Ed Christian and Ladarius Phillips allegedly shot & killed

[JR4AU]

All I know is there is a guy in SC sitting in prison for life after being sentenced to death in one county. Then the trial was retried in another county due to the original venue being determined that the jury pool was tainted in that county. This guy raped and killed a teenaged girl. Yet, he got a new trial because the county he did it in was like Lee county and AU, not enough jurors that had an open mind.

See. This case was not on TV. It was one them real life things that us ignorant unwashed non-cocksucking types notice.  So take your Law and Order hatred and shove it up your ass.

Now you know why folks have contempt for know it all lawyers like you.

In the end, what I suggested is possible. We'll see.

So, do you run your entire life making decisions based on one anecdotal incident that is contrary to the overwhelming majority of cases?  One case?  From SC?  That's what you got?  Srsly?  What you post is more clear evidence that your hatred and contempt for lawyers, law, and the system is grounded in the anomalies, and not the realities.

I'm sitting here browsing through dozens of ALABAMA cases where a Motion for CoV was denied, a conviction had, and upheld by the appellate courts.

[wesfau2]

All I know is there is a guy in SC sitting in prison for life after being sentenced to death in one county. Then the trial was retried in another county due to the original venue being determined that the jury pool was tainted in that county. This guy raped and killed a teenaged girl. Yet, he got a new trial because the county he did it in was like Lee county and AU, not enough jurors that had an open mind.

See. This case was not on TV. It was one them real life things that us ignorant unwashed non-cocksucking types notice.  So take your Law and Order hatred and shove it up your ass.

Now you know why folks have contempt for know it all lawyers like you.

In the end, what I suggested is possible. We'll see.

I love the smell of anecdotal evidence in the morning.

Sure, it's possible, but it's un-fucking-likeley.

Stick to what you know: hating the brown folk.

[AWK]

AWK moved to Houston?

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay!

[Godfather]

Stick to what you know: hating the brown folk.

The just want to go to nurses school and to be loved.

[GH2001]

So, do you run your entire life making decisions based on one anecdotal incident that is contrary to the overwhelming majority of cases?  One case?  From SC?  That's what you got?  Srsly?  What you post is more clear evidence that your hatred and contempt for lawyers, law, and the system is grounded in the anomalies, and not the realities.

I'm sitting here browsing through dozens of ALABAMA cases where a Motion for CoV was denied, a conviction had, and upheld by the appellate courts.

You guys should fuck already.

[War Eagle!!!]

Stick to what you know: hating the brown folk.

I chortled.

[GH2001]

Jurors can even have preconceived notions about his guilt, but if they can tell the court under oath that they can put aside their prejudice, listen to the evidence, and make a ruling based on that and the law, then you can seat an impartial jury.

I was that juror. Even told Judge Walker I had certain notions and beliefs. But also told him I could be objective regardless when I was asked. I was selected out of nearly 200 people that showed up that morning.

[CCTAU]

So, do you run your entire life making decisions based on one anecdotal incident that is contrary to the overwhelming majority of cases? 

Hell yeah I do. When shit happens, it does not matter that it only happened a few times. Only that it happened to you or someone you knew. So even if you great lawyers say it will not happen, one thing we have learned dealing with great lawyers and the law, is that even great lawyers don't know what will happen.

If this does get moved and he gets less of a sentence, then what will the great lawyers say?


I love it when great legal opinion deals in absolutes.

[CCTAU]

I love the smell of anecdotal evidence in the morning.

Sure, it's possible, but it's un-fucking-likeley.

Stick to what you know: hating the brown folk.

Are lawyers brown?

[JR4AU]

Hell yeah I do. When shit happens, it does not matter that it only happened a few times. Only that it happened to you or someone you knew. So even if you great lawyers say it will not happen, one thing we have learned dealing with great lawyers and the law, is that even great lawyers don't know what will happen.

If this does get moved and he gets less of a sentence, then what will the great lawyers say?


I love it when great legal opinion deals in absolutes.

LOL, u r funny.  As Wes stated...possible, but unfucking likely.  I stated a legal opinion.  Your response there is weak.  Very weak.  And you're starting to head off to childish land.

[CCTAU]

LOL, u r funny.  As Wes stated...possible, but unfucking likely.  I stated a legal opinion.  Your response there is weak.  Very weak.  And you're starting to head off to childish land.

Yes. Because anyone who does not agree with the great lawyer/football coach is a child?


I made a statement that the venue would get moved and this guy would not get his like he should and you pulled out your big lawyer penis and started blasting. Maybe you could have allowed for the possibility and stated that it was unlikely, but that is not what you did.

[AUJarhead]

My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts. But there is one thing I do know - when a man like my client slips and falls on a sidewalk in front of a public library, then he is entitled to no less than two million in compensatory damages, and two million in punitive damages. Thank you.

