Terrible article for the most part. He even brought up LSU in 2008 (who didn't lose anywhere near as much as we did from their 2007 BCS team). I don't see how that strengthened his point.
I do agree with this part:
If Auburn was simply too young and too thin to stay with the big boys this season, the record could be rationalized, but there are cracks in the foundation of this program.
Consider that the season started with four players, one of them a returning starter, getting arrested and dismissed from the team for their roles in an armed robbery in March, and it'll end with the team's MVP under an indefinite suspension in December.
Dyer's attitude has been an issue all year, but it appears that his actions have gotten him sidelined for at least one game. When your best player has attitude problems, and there's not enough talent surrounding him to cover for it, your team has a serious problem.
Another problem that has been addressed, at last halfway, is the failed three-year marriage of Chizik and Ted Roof on defense. When's the last time an SEC coordinator with a national title on his resume left for a school like Central Florida but not to become a head coach?
Roof got a soft landing, but Chizik is faced with a hard question. Who can he hire that will get Auburn back to playing Auburn defense?
We've had a lot of disciplinary issues that are truly out of Chizik's control, but as we all know, programs are judged by results not excuses.
Also, the defense has been the worst in history. Roof's fault? Probably. But Chizik hired him. And Chizik will have to replace him.