TCU to Big XII

wesfau2 · « **on:** October 06, 2011, 11:19:25 AM »

Per Tim Brando, citing CBS Sports.

Snaggletiger · « **Reply #1 on:** October 06, 2011, 11:23:56 AM »

But Marsha, I thought we were going to the dance.

Something suddenly came up.

Kaos · « **Reply #2 on:** October 06, 2011, 11:45:51 AM »

SEC gets Mizzou. Big 12 gets TCU.

Somebody got fucked. It rhymes with us.

AWK · « **Reply #3 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:11:04 PM »

The only way I would want Missouri to join the SEC is if they let us fuck their women...

Saniflush · « **Reply #4 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:13:23 PM »

Quote from: AWK on October 06, 2011, 01:11:04 PM

The only way I would want Missouri to join the SEC is if they let us fuck their women...

Since when does the King ask for permission?

Kaos · « **Reply #5 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:16:01 PM »

Quote from: AWK on October 06, 2011, 01:11:04 PM

The only way I would want Missouri to join the SEC is if they let us fuck their women...

You can have the one second from left in the above shot.

This is apparently the best Mizzou has to offer.

The one in blue with the hat suits me. I'll take that one. Ya'll can divvy up the rest.

Kaos · « **Reply #6 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:20:27 PM »

A curious side note.

Missouri is 6-1 against teams in the SEC (at the time the games were played) since 1980. I assume those are all bowls, but I found that to be a strange statistic.

Saniflush · « **Reply #7 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:35:56 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on October 06, 2011, 01:20:27 PM

A curious side note.

Missouri is 6-1 against teams in the SEC (at the time the games were played) since 1980. I assume those are all bowls, but I found that to be a strange statistic.

I also find it strange that they lost to Troy.

GH2001 · « **Reply #8 on:** October 06, 2011, 01:54:36 PM »

I find it strange that they are 150-400 all time.

Ok, its not really that bad, but its bad enough NOT to be a member of the SEC.

DnATL · « **Reply #9 on:** October 06, 2011, 02:00:44 PM »

Quote from: Kaos on October 06, 2011, 01:20:27 PM

A curious side note.

Missouri is 6-1 against teams in the SEC (at the time the games were played) since 1980. I assume those are all bowls, but I found that to be a strange statistic.

Looking back at their schedules, it looks like they beat Miss St twice in a home-and-home series in 81 & 84 (81 game in Jackson, with MSU ranked #9?), lost to Arkansas in Shreveport after 03 season, beat USC in Shreveport after 05 season, beat Ole Miss twice in a home-and-home series in 06 & 07 (07 at Ole Miss, same year that Missouri ended 12-2), and beat Arkansas in Cotton Bowl after 07 season

There is longer history starting on page 54 - they have more wins than losses against AU, UAT, LSU, and Florida - never played UT despite a common border:
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/miss/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2011-12/misc_non_event/FBRecordBook-2011.pdf

Kaos · « **Reply #10 on:** October 06, 2011, 02:06:18 PM »

Quote from: DnATL on October 06, 2011, 02:00:44 PM

Looking back at their schedules, it looks like they beat Miss St twice in a home-and-home series in 81 & 84 (81 game in Jackson, with MSU ranked #9?), lost to Arkansas in Shreveport after 03 season, beat USC in Shreveport after 05 season, beat Ole Miss twice in a home-and-home series in 06 & 07 (07 at Ole Miss, same year that Missouri ended 12-2), and beat Arkansas in Cotton Bowl after 07 season

There is longer history starting on page 54 - they have more wins than losses against AU, UAT, LSU, and Florida - never played UT despite a common border:
http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/miss/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2011-12/misc_non_event/FBRecordBook-2011.pdf

So if they join the SEC, I won't have to hear "Allarbammer done got a winnin' record ginst EVER team in tha SEC?"

If that's the case?

WELCOME MIZZOU!

AUJarhead · « **Reply #11 on:** October 06, 2011, 02:27:22 PM »

Nah, they'll just add

"*minimum of 20 games played against each other."