[JR4AU]

Yes. Because anyone who does not agree with the great lawyer/football coach is a child?


I made a statement that the venue would get moved and this guy would not get his like he should and you pulled out your big lawyer penis and started blasting. Maybe you could have allowed for the possibility and stated that it was unlikely, but that is not what you did.

You made the statement it would based on some anecdotal evidence from another state, but I'm waiving my legal penis around to counter with a statement it won't based on Alabama case law, and my legal experience.  You don't soft peddle shit, and I'm not going to soft peddle it to you.  Your legal opinion sux.  The end. The great lawyer hath spoken.

[CCTAU]

You made the statement it would based on some anecdotal evidence from another state, but I'm waiving my legal penis around to counter with a statement it won't based on Alabama case law, and my legal experience.  You don't soft peddle shit, and I'm not going to soft peddle it to you.  Your legal opinion sux.  The end. The great lawyer hath spoken.

If you'll go back and read, I did not state where my opinion came from until later. I made one simple statement and you brought out your tiny lawyer penis (the more you argue, the smaller it gets).



The fact is we both want him to get the maximum he deserves. I am skeptical about it, you seem more sure. I just hope that the prosecutors in charge follow all of the right procedures in order to insure maximum justice. If not, you'll have a lot of legal explaining to do!

[JR4AU]

If you'll go back and read, I did not state where my opinion came from until later. I made one simple statement and you brought out your tiny lawyer penis (the more you argue, the smaller it gets).



The fact is we both want him to get the maximum he deserves. I am skeptical about it, you seem more sure. I just hope that the prosecutors in charge follow all of the right procedures in order to insure maximum justice. If not, you'll have a lot of legal explaining to do!

Hey, I'm not afraid of being wrong!  Ever.  I offer an opinion when I have one, and when I think it's solidly grounded.  Don't know what you do for a living, but unless it's law, or law related, I'd probably ask your opinion on it, rather than give mine because there's a fair chance my opinion would be worthless.  I don't offer opinions on how to program computers or build bridge to our resident gear head and computer nerds, because I only know what little I see as an observer.  My opinion on such matters is worthless.  I don't even offer snags opinions on the civil law side, as my opinion would be only slightly less worthless than yours.   

I don't fear a change of venue.  Even if it got changed, there's no assurance it would be a bad venue for the state.  I do fear facts coming out that might help him get less of a sentence than I think he deserves.  And I'll say this, if he was defending himself, I think he had that right.  He made a stupid choice to fire a gun in a crowd, but if he was absolutely defending himself, he had that right, and it will be tough to reconcile that with innocent bystanders being shot and killed.  I don't even pretend that the case is a slam dunk, but I'd be shocked if venue got changed.  It's just not that kind of case.  Will the motion be filed?  Likely, but I don't see where they could find evidence to support the motion. 

[Godfather]

My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts. But there is one thing I do know - when a man like my client slips and falls on a sidewalk in front of a public library, then he is entitled to no less than two million in compensatory damages, and two million in punitive damages. Thank you.

[CCTAU]

Hey, I'm not afraid of being wrong!  Ever.  I offer an opinion when I have one, and when I think it's solidly grounded.  Don't know what you do for a living, but unless it's law, or law related, I'd probably ask your opinion on it, rather than give mine because there's a fair chance my opinion would be worthless.  I don't offer opinions on how to program computers or build bridge to our resident gear head and computer nerds, because I only know what little I see as an observer.  My opinion on such matters is worthless.  I don't even offer snags opinions on the civil law side, as my opinion would be only slightly less worthless than yours.   

I don't fear a change of venue.  Even if it got changed, there's no assurance it would be a bad venue for the state.  I do fear facts coming out that might help him get less of a sentence than I think he deserves.  And I'll say this, if he was defending himself, I think he had that right.  He made a stupid choice to fire a gun in a crowd, but if he was absolutely defending himself, he had that right, and it will be tough to reconcile that with innocent bystanders being shot and killed.  I don't even pretend that the case is a slam dunk, but I'd be shocked if venue got changed.  It's just not that kind of case.  Will the motion be filed?  Likely, but I don't see where they could find evidence to support the motion.

What an awesome response. You just added a few inches back.

Now if all of your other little brown friends were as nice.

[Snaggletiger]

I say it gets moved




Unless it doesn't




And I have a small lawyer penis

[AWK]

I say it gets moved




Unless it doesn't




And I have a small lawyer penis

Don't sell yourself short, that fucker is 2 inches long, but like a cheese wheel around.

[JR4AU]

What an awesome response. You just added a few inches back.

Now if all of your other little brown friends were as nice.

I thought you enjoyed the back and forth!  Opinion and penis jousting.