I didn't get to watch, but heard that Cain was bashed pretty hard for the 9-9-9 plan and looked weak, Bachman nailed it, and Romney basically danced around questions and threw out his accomplishments, pimped himself and threw out a bunch of promises as well. Any truth to that?
I felt just the opposite. Cain DID mention 999 a lot but...In Cain's defense, he was invoked a lot in others' responses about the 999 plan. So he had to respond.
Bachmann looked as weak as she ever has IMHO. She is starting to sound like a broken record with the same politician talking points every debate.
Romney was polished as usual. He looked good to me.
Perry - he's done. The condescending facial expressions are getting old. He seemed lost. And contradicted himself 2-3 times. Plus, most of his statements were factually inaccurate.
Hunstman - nice guy but I think way to liberal in some facets to win over the GOP Primary base.
Santorum - guy needs to get off the moral train. You cant legislate morality - someone tell him this.
Paul - I understand his message on the Fed and he is correct. But he is seriously flawed in how he conveys his message. He comes across looking like a moonbat as Tarheel says. He has no shot.
Newt - I think would make a great economic advisor or VP. Super high economic IQ. I enjoy listening to him. But he has no shot and he knows it.