We know better than the voters...

[War Eagle!!!]

Not what I'm saying.

So do you think she deserves to be the Democratic nominee?

[wesfau2]

So do you think she deserves to be the Democratic nominee?

"Deserves" is pretty loaded.

I'd prefer Bernie.  But if he hasn't played the game (despite his well-documented years to learn it), then it ain't him.

Ultimately, I'd prefer a system with true choices beyond R and D.

In the game we have, it is what it is.

[Kaos]

I'd prefer Bernie. 

Any argument you make from this point on is rendered invalid. 

[wesfau2]

Any argument you make from this point on is rendered invalid.

Over Hillary and Trump, absolutely.

Trump is such a blustering, substance blackhole that I have to disregard him.  Since my vote counts in FL, I must vote mainstream party (when the situation is as dire as it is currently).

You in the foregone states actually have the luxury of voting 3rd party and building their numbers towards viability.

I do not.

[Kaos]

Over Hillary and Trump, absolutely.

Maybe you want to pay 3x as much in taxes while Prowler gets free Cheetos.  I do not. 

[wesfau2]

Maybe you want to pay 3x as much in taxes while Prowler gets free Cheetos.  I do not.

Trump won't enact his asinine plans.

Bernie won't enact his extreme plans.

Hillary has the best shot, and she is relatively in line with my beliefs, but she won't enact any sweeping policy changes.

The checks and balances are there for a reason.

[Kaos]

Hillary has the best shot, and she is relatively in line with my beliefs......

Once again your subsequent arguments have been voided. 

Voted off the island.  No immunity.

[wesfau2]

Once again your subsequent arguments have been voided. 

Voted off the island.  No immunity.

O.


K.

[GH2001]

Trump won't enact his asinine plans.

Bernie won't enact his extreme plans.

Hillary has the best shot, and she is relatively in line with my beliefs, but she won't enact any sweeping policy changes.

The checks and balances are there for a reason.

You mean how they worked with Obamacare and the Scotus farce judgement?

Or his amnesty executive action?

Those kinds of checks and balances mean jack squat to people like Barry and Hillary. They do what they want and no one in congress or the senate aside from Paul or Cruz have the balls to call them on it even using a filibuster if necessary.

[CCTAU]

Over Hillary and Trump, absolutely.

Trump is such a blustering, substance blackhole that I have to disregard him.  Since my vote counts in FL, I must vote mainstream party (when the situation is as dire as it is currently).

You in the foregone states actually have the luxury of voting 3rd party and building their numbers towards viability.

I do not.

OMG. I had almost written you off. The glimmer of hope is there!

[CCTAU]

Once again your subsequent arguments have been voided. 

Voted off the island.  No immunity.

Yeah. I spoke too soon...

[Kaos]

O.


K.

That you can even consider voting for Hillary or Bernie and then chide me for my "integrity" or "credibility" is the height of irony. 

[bottomfeeder]

As voters, we do have a choice. We can choose either FASCISM or SOCIO-COMMUNO-MARXISM. The jury is still out on Trump.

[wesfau2]

That you can even consider voting for Hillary or Bernie and then chide me for my "integrity" or "credibility" is the height of irony.

You have the option of another candidate.  I do not.

Trump is the single biggest mistake this country could make. 

As voters, we do have a choice. We can choose either FASCISM or SOCIO-COMMUNO-MARXISM. The jury is still out on Trump.

Um...Trump is the fascist in this election cycle, chuckles.

[Kaos]

Trump is the single biggest mistake this country could make. 

Where's that buzzer sound?

No, bucko. The answer you are looking for here is "hillary"

Sorry.

[Snaggletiger]

May want to slow the rolls on Hillary.  The old guy beat her in Oregon yesterday and it appears she barely scraped by him in Kentucky.  She may not be as wildly popular as many think she is.  Obama crushed that ass last election and a crusty, old man is taking her down to the wire in this one.  People may really be paying attention to her baggage.

[AUChizad]

Where's that buzzer sound?

No, bucko. The answer you are looking for here is "hillary"

Sorry.

You're both wrong, but Kaos is, of course more wrong.

In order from good to bad...

Johnson would be a step in the right direction and actual change for the better.

Hillary would be business as usual and more of the same cronyism and bullshittery.

Sanders would be a turning point in history where our society and economy began to rapidly deteriorate. We end up being where Venezuela is within my lifetime, and in case you don't read the papers, they are 100 kids of fucked right now.

Trump would be a turning point in history where we become a hybrid of the governments of Idiocracy, 1984, and North Korea.

One is good, one is bad, and two are catastrophic.

[War Eagle!!!]

May want to slow the rolls on Hillary.  The old guy beat her in Oregon yesterday and it appears she barely scraped by him in Kentucky.  She may not be as wildly popular as many think she is.  Obama crushed that ass last election and a crusty, old man is taking her down to the wire in this one.  People may really be paying attention to her baggage.

Which is why I don't believe the "Hillary will thump Trump in the General" rhetoric.

The democrat primary was predetermined and Hillary still can't put the loon away.

[Snaggletiger]

Sanders would be a turning point in history where our society and economy began to rapidly deteriorate. We end up being where Venezuela is within my lifetime, and in case you don't read the papers, they are 100 kids of fucked right now.

I can take a lot of things, but I won't put up with fucking the kids.

[Ogre]

Which is why I don't believe the "Hillary will thump Trump in the General" rhetoric.

The democrat primary was predetermined and Hillary still can't put the loon away.

I have to admit, I'm starting to agree with you.  She has to be the worst politician of all time.