No collusion happened with Trump's team & Russia...

The House Republicans admit that...
They didn't finish the investigation.
They didn't look for evidence of collusion.
They didn't interview the key players.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #147 on:** April 28, 2018, 12:23:09 AM »

Quote from: The Prowler on April 27, 2018, 08:05:59 PM

The House Republicans admit that...
They didn't finish the investigation.
They didn't look for evidence of collusion.
They didn't interview the key players.

And Muley has had one and a half years to do all of the above, and he's come up with NOTHING! And still, at the end of the day, collusion is NOT a crime.

WiregrassTiger · « **Reply #148 on:** May 01, 2018, 12:51:29 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on April 28, 2018, 12:23:09 AM

And Muley has had one and a half years to do all of the above, and he's come up with NOTHING! And still, at the end of the day, collusion is NOT a crime.

Say what you will about Snags but when it comes to legal matters, I recommend that you listen.
I donâ€™t like to discuss it but some of you may remember when I was charged with sodomy a few years back. Snags got the charges reduced to tailgating.
I honestly felt that he cared.
Primarily about getting paid. But, still. He called several times before he got his check.

CCTAU · « **Reply #149 on:** May 01, 2018, 01:30:51 PM »

Quote from: WiregrassTiger on May 01, 2018, 12:51:29 PM

Say what you will about Snags but when it comes to legal matters, I recommend that you listen.
I donâ€™t like to discuss it but some of you may remember when I was charged with sodomy a few years back. Snags got the charges reduced to tailgating.
I honestly felt that he cared.
Primarily about getting paid. But, still. He called several times before he got his check.

That wasn't him. That was his in-house collection agency!

The Prowler · « **Reply #150 on:** May 01, 2018, 06:51:45 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on April 28, 2018, 12:23:09 AM

And Muley has had one and a half years to do all of the above, and he's come up with NOTHING! And still, at the end of the day, collusion is NOT a crime.

Come up with nothing? You realize that the investigation is ongoing, but up to this point, 75 charges have been filed against 19 people, 4 are cooperating with Mueller and 5 have pleaded guilty...19 more people charged than in the nearly 3 year Benghazi investigation.

CCTAU · « **Reply #151 on:** May 01, 2018, 07:11:11 PM »

Which of those have been charged with collusion?

And sadly the evidence in Benghazi was so much greater, yet your evil kind ignored it.

WiregrassTiger · « **Reply #152 on:** May 02, 2018, 02:47:25 PM »

Quote from: CCTAU on May 01, 2018, 07:11:11 PM

Which of those have been charged with collusion?

And sadly the evidence in Benghazi was so much greater, yet your evil kind ignored it.

You like bengay you say?
How long you been that way?
Deeeez nuts!

War Eagle!!! · « **Reply #153 on:** May 04, 2018, 02:57:03 PM »

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/paul-manafort-hearing/index.html?sr=twCNN050418paul-manafort-hearing1131AMStory

Quote

A federal judge expressed deep skepticism Friday in the bank fraud case brought by special counsel Robert Mueller's office against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, at one point saying he believes that Mueller's motivation is to oust President Donald Trump from office.

"You don't really care about Mr. Manafort's bank fraud," District Judge T.S. Ellis said to prosecutor Michael Dreeben, at times losing his temper. Ellis said prosecutors were interested in Manafort because of his potential to provide material that would lead to Trump's "prosecution or impeachment," Ellis said.

chinook · « **Reply #154 on:** May 04, 2018, 03:21:12 PM »

Quote from: War Eagle!!! on May 04, 2018, 02:57:03 PM

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/paul-manafort-hearing/index.html?sr=twCNN050418paul-manafort-hearing1131AMStory

shocking...CNN reported this. shocked i am.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #155 on:** May 04, 2018, 04:02:52 PM »

CNN still toned the report down as much as they could. This Judge administered a beat down.

Vladimir · « **Reply #156 on:** May 04, 2018, 10:09:50 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on May 04, 2018, 04:02:52 PM

CNN still toned the report down as much as they could. This Judge administered a beat down.

I heard you know how to beat it.

wesfau2 · « **Reply #157 on:** May 05, 2018, 12:35:26 PM »

Quote from: War Eagle!!! on May 04, 2018, 02:57:03 PM

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/04/politics/paul-manafort-hearing/index.html?sr=twCNN050418paul-manafort-hearing1131AMStory

Even if you assume that's true, so what? If the crime was committed, then it's prosecutable.

Kaos · « **Reply #158 on:** May 05, 2018, 01:52:13 PM »

Quote from: wesfau2 on May 05, 2018, 12:35:26 PM

Even if you assume that's true, so what? If the crime was committed, then it's prosecutable.

How are you missing this?

No crime. None. They are going to keep trying until they can find something they can possibly classify as a crime, but be honest wes. Is that how "investigations" are supposed to work?

It's not supposed to be "we don't like this guy, so let's look into every facet of his life and hope we can find something to nail him, no matter how minor. Oh, and along the way, we'll leak little tidbits of salacious information that really isn't true or relevant just in case we can't find anything at all to use."

Would you want to be investigated that way? Would you want some task force led by CCTAU, me and BF to dig through everything you've ever said or done, having already pre-determiend that you must have done something and we need to bring you down?

wesfau2 · « **Reply #159 on:** May 05, 2018, 04:03:24 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on May 05, 2018, 01:52:13 PM

How are you missing this?

No crime. None.

Not sure you can say that. He's been charged, but not adjudged.