Errors in inquiry on rape allegations against Jamies Winston

I'm torn, because it is a he said / she said situation. However, if she said no once, then it is rape. I don't have daughters but I know those of you that do, would take this entire story different if it were your own child.

Also hard to dispute a 911 call the night of.

Godfather · « **Reply #14 on:** April 16, 2014, 03:08:12 PM »

Quote

Afterward, the woman told investigators, the man put her on a bed, dressed her and drove her on a scooter to an intersection near her dormitory and dropped her off.

Fuck....God damn Cam was in on it.

WiregrassTiger · « **Reply #15 on:** April 16, 2014, 03:15:47 PM »

The biggest problem most of you have is that the dick is black. If Jameis had a tiny little white dick instead of a big black one, how would you feel?

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #16 on:** April 16, 2014, 03:19:27 PM »

Quote from: Townhallsavoy on April 16, 2014, 03:04:22 PM

Not a fan of Jameis Winston, but that article reeks of similarities to the Cam Newton witch hunt.

Maybe a little but these are some serious allegations and if half of this is true, heads are going to roll and millions will be paid. The issue with Newton was simply whether or not he took illegal benefits and would be eligible to play football or not. This is a rape/assault charge where the police clearly either completely botched the investigation or intentionally ignored damning evidence. If the latter is true, it was definitely to protect the big man on campus. You have a woman claiming she was raped and possibly drugged and there's video of the meeting (30 cameras in the bar) and video of the actual californication (Team mate videod part of it) and the police got none of it and looks like they didn't even try to get it.

Godfather · « **Reply #17 on:** April 16, 2014, 03:29:31 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on April 16, 2014, 03:19:27 PM

Maybe a little but these are some serious allegations and if half of this is true, heads are going to roll and millions will be paid. The issue with Newton was simply whether or not he took illegal benefits and would be eligible to play football or not. This is a rape/assault charge where the police clearly either completely botched the investigation or intentionally ignored damning evidence. If the latter is true, it was definitely to protect the big man on campus. You have a woman claiming she was raped and possibly drugged and there's video of the meeting (30 cameras in the bar) and video of the actual californication (Team mate videod part of it) and the police got none of it and looks like they didn't even try to get it.

This.

He has a daughter and cares.

Townhallsavoy · « **Reply #18 on:** April 16, 2014, 04:33:54 PM »

Quote from: Snaggletiger on April 16, 2014, 03:19:27 PM

Maybe a little but these are some serious allegations and if half of this is true, heads are going to roll and millions will be paid. The issue with Newton was simply whether or not he took illegal benefits and would be eligible to play football or not. This is a rape/assault charge where the police clearly either completely botched the investigation or intentionally ignored damning evidence. If the latter is true, it was definitely to protect the big man on campus. You have a woman claiming she was raped and possibly drugged and there's video of the meeting (30 cameras in the bar) and video of the actual californication (Team mate videod part of it) and the police got none of it and looks like they didn't even try to get it.

IF THE LATTER IS TRUE.

That's the problem. Sure, it's worse allegations. But all we really know is that the prosecution claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to even bring it to trial.

Until something comes out that says - "Investigation reopen" or "here are new concrete details not presented before" - then we're just looking for a reason to believe that Jameis is guilty. Just like the rest of the country when it came to Cam Newton.

The Prowler · « **Reply #19 on:** April 16, 2014, 04:48:42 PM »

Quote from: Townhallsavoy on April 16, 2014, 04:33:54 PM

IF THE LATTER IS TRUE.

That's the problem. Sure, it's worse allegations. But all we really know is that the prosecution claimed that there wasn't enough evidence to even bring it to trial.

Until something comes out that says - "Investigation reopen" or "here are new concrete details not presented before" - then we're just looking for a reason to believe that Jameis is guilty. Just like the rest of the country when it came to Cam Newton.

The only difference will be, the rest of the Country won't have the REC cramming it down their throats on a daily basis through every platform known to man.