This is America?

[WiregrassTiger]

I think a lot of the rub comes from the 9th's questions as far as intent and what appeared to be just making shit up as they went along as it suited them. Especially Freidland. They are trying to get into someone's head and decide their reasoning. That's dangerous.

Same thing re: hate crimes. That's the major problem that I have with them.

I don't think Chizzy should get even one day more in jail for calling me a nagger while he punches me in the eye.

Well, that's a bad example because he would be deceased or hospitalized if that happened. But you see where I'm going.

[GH2001]

Same thing re: hate crimes. That's the major problem that I have with them.

I don't think Chizzy should get even one day more in jail for calling me a nagger while he punches me in the eye.

Well, that's a bad example because he would be deceased or hospitalized if that happened. But you see where I'm going.

You were gonna whip his ass at X gate.

[WiregrassTiger]

You were gonna whip his ass at X gate.

Looked everywhere. No Chizzy.

[CCTAU]

Looked everywhere. No Chizzy.

You were probably looking for a guy...

[WiregrassTiger]

You were probably looking for a guy...

No.

[GH2001]

You were probably looking for a guy...

Can't miss chizad! That's a big ole dude.

[Snaggletiger]

Can't miss chizad! That's a big ole dude.

His brother is much better looking.

[Kaos]

His brother is much better looking.

And more talented? 

[Snaggletiger]

And more talented?

Well that goes without saying, doesn't it?

[GH2001]

His brother is much better looking.

Not that you are gay or anything.

[Godfather]

Not that you are gay or anything.

He isn't?

[GH2001]

He isn't?

He is?

[Snaggletiger]

Come on, guys.  It's Evan.  We'd all "experiment", right?  Right?


Guys?





Anyone?

[Godfather]

Each of the three was addressing the rights of people living here legally, each in different ways.

Remember, they're not even saying it is definitely constitutionally illegal, but that it might be.

The New York class action case on behalf of the two Iraqis who were here in the US legally working with the military:
As already mentioned, the Massachusetts case was pertaining to two permanent resident college professors because she found that "the government could not "detain or remove" individuals who had arrived legally from the countries subject to Trump's order."

And the Washington judge ruled that the ban negatively impacted people and businesses legally residing in the state of Washington.

I think you will find that in the court ruling US vs. Fishbine, a man subjected to potential incineration while wearing another man's suit is entitled to $10,000 worth of airline tickets.

It's an obscure ruling, but a very important one to me.

[WiregrassTiger]

Oh, you've remodeled the garage. It must've cost you hundreds.

[Saniflush]

You know, if you shoot me, you're liable to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards.