Tigers X - Number one Source to Talk Auburn Tigers Sports

Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft

jmar

  • ****
  • 10632
Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« on: February 24, 2011, 04:18:18 PM »
Too cocky!

But as I said after the NCG. BUFFALO BILLS

No skreets, no inside information just good ol gut feeling yall.     

And Todd McShay just said Julio Jones will run a faster forty than Mark Ingram. Yeah... in the high 4.4 range. I can't believe that, maybe at a 100 yds. but in the 40?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2011, 04:25:52 PM »
I could see that.  Ingram did get run down a few times.  I never watched enough of Alabama to see how fast Julio really was, every time I watched he was just blocking.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You meet a man on the Oregon Trail. He tells you his name is Terry. You laugh and tell him: "That's a girl's name!" Terry shoots you. You have died of dissin' Terry.

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2011, 04:43:22 PM »
Too cocky!

But as I said after the NCG. BUFFALO BILLS

No skreets, no inside information just good ol gut feeling yall.     

And Todd McShay just said Julio Jones will run a faster forty than Mark Ingram. Yeah... in the high 4.4 range. I can't believe that, maybe at a 100 yds. but in the 40?

I've heard more than one say he's going to the Bills, including one that says he heard it fro a Bills coach.

  But the combine could change things.

I assure you wholeo is faster than Ingram.  Ingram will go 4.5ish, and wholeo 4.4ish
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

jmar

  • ****
  • 10632
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2011, 04:54:04 PM »
I've heard more than one say he's going to the Bills, including one that says he heard it fro a Bills coach.

  But the combine could change things.

I assure you wholeo is faster than Ingram.  Ingram will go 4.5ish, and wholeo 4.4ish
Then doesn't that mean Jones is faster than AJ Green? That surprises me too. Must be some sort of stealth technology.

Dilfer says Cam has it all.
And Buffalo needs a big draw.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2011, 05:11:29 PM »
Then doesn't that mean Jones is faster than AJ Green? That surprises me too. Must be some sort of stealth technology.

Dilfer says Cam has it all.
And Buffalo needs a big draw.

How'd AJ Greene come in to this?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

jmar

  • ****
  • 10632
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2011, 05:20:27 PM »
Not much except that he has timed in at 4.49. Green might have quicker hands than Julio though.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2011, 05:30:17 PM »
Not much except that he has timed in at 4.49. Green might have quicker hands than Julio though.

Timed by who and what?  Where?  What surface?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

jmar

  • ****
  • 10632
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2011, 05:38:01 PM »
Timed by who and what?  Where?  What surface?
by his Mom, on a stove timer in their kitchen on formica?
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2011, 06:13:50 PM »
by his Mom, on a stove timer in their kitchen on formica?

Exactly.  When the combine times as re posted, then we'll know.   

Rivals has a kid I know listed as a 4.35.  Im here to tell you, thats a load of shit.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

jmar

  • ****
  • 10632
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2011, 06:27:37 PM »
Exactly.  When the combine times as re posted, then we'll know.   

Rivals has a kid I know listed as a 4.35.  Im here to tell you, thats a load of shit.
Sure and I regularly hear of NFL corners running 4.6's We discussed how relative to the who, what...already haven't we?
Remember ...we talked Bo, Alexander Wright, D. Sanders etc.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

RWS

  • ****
  • 6053
  • The guy your mother warned you about
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2011, 12:09:41 PM »
Not much except that he has timed in at 4.49. Green might have quicker hands than Julio though.
Julio just ran a 4.43 on his first run, and a 4.39 on the second run. AJ Green ran 4.48 on the first run, and 4.51 on the second. I agree with JR though, no way Ingram runs better than Julio.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

"You're too stupid to realize that I'm one of the levelheaded