The media bias against President Trump is blatant and overt (CNN, Rachel Madcow bawling, Seth Meyer, SNL). But it's also subtle, planting ideas in people's heads with inferences slipped into articles that, on their face, aren't seen as ragingly anti-Trump.
Take this paragraph inserted into a fairly innocuous article about his Florida speech (which was wrongly classified as a 'campaign rally').
Trump has lurched from crisis to crisis since the inauguration, including the botched rollout of his immigration order, struggles confirming his Cabinet picks and a near-constant stream of reports about strife within his administration.
Let's take this one bogus assertion at a time.
1) President Trump hasn't "lurched" anywhere. That word alone makes it look as if he's shambled through the White House, slamming into walls and stumbling. Simply not true.
2) The rollout of his immigration order was not "botched" by his hand. It was sabotaged by liberal, wrong-headed activist judges and assailed by a misinformed bunch of nancy pants fucks who protested without a)understanding what they were actually protesting or b) having any clear idea of what outcome they wanted to achieve through their protests. That's hardly "botched." In fact, it was rolled out perfectly and had the agitating judges done their jobs we'd all be safer today.
3) Struggles confirming his Cabinet selections. And that's his fault? No, it's the democrats with their underwear on their head and their lances pointed at windmills who are causing this problem. Not Trump.
4) "Near constant stream of reports about strife." Reports from a left-driven media on a mission to delegitimize and take down an elected president with which they do not agree and cannot stomach. From Rachel Madcow's "we are in hell", to Seth Meyers snide rants, to the lies spewing from the Times and Globe, to CNN ridiculing his every move? The "stream of reports" is vastly overinflated and very likely mostly fabricated.
But this is how the left wants you to see this President, a man who is action not talk (the opposite of their beloved Obama), a man who is deeply patriotic and America-first (the antithesis of their beloved Obama), a man who is results-driven (again in direct contrast to 'its all about feelings' Obama), a man who is blunt and direct (once more the opposite of their beloved jive-speak Obama) and a man who is doing what he believes he was elected to do (again not what their beloved 'I'm really Islamic' Obama did).
This is the problem. It's a major problem. We've got people in the intelligence community substituting their own political biases for their duty as agents -- because of their loyalty to Obama and their belief in the media.
I don't want Trump to be a dictator, but he's in a position to where he really needs to clean house. Anybody who is leaking information to the press or anybody else needs to be fired and prosecuted. I fully support his combative stance with a media that's already judged and sentenced him and sees itself as the executor. I don't want him to "soften" or capitulate. We've got to drive all the remnants of Obama's divisive, racist, globalist influence out of Washington. I'd like to drive it out of America and hope that it pulled all of the Bernie Sanders socialists out in its wake.
27 Replies
5024 Views