You Racist Bastages

[Saniflush]

ET was not black...he was full blooded Cherokee Indian.

Damn, I bet he has laid into some of that tax free cigarette and casino money.

[Snaggletiger]

So, should they take down the General Lee portrait or not?

[WiregrassTiger]

So, should they take down the General Lee portrait or not?

Stay on topic please.

[AUChizad]

So, should they take down the General Lee portrait or not?

[Godfather]

 

[GH2001]

Finally someone in this thread who comes with facts from somewhere other than the National Enquirer. This post has soul my man.

So now a documented speech on economic opinion is National Inquirer material?

“One day we must ask the question, ‘Why are there forty million poor people in America?’ And when you begin to ask that question, you’re raising a question about the economic system, about a broader distribution of wealth. When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy.”

— Dr. Martin Luther King, “Where do We Go from Here?” SCLC Presidential Address, Aug 16, 1967.

[AU_Tiger_2000]

Yes. That's exactly the same thing.

If you can't win the argument with facts, do it with patronizing I guess.

Those three guys were innovators and thinkers. Compared to them MLK did jack shoot.

Anyone care to defend his sex parties and the irony of his title?

Biggest problem is some people don't recognize a joke.

[Kaos]

[GH2001]

Biggest problem is some people don't recognize a joke.

Most don't when it's bad.

It was more a response to wiregrass' smartassed comments that started the whole pow wow (racist I know) which were idiotic. I've still yet to see him support his side with anything other than his own garbage rhetoric and Chizads Wikipedia and snopes articles. If facts fly in the face of the picture perfect angelic image of MLK he was spoon fed, then that's his issue.

[dallaswareagle]

He holds his beer like a girl. 

[WiregrassTiger]

Most don't when it's bad.

It was more a response to wiregrass' smartassed comments that started the whole pow wow (racist I know) which were idiotic. I've still yet to see him support his side with anything other than his own garbage rhetoric and Chizads Wikipedia and snopes articles. If facts fly in the face of the picture perfect angelic image of MLK he was spoon fed, then that's his issue.

I just don't understand why there can't be an exchange of ideas and political beliefs without a barrage of insults.

I get it that some people don't understand or can't see the positives that MLK or even Obama may have contributed--because they refuse to see the trees in the forest. That's understandable because some of us can't look beyond our pre-conceived notions about a particular race, culture, etc. But, until we get past that, there will be no common ground.

[Kaos]

I just don't understand why there can't be an exchange of ideas and political beliefs without a barrage of insults.

I get it that some people don't understand or can't see the positives that MLK or even Obama may have contributed--because they refuse to see the trees in the forest. That's understandable because some of us can't look beyond our pre-conceived notions about a particular race, culture, etc. But, until we get past that, there will be no common ground.

Not a matter of "preconceived notions about race, culture"

It's a matter of real agendas, real purpose, actual intent behind events that are spun differently. 

MLK was a socialist/communist as is Obama.  They are part of the same master plan that was conceived by socialists and has been implemented for years.  It's the long-view plan and it banks on white guilt. 

I'm sorry, but there IS no common ground.

[AUChizad]

Most don't when it's bad.

It was more a response to wiregrass' smartassed comments that started the whole pow wow (racist I know) which were idiotic. I've still yet to see him support his side with anything other than his own garbage rhetoric and Chizads Wikipedia and snopes articles. If facts fly in the face of the picture perfect angelic image of MLK he was spoon fed, then that's his issue.

Snopes & Wikipedia = "garbage rhetoric".

Your one link to a British tabloid that claims Jackie Kennedy didn't care for MLK and thought he was a sexual deviant, which is completely unrelated to anything I posted, invalidates those lib'ruhl propaganda sites Snopes & Wikipedia.

 

And when did you guys suddenly become such huge fans of the Kennedy's where their opinions and accounts are Gospel truths? And are we saying her husband had no sexual indiscretions? What the fuck does any of this have to do with Communism?

[Saniflush]

I just don't understand why there can't be an exchange of ideas and political beliefs without a barrage of insults.

Fuck you

[WiregrassTiger]

fudge you

You see?

[Kaos]

Monteagle Tennessee.  Look it up.



Fact.

[GH2001]

Monteagle Tennessee.  Look it up.



Fact.

Thats just national inquirer stuff. The man was perfect.  Get over it.

[AUChizad]

Welp. Someone made a photoshop of him with word "Communist" on it.

Can't dispute that hard evidence.

And let me just say, even IF he were a communist, (which he was not, unless you use some loose redneck interpretation that helping a disenfranchised race of people to be equal in the eyes of the law), who really gives a fuck? What does that mean exactly that is so threatening? Rand Paul is associated with some pretty radical motherfuckers in favor of anarchy and in some cases neo-Confederacy, which I imagine you would have no problem with whatsoever. Those are forms of government other than Capitalism. It makes everything Rand Paul stands for invalid? And he actually could be more of a threat to Capitalism considering A) He's not dead and B) He's actually running for office.

Point being...what's YOUR point?

[Saniflush]

Eleanore Roosevelt was a big dyke

A real rug muncher!

[WiregrassTiger]

While MLK is a mortal man, how anyone would reach so far as to label him a communist is beyond me. Am I the only one who sees the commonality in labeling MLK a commy and Obama a socialist without any shred of evidence?