Bullshit.
He is intentionally misrepresenting my words, pretending I didn't say things I explicitly said to twist the argument.
And how is having a broken monitor insulting, exactly, snowflake?
Not bullshit, Chizad.
He responded with what he understood as your position. You responded by being an ass and making smart ass comments about him being unable to read what you had written. Have you ever considered the fact that what you actually intend may not be nearly as clear in writing as it is when you thought it in your head?
I'm trying to be the shepherd, Ringo. Your trigger is hairy, though.
I made a joke -- a joke, son, get it? -- in one thread because you used the Washington Post. You were so ready to suffuse yourself with indignant rage it flew right over your head.
I'm saying dial it back. You refuse to accept the idea of profiling even as it pertains to this shooting incident. Yet you profile CCT. You profile moi. You assume our what positions will be and respond based on that profiled assumption regardless of what the actual response may be.
If we're truly trying to clean up the bombast in this part of the forum, you can't take your snarky little shots at people and then claim to have no blood on your hands when the discourse goes awry.