Sessions for AG

[wesfau2]

I don't know Jeff Sessions.  But I do believe that Trump expected him to stand up against the fake news onslaught and thought he made a pussy move by recusing himself.  Trump expected him to be a warrior, not a namby pamby run of the mill cover your ass politician and was not happy with how he handled it. 

To be truthful?  Neither was I.  I also thought it was a wuss move.

What is your understanding of the role of the DOJ vis a vis the president?

I'll hang up and listen.

[Kaos]

What is your understanding of the role of the DOJ vis a vis the president?

I'll hang up and listen.

I don't think there was a reason for him to recuse.  He pussed out.

That's all.

[The Prowler]

"...I did not have communications with the Russians." (Jan. 10th Senate hearing & Jan 17th)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-spoke-twice-with-russian-ambassador-during-trumps-presidential-campaign-justice-officials-say/2017/03/01/77205eda-feac-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.68a698362ece
 
"Let me be clear, I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign..." (Mar. 2nd press conference)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-discussed-trump-campaign-related-matters-with-russian-ambassador-us-intelligence-intercepts-show/2017/07/21/3e704692-6e44-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html?utm_term=.875df9b65caf

[Kaos]

"...I did not have communications with the Russians." (Jan. 10th Senate hearing & Jan 17th)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-spoke-twice-with-russian-ambassador-during-trumps-presidential-campaign-justice-officials-say/2017/03/01/77205eda-feac-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.68a698362ece
 
"Let me be clear, I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign..." (Mar. 2nd press conference)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-discussed-trump-campaign-related-matters-with-russian-ambassador-us-intelligence-intercepts-show/2017/07/21/3e704692-6e44-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html?utm_term=.875df9b65caf

WaPo:

Bullshit
Bullshit

[Snaggletiger]

This shit is never going to change.  I think I'll stop visiting here and focus on Auburn football, Braves baseball, the Cheating Cards, the Cheating Cubs and my large cock.

Plus, I'm getting tickets to the Atlanta United Soccer match set for September 10th at the new Merky D's stadium.  The day after we kick Clemson's ass. 

Screw this forum.  Have at it with the same new/recycled shit adding nothing to the conversation.  Ba-bye! 

[The Prowler]

This shit is never going to change.  I think I'll stop visiting here and focus on Auburn football, Braves baseball, the Cheating Cards, the Cheating Cubs and my large cock.

Plus, I'm getting tickets to the Atlanta United Soccer match set for September 10th at the new Merky D's stadium.  The day after we kick Clemson's ass. 

Screw this forum.  Have at it with the same new/recycled shit adding nothing to the conversation.  Ba-bye!

Look for Sessions to resign sometime soon...that's not going to stop their investigation into him.

[The Prowler]

WaPo:

Bullshit
Bullshit

^^head in the sand^^

[Kaos]

^^head in the sand^^

Ass served on a platter over and over and over.  The dumbassery on your part is overwhelming.

I'm also done with this forum.  I've watched several people give up on it because of the numbnuts shit you consistently spew.  Add me to the mix.  There's nothing to be gained here.

You and a few others can oil each other's dicks and keep fervently wishing some of this bullshit will eventually stick to Trump (it won't) and you can have your nonsensical democratic fairy land back like you always wanted it.  You won't get it, but you can keep on wishing in one hand and wiping shit with the other. 

Just do it without me.  I've had enough of your relentless idiocy.

[The Prowler]

Ass served on a platter over and over and over.  The dumbassery on your part is overwhelming.

I'm also done with this forum.  I've watched several people give up on it because of the numbnuts shit you consistently spew.  Add me to the mix.  There's nothing to be gained here.

You and a few others can oil each other's dicks and keep fervently wishing some of this bullshit will eventually stick to Trump (it won't) and you can have your nonsensical democratic fairy land back like you always wanted it.  You won't get it, but you can keep on wishing in one hand and wiping shit with the other. 

Just do it without me.  I've had enough of your relentless idiocy.

So, in your opinion...posting links to the New York Times or Washington Post about the ongoing investigation into Trump and associates is "relentless idiocy".

I tell you what, I'll stop posting links to articles regarding Trump and Co. and their collusion with Russia when the investigation is over. Because, whether you know it or not, this is historic and the outcome is something everyone, in America and around the World, should be interested in.

[CCTAU]

So, in your opinion...posting links to the New York Times or Washington Post about the ongoing investigation into Trump and associates is "relentless idiocy".

I tell you what, I'll stop posting links to articles regarding Trump and Co. and their collusion with Russia when the investigation is over. Because, whether you know it or not, this is historic and the outcome is something everyone, in America and around the World, should be interested in.

The outcome will be just like Comeyy's testimony. Another fart in the wind.
Won't matter though. Your vagina will still be sandy and your feeling will still be hurt.
It's become very apparent that you are incapable of rational thought when it comes to Trump. He has had you by the Pu*** since day one!

[RWS]

"...I did not have communications with the Russians." (Jan. 10th Senate hearing & Jan 17th)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-spoke-twice-with-russian-ambassador-during-trumps-presidential-campaign-justice-officials-say/2017/03/01/77205eda-feac-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.68a698362ece
 
"Let me be clear, I never had meetings with Russian operatives or Russian intermediaries about the Trump campaign..." (Mar. 2nd press conference)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-discussed-trump-campaign-related-matters-with-russian-ambassador-us-intelligence-intercepts-show/2017/07/21/3e704692-6e44-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html?utm_term=.875df9b65caf

He explained this in his testimony in front of the committee.  Of course he met with all kinds of people from other countries, including Russia; that was his job as a Senator as a part of certain committees.  In January, he assumed the question was asked in the context of did you have communications for the purpose of colluding.  I was watching it live, and I assumed that's what they meant too.  Because that's what the hearing was about.  And this is also part of the problem where you go clickbait on everyone.  You don't actually watch this stuff. You simply gobble up whatever left leaning media outlets put out and go with it.  Maybe you should actually watch some of these hearings and think for yourself.

