At least McBadtattoo is far enough down that if Winston gets convicted of raping a bus load of baby nuns he won't make up enough ground on the other two to win.
He would be a less deserving winner than Ingram. I can't see how the bammers are justifying him being in the running for it. All they can say is look at his career, well, it's not a fucking lifetime achievement award.
I haven't listened to much sports talk radio this week, but last week the talking heads were all such dipshits about McTatt:"Well, first off this isn't a lifetime achievement award...but when you look at McTatt's body of work...the championships. He deserves it."What?
@ESPNStatsInfoHeisman candidate? Nick Marshall's adjusted Total QBR since Oct. 1 is 87.0, 3rd in FBS (Winston, Mariota) http://es.pn/175I72v
I could see Tre in the Heisman discussion next year should he return and our O-line coming back.
I could see both Tre & Nick entering, honestly.
Using that logic, the 09 Heisman should have been Colt McCoy (which was the right call then)
Ingram won it for carrying Alabama over SC with 200 or so and then having a decent game in the SEC- G Tre's body of work is exponentially greater than the puffy ewok's. it's not even close. Voters are idiots
Umm, I'm sorry, but saving the universe is a big deal. Hollywood likes to portray Skywalker as the hero, but those fuzzy little fuckers played a part in the Death Star's demise.
I'd vote for Tre Mason...all he has done is continue to churn out yardage against "Top Rushing Defenses in The Country"
1,621 yards and 22 TD's. Bad azz. I did see this quote in an al.crumbs article on Mason getting Heisman recognition. Answering the question of whether Tre should get an invite. So, since he's one of, if not the best back in the country....but hasn't been pimped...."It's borderline because it's so late in the process," said Chris Huston of HeismanPundit.com. "So much of it is about name recognition."