Sessions?

[Kaos]

Your deflection of anything negative toward Trump is exactly how bama fans react when anything negative pops up about their Lord Saban.

Yes there is something to talk about. Like I said a while back, this is very serious, regarding a foreign government tampering with our Presidential election.

You know who tampered with the electoral process?  The Democratic Party. 

You know who didn't?  Russians. 

[AUChizad]

I think I love you so what am I so afraid of
I'm afraid that I'm not sure of a love there is no cure for
I think I love you isn't that what life is made of
Though it worries me to say that I never felt this way

I still have 420 reasons not to like Sessions, but Russia ain't one.

[The Prowler]

You know who tampered with the electoral process?  The Democratic Party. 

You know who didn't?  Russians.

Nevermind the 17 Agencies that said otherwise.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

Another whiff by you. I'm sure you'll eventually hit the ball, but you continue to aimlessly swing away.

[Kaos]

Nevermind the 17 Agencies that said otherwise.

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

Another whiff by you. I'm sure you'll eventually hit the ball, but you continue to aimlessly swing away.

You don't know what the word "tampered" means. 

[The Prowler]

You don't know what the word "tampered" means.

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."



What's shocking to me is that you and many other Republicans are okay with it. I'm not okay with Russia tampering in our election process, nor am I okay with all the trash from the DNC side.

[AUTailgatingRules]

That's the problem for him.  He could have distanced himself and said, "I wasn't a part of the campaign and I don't know if anyone in that campaign had any contact with the Russians."

But he didn't.  He acknowledged (unprompted) that he has been seen as a surrogate for the Trump campaign.  Then he said that he had no "communications with the Russians."

He had the opportunity to clarify.  He did not.  He must answer the questions now.

A lay witness could be forgiven for an incomplete answer.  The would-be top lawyer for the US has to know that omitting any valid bases for meeting/communicating with the Russians is not a complete answer.

In his position as a Senator, he had an ON THE RECORD meeting with the Russian Ambassador.  If he was doing anything nefarious, do you really think he would do it in an ON THE RECORD meeting in his senate office?

[bottomfeeder]

His meetings were held as a senator and not a campaign supporter. Nothing to see here, move along.

[The Prowler]

“I have no doubt that perjury qualifies under the Constitution as a high crime, it goes to the heart of the judicial system.” - Jeff Sessions '98

Hmmm, wonder if he still feels he same way. I'm guessing no.

[The Prowler]

In his position as a Senator, he had an ON THE RECORD meeting with the Russian Ambassador.  If he was doing anything nefarious, do you really think he would do it in an ON THE RECORD meeting in his senate office?

Great...now we wait for Danny Sheridan to release the tapes that were ON THE RECORD.

[Kaos]

“I have no doubt that perjury qualifies under the Constitution as a high crime, it goes to the heart of the judicial system.” - Jeff Sessions '98

Hmmm, wonder if he still feels he same way. I'm guessing no.

You don't know the meaning of the word tampered. You also don't know the meaning of the word perjury. You don't know the meaning of many words.

[The Prowler]

You don't know the meaning of the word tampered. You also don't know the meaning of the word perjury. You don't know the meaning of many words.

Still whiffing away I see.

Russia did tamper with the elections. Sessions could be charged with perjury.

That's the thing I love about the truth. No matter if you believe it or not, it doesn't give a shit, it's still true.

[Kaos]

Still whiffing away I see.

Russia did tamper with the elections. Sessions could be charged with perjury.

That's the thing I love about the truth. No matter if you believe it or not, it doesn't give a shit, it's still true.

Here's a word you know.  Or should. 

Shitposting

[AUChizad]

Great...now we wait for Danny Sheridan to release the tapes that were ON THE RECORD.

So…you're saying…it didn't happen…or…?

[The Prowler]

Here's a word you know.  Or should. 

Shitposting

Still whiffing and adding zero to the discussion.

[CCTAU]

Still whiffing and adding zero to the discussion.

Most of us felt #shitposting pretty much especially summed it up.


Train's still gaining speed. Apply for those gubmint benefits while you still can!

[War Eagle!!!]

Most of us felt #shitposting pretty much especially summed it up.


Train's still gaining speed. Apply for those gubmint benefits while you still can!

You do realize you guys are just alike right?

[wesfau2]

In his position as a Senator, he had an ON THE RECORD meeting with the Russian Ambassador.  If he was doing anything nefarious, do you really think he would do it in an ON THE RECORD meeting in his senate office?

Well, those ON THE RECORD meetings have transcripts, notes and a general record of the proceedings.  Let's go to the tape and see.  Unless, for some reason, Jeff didn't keep a record.

[Kaos]

Well, those ON THE RECORD meetings have transcripts, notes and a general record of the proceedings.  Let's go to the tape and see.  Unless, for some reason, Jeff didn't keep a record.

Why?  Because democrats are baying at the moon and don't understand that they lost we should do this? 

[wesfau2]

Why?  Because democrats are baying at the moon and don't understand that they lost we should do this?

Because the answer under oath was a lie.  Inadvertent?  Maybe.  Harmless?  Perhaps.  But the Attorney General needs to be as forthcoming as possible in clearing up the misunderstanding.  Unrelated to the Trump administration, Sessions has a duty to be trustworthy and honest.  He's possibly breached that duty and the truth is imperative.

[Kaos]

Because the answer under oath was a lie. 
Wrong

Inadvertent?  Maybe.  Harmless?  Perhaps.  But the Attorney General needs to be as forthcoming as possible in clearing up the misunderstanding.  Unrelated to the Trump administration, Sessions has a duty to be trustworthy and honest.  He's possibly breached that duty and the truth is imperative.
Wrong

#witchhunt