What I believe is that a GROUP of people decides what's best for themselves and their own situation. It has been proven time and again that the smaller the group, the closer to the actual wants of the people get conveyed. In the current form of government the smallest group that would really be able to decide this is by state.
Once again you miss my point, that I truly don't fucking care but it should be left up to individuals or as close to individuals that you can get. There are fucktards on all sides of the political forum that want more government when it suits their needs or interests. All I'm saying is take fucking government out of it as much as you can to begin with.
Which is exactly the argument for legalization.
You're trying to fit your political ideology of limited government, into a place where it doesn't fit, which is by advocating prohibition of a harmless substance which is the height of "nanny state", "big government", "big brother", and everything you don't believe in.
Our country has been systematically lied to for 70+ years about what a dangerous and "immoral" substance marijuana is, thus the fundamentalist Republicans have to oppose, no matter how hypocritical and devoid of logic it may be. I can read you struggling with that as you type, as evidenced by trying to shoehorn an argument that removing laws (federal or state-level) that incarcerate people for using or possessing marijuana is somehow less freedom, and less government overreach than having laws on the books prohibiting it.