Of course you don't. Probably like how Trump is supah smart but doesn't have time to express it.
I was going out the door to a concert and didn't have time to answer all your silliness.
Some of the things the article pointed out I didn't care about either way. Did he end welfare? I don't think so because it still exists. Did he deregulate the banks? I guess so, but that wasn't a big deal in my mind either. Apparently whoever wrote that article thought they were big hairy deals.
He did some good things I'm sure, but I'm not sure what they were.
I thought Clinton set America on the wrong path with the NAFTA agreement which, in my opinion, hastened the collapse of small town America and with it the community values, cooperative spirit and homegrown patriotism those small towns inspired. When I was a kid we knew the people who lived in our town. My parents knew the parents of my friends. We knew where they worked because we saw them every day leaving the mill, leaving the muffler plant, eating dinner at the local cafes, shopping at the local groceries and pharmacies. We had small town events like Christmas parades, Fourth of July celebrations that were true community events. People brought food. We socialized. We were all family in a way.
Now? Because of NAFTA much of that is gone. I live in a subdivision. I know some of the people here. Not many. We don't do anything together. They occasionally try, but nobody participates. I don't know the parents of my kids friends, I don't know what they do for a living. Most people are commuters to jobs somewhere else. I blame Clinton (to a large degree) and NAFTA for destroying those job-producing economic cornerstones of small town America. In its place is a corporate sameness everywhere. Chilis, Kohls, McDonalds, Dillards and Longhorn has replaced Pat's Diner, Stine Clothing, The Burger Joint, Earl's Department Store and Miss Katy's Restaurant. That's a bad bad thing.
I don't like Clinton's push to allow anybody with a pulse to purchase a house. That was going to be his legacy -- homes for e'erbody! Until it destroyed the economy.
So there are parts of that article with which I agree. Others that either don't matter to me or aren't as important as the left wing lunatic author of the piece believes them to be.
The big takeaway, and the point with which I agree completely, is that Clinton left a trail of destruction in his wake that will take decades to overcome. Much of that was at the behest or direction of the socialist shrew whore lying mommy part slut wife of his. I don't want that dragon beast anywhere near the White House.