I could deal with VT.
A&M will probably be on par with the Mississippi schools, at least for a while. Better than the Eastern doormats (UK & Vandy), but not by much.
I like it for the big-picture.
A) They are well-rounded in all sports. Pretty good basketball & baseball teams.
B) Opens up the state of Tejas to the SEC. TV markets, blah blah.
C) As a result of B, I think their football team will eventually become the premiere team in their state. Much like UF eclipsed FSU & Miami. And they've got a hell of a recruiting base to work with. That will actually hurt other SEC teams, although I don't think that negative effect will be too detrimental.
However, I don't like shaking up what I feel is pretty much the only perfect institution in college football, which is the current SEC divisions & interdivision rivals. The east has been kind of weak as of late, but that's a cyclical thing. Adding two more western teams won't help. Adding 1 more western team is even worse. Fucks up the whole balance.
If they add two more teams from the west, what happens? We'll likely move.
I'm fine with that. Our division rival can be Alabama, and we can still play them and UGA every year.
But what does that do to Bama? They'd have to choose between us and UT. Assuming they go with us, UT will have to take one of the West Teams. I guess UGA gets the other? It'll cause some chaos for sure. Won't fit as well, IMO.
Adding VT is about the only way I can see this making sense...