Sort of agree....
Auburn ran Oregon off the field (though the scoreboard didn't properly reflect it) because we could match their speed with superior size.
Auburn did not run many SEC teams off the field, because they matched our speed AND size. Auburn caught the SEC after it had a few years to adjust to UF's spread/speed. Without #2 to bail us out with freakish play, that offense wasn't nearly the comeback juggernaut it became.
In other words: an SEC team running the spread can whip the dog piss out of just about any non-SEC team in the nation. It's a brutal combination of size and speed. All things being equal in the SEC, a spread team just doesn't provide the complete mismatch anymore. The scheme has been bested. The trend will turn and one day the spread will work again, but for now it's day is done.
Many coaches believe that if you run something radically different from what the rest of your league runs, you can have some success with lesser players, but it won't last forever.
I can assure you, bammer and LSU present zero surprises to opposing defenses. For that matter neither does Spurrier, Richt or Petrino. In a sense, at least at LSU and Bammer they require more and better players, because they both rely on physically pushing you around. As long as they have big, mature experienced OLs, they can be successful. It's easy to give all the credit to Cam, but Auburn had that ability last season with our OL.