Big Game Bob does it again

[Buzz Killington]

Cowpokes win in Overtime, 38-35

[GH2001]

And how about those store bought refs in Atlanta tonight? I'm getting like THS with that bunch. Just fucking sick of it.

[Buzz Killington]

Did not watch one second of the bammer bowl

[RWS]

And how about those store bought refs in Atlanta tonight? I'm getting like THS with that bunch. Just fucking sick of it.

Ho, please.  Probably the only really questionable call was the fumble.  They called forward progress, and he was being pushed back before the ball came loose.  It was borderline though, and I wouldn't have had a problem with it going the other way.

Targeting call was dead on.  If that isn't targeting as defined by the rule, I don't know what is.
https://vine.co/v/OrZjT3nTnAZ

Sorry, I'm too much of a fucktard to figure out how to get it to embed.

[Townhallsavoy]

And how about those store bought refs in Atlanta tonight? I'm getting like THS with that bunch. Just fucking sick of it.

Unfortunately, I did catch a few minutes of it when I went to BurgerFi to get a burger.  That restaurant sucks by the way.  $4 for a plain kids hot dog.

Anyway, I saw Derrick Henry run for a touchdown to go up 35-13.  Thanks to a seminar paper that's due tomorrow at 5pm, I've been busy all day.  I'm much, much happier for it.  Just seeing him run down the field and score and hearing Verne and Gary's typical sploogefest over Alabama started boiling my blood. 

Seems like yesterday I was annoyed Alabama fans bragging about their bullshit "Got 12?" claims.  Now they're about to get 16.  Come get me when the NCAA grows some balls. 

[jmar]

Ho, please.  Probably the only really questionable call was the fumble.  They called forward progress, and he was being pushed back before the ball came loose.  It was borderline though, and I wouldn't have had a problem with it going the other way.

Targeting call was dead on.  If that isn't targeting as defined by the rule, I don't know what is.
https://vine.co/v/OrZjT3nTnAZ

Sorry, I'm too much of a fucktard to figure out how to get it to embed.

Bammer friend of mine says he felt sorry for the guy that got tossed. Hands made contact first, then an inadvertant blow under the chin of Sims who went down. I haven't seen the replays though.

[RWS]

Bammer friend of mine says he felt sorry for the guy that got tossed. Hands made contact first, then an inadvertant blow under the chin of Sims who went down. I haven't seen the replays though.

https://vine.co/#/v/OrZjT3nTnAZ

Again, I'm too retarded to get it to embed.

[War Eagle!!!]

https://vine.co/#/v/OrZjT3nTnAZ

Again, I'm too retarded to get it to embed.

It's fucking amazing how much more you post when Alabama may actually win something...

[jmar]

Whisky getting murdered 31-0.

[Buzz Killington]

Forced Sex just took their first lead of the night.

[RWS]

It's fucking amazing how much more you post when Alabama may actually win something...

If you look back, I usually only post when it's Alabama related lately.  I'm not even gloating.  Simply saying the refs didn't just hand Bama the game as was suggested.

[RWS]

Whisky getting murdered 31-0.

And tOSU is playing their third string QB. 

[GH2001]

Ho, please.  Probably the only really questionable call was the fumble.  They called forward progress, and he was being pushed back before the ball came loose.  It was borderline though, and I wouldn't have had a problem with it going the other way.

Targeting call was dead on.  If that isn't targeting as defined by the rule, I don't know what is.
https://vine.co/v/OrZjT3nTnAZ

Sorry, I'm too much of a fucktard to figure out how to get it to embed.

Funny. Your db laid a lick much worse this year. Last I checked hands pushing off isn't targeting.

[RWS]

Funny. Your db laid a lick much worse this year. Last I checked hands pushing off isn't targeting.

Yeah, and he got ejected for it too.

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the
Helmet

ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an
opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.
(Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I)

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of
a Defenseless Player

ARTICLE 4. No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or
neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow
or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-
4-I-VI)

[jmar]

The game was meant to be entertainingly violent.

[Kaos]

 I'm retarded

Agreeance

[GH2001]

Agreeance

I second that.

He never lead or targeted him with the helmet you dumbass. He never lowered it. He pushed with his fucking hands.

I guess you are gonna defend the 2 non reviews as well? Let me guess - his feet were inbounds and the caveman had forward progress eh? Although if anyone else does that it's ruled a fumble - like ga tech last week.

[Townhallsavoy]

[RWS]

I don't disagree with your point.  Murray said that the defender's helmet didn't touch his, but I'm pretty sure that it did.  It wouldn't have been roughing the passer since a defender was already returning the intercepted ball, but would have been targeting I think. 

[GH2001]

And wasn't called. Same way their holds aren't called. Same way their fumbles are miraculously "forward progress" even though effort is still there and no whistle has blown. Same way they magically get no questionable play reviewed. Every benefit of every doubt. If someone doesn't see this they are blind.