GH2001 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 06, 2011, 03:44:45 PM »

Where they rank all time:

34 Missouri 0.54331 620 517 52 1189
35 Mississippi 0.56327 619 476 35 1130
36 Virginia 0.52796 618 550 48 1216
37 Utah 0.59057 617 423 31 1071
38t Maryland 0.53114 610 536 42 1188
38t Rutgers 0.50399 610 600 42 1252

Right up there with Ole Miss. They have 1 more win than Ole Miss and 30 more losses. Except they probably didn't face near the caliber of teams during this stretch. Do we really want another Ole Miss or lesser??

JR4AU · « **Reply #13 on:** October 06, 2011, 03:51:41 PM »

Quote from: GH2001 on October 06, 2011, 03:44:45 PM

Where they rank all time:

34 Missouri 0.54331 620 517 52 1189
35 Mississippi 0.56327 619 476 35 1130
36 Virginia 0.52796 618 550 48 1216
37 Utah 0.59057 617 423 31 1071
38t Maryland 0.53114 610 536 42 1188
38t Rutgers 0.50399 610 600 42 1252

Right up there with Ole Miss. They have 1 more win than Ole Miss and 30 more losses. Except they probably didn't face near the caliber of teams during this stretch. Do we really want another Ole Miss or lesser??

Thats abour 70 more wins all time than USCe

GH2001 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 06, 2011, 03:52:55 PM »

Quote from: JR4AU on October 06, 2011, 03:51:41 PM

Thats abour 70 more wins all time than USCe

And I think I said in a thread last week that I wasn't (and still am not) crazy about them either.

JR4AU · « **Reply #15 on:** October 06, 2011, 03:55:23 PM »

Quote from: GH2001 on October 06, 2011, 03:52:55 PM

And I think I said in a thread last week that I wasn't (and still am not) crazy about them either.

Name a conf. with no weak teams. Name one with more contenders than the SEC. Just sayin'.

GH2001 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 06, 2011, 03:57:51 PM »

Quote from: JR4AU on October 06, 2011, 03:55:23 PM

Name a conf. with no weak teams. Name one with more contenders than the SEC. Just sayin'.

That's true. But we already have our USCe, Miss St and Ole Miss.

Kentucky gets a huge pass here due to being probably the best BB program of all time.

But point being, we are at our limit of having mediocre programs. Mizzou would be just one more. Fuck them. If we are gonna add another team it's needs to be more strongly considered than just adding Mizzou.

JR4AU · « **Reply #17 on:** October 06, 2011, 04:02:08 PM »

Quote from: GH2001 on October 06, 2011, 03:57:51 PM

That's true. But we already have our USCe, Miss St and Ole Miss.

Kentucky gets a huge pass here due to being probably the best BB program of all time.

But point being, we are at our limit of having mediocre programs. Mizzou would be just one more. Fuck them. If we are gonna add another team it's needs to be more strongly considered than just adding Mizzou.

Can't disagree, but they aint gonna hurt nothin' either.

AU_Tiger_2000 · « **Reply #18 on:** October 06, 2011, 04:41:10 PM »

Quote from: GH2001 on October 06, 2011, 03:44:45 PM

Where they rank all time:

34 Missouri 0.54331 620 517 52 1189
35 Mississippi 0.56327 619 476 35 1130
36 Virginia 0.52796 618 550 48 1216
37 Utah 0.59057 617 423 31 1071
38t Maryland 0.53114 610 536 42 1188
38t Rutgers 0.50399 610 600 42 1252

Right up there with Ole Miss. They have 1 more win than Ole Miss and 30 more losses. Except they probably didn't face near the caliber of teams during this stretch. Do we really want another Ole Miss or lesser??

Well if we're going to add a team I would rather another Ole Miss than another LSU or Florida. Do you really want someone who would compete with us on the field and in recruiting?

GH2001 · « **Reply #19 on:** October 07, 2011, 09:29:42 AM »

Quote from: AU_Tiger_2000 on October 06, 2011, 04:41:10 PM

Well if we're going to add a team I would rather another Ole Miss than another LSU or Florida. Do you really want someone who would compete with us on the field and in recruiting?

Yes. Most good teams already do - ie - FSU.

They would just be in a different conference.