What I am saying is that, whether there is evidence or not, these guys are the bottom of the gutter crap peddlers. If they find something with evidence, then fine. But when they don't have any, they will just make shit up and imply. They don't need evidence, it's just icing to them. They are both pieces of shit IMHO. Even National Enquirer gets it right once in a while. So did Jerry Springer.
Pointing out suspicious or questionable behavior and circumstances is hardly shitty journalism. It's not Putzlighter Prize winning, but if all the pictures are factual, if the circumstances are that Trent and his family never had a pot to piss in until he got to bammer, then suddenly they're like Weezie and George, then it needs to be questioned. Could there be a legit answer for it all? Yes, but who fucking knows. Are Brooks and Travis ethical journalist? Fuck no, but even a shitbag finds a real story now and then. All the pics of vehicles, suits, T Town Tom, etc are evidence of nothing...yet. They reveal things that are clearly suspicious.
And we all know how if this were Auburn players, Finesuckmycockbaum would have no trouble at all "understanding it". We all know that the local media would be tipping the national media to help it get bigger legs.
It is what it is.