual Chocolate.