Just a question, and try not to ghost on this thread like you usually do when someone asks you to have an opinion for yourself:  Why do you think it is OK to have this witch hunt against Trump while allowing Hillary to skate when her campaign was meeting with the Ukrainian government to get dirt on Trump.  Why do you think it is OK that Hillary's campaign rigged the Democratic primaries to ensure she would get the nomination?  Why do you think that it is OK that nobody is checking to make sure her campaign wasn't colluding with foreign powers (especially since we know she was trying to get dirt from the Ukrainians)?

[The Prowler]

He explained this in his testimony in front of the committee.  Of course he met with all kinds of people from other countries, including Russia; that was his job as a Senator as a part of certain committees.  In January, he assumed the question was asked in the context of did you have communications for the purpose of colluding.  I was watching it live, and I assumed that's what they meant too.  Because that's what the hearing was about.  And this is also part of the problem where you go clickbait on everyone.  You don't actually watch this stuff. You simply gobble up whatever left leaning media outlets put out and go with it.  Maybe you should actually watch some of these hearings and think for yourself.

Just a question, and try not to ghost on this thread like you usually do when someone asks you to have an opinion for yourself:  Why do you think it is OK to have this witch hunt against Trump while allowing Hillary to skate when her campaign was meeting with the Ukrainian government to get dirt on Trump.  Why do you think it is OK that Hillary's campaign rigged the Democratic primaries to ensure she would get the nomination?  Why do you think that it is OK that nobody is checking to make sure her campaign wasn't colluding with foreign powers (especially since we know she was trying to get dirt from the Ukrainians)?

Why do you think that I think it's okay? I've never said that at all, ever. Hillary isn't the President. Why do you continue to dodge everything with "Hillary this, Obama that".
As for the question about Sessions. You apparently didn't hear the confirmation hearing or you're just a moron.

Sen. Franken: ...if (the allegation) is true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions: Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

The question was, what will you do as AG if these allegations are true. Sessions offered up the "I didn't, did not, have communications with the Russians." (Note: Sessions did and he did have them about Trump campaign related matters like I posted previously).

[War Eagle!!!]

Sen. Franken: affiliated with the Trump campaign

Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions: Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

I am pretty damn sure that Sessions has explained this already. He was answering the question that he DID NOT meet with or have communications with a Russian official pertaining to the Trump campaign.

I swear. I don't think people realize that keeping on beating this same drum only empowers Trump, both in his own head and the people that elected him. It's this talk, as of now since there is ZERO evidence of anything, that is giving Trump more power. The more people talk this crap about Russia, the more no proof comes out on him, the more Trump thinks he can say whatever he wants to, and the more his followers get embolden. It's a viscous cycle. And both sides need to stop.

[wesfau2]

I am pretty damn sure that Sessions has explained this already. He was answering the question that he DID NOT meet with or have communications with a Russian official pertaining to the Trump campaign.

Except now it's known that he did speak with a Russian ambassador about the Trump campaign.

[Kaos]

Except now it's known that he did speak with a Russian ambassador about the Trump campaign.

"Known"? 

You're taking the word of a foreign agent bragging on a bugged phone over the sworn testimony of a former US Senator and current attorney general. 

You, sir, are what's wrong with America. 

[AUChizad]

"Known"? 

You're taking the word of a foreign agent bragging on a bugged phone over the sworn testimony of a former US Senator and current attorney general. 

You, sir, are what's wrong with America.

Did you take the word of some 22 year old dick-sucking floozie over the President of the United States' sworn testimony back in 1995?

[Kaos]

Did you take the word of some 22 year old dick-sucking floozie over the President of the United States' sworn testimony back in 1995?

Irrelevant. And DNA. 

[RWS]

Why do you think that I think it's okay? I've never said that at all, ever. Hillary isn't the President. Why do you continue to dodge everything with "Hillary this, Obama that".
As for the question about Sessions. You apparently didn't hear the confirmation hearing or you're just a moron.

I haven't dodged anything.  I didn't answer with a question.  I answered, and separately asked a question.  My point is, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.  If we're THAT concerned about foreign meddling in our elections, then we need to look at the entire picture; not just cherry pick.  I haven't seen you jumping up and down about anything shady that Clinton did during the election, so that's why I think that you think it's OK.  And if your answer to that is "because Hillary didn't win", you're saying that it's OK to do all kinds of shady things, and it's OK for foreign interests to influence the election as long as the person that it helps doesn't win.  Foreign meddling in our elections is either wrong or it isn't.  It shouldn't depend on if your person won or not.  And in that same sense, the US should probably stop meddling in other foreign elections as well. 

Sen. Franken: ...if (the allegation) is true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Then-Sen. Jeff Sessions: Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it.

The question was, what will you do as AG if these allegations are true. Sessions offered up the "I didn't, did not, have communications with the Russians." (Note: Sessions did and he did have them about Trump campaign related matters like I posted previously).

I'm not sure that you understand the definition of context, and I'm not sure that you read my post.

[WiregrassTiger]

Irrelevant. And DNA.

Chizzy left DNA?

[AUChizad]

Irrelevant. And DNA.

So politicians are capable of lying? Even under sworn testimony?