Because you watch too many movies and have lost your grip on reality, perhaps? It's a single lion. No this particular one shouldn't have been taken but by all accounts, the dentist himself wasn't at fault for that aspect of the situation. The landowner and guide are hired for a reason. They are paid to lead a legal and safe hunt.
Meanwhile a quarter of the actual human beings existing within the same country's borders as this single animal are dying of malaria, AIDS, and God knows what else... and we hear not a peep.
Internet vigilantism, folks.
^^This.
"I relied on the expertise of my local professional guides to ensure a legal hunt," CBS reported.
"I had no idea that the lion I took was a known, local favorite, was collared and part of a study until the end of the hunt," Palmer said, according to CBS. "I deeply regret that my pursuit of an activity I love and practice responsibly and legally resulted in the taking of this lion."
Mexican drug gangs could start raping and abducting all teenage girls they can reach in Tx, Putin can patrol the Gulf of Mexico in a nuclear sub, and disease and pestilence may go rampant across the U.S. but one thing is for sure, most of our "animal lovers" will die to protect Snookums and not be concerned re: human problems.
I like dogs but by today's standard, I doubt I'm considered an "animal lover"--If I have to put animals on the same level as humans.
I hated the dog fighting stuff and want people charged with a crime. I hate animal cruelty, where people are purposely injuring animals for entertainment. But, there are better things to concern ourselves with than to want to attack a dentist from Minnesota who thought he was legally hunting a lion.
The U.S. has an animal loving problem and we've put some animals above humans on the food chain. But it would be politically incorrect to address the issue and 3/4 of the population would object.
It's a sickness that has grown leaps and bounds over the last 30 years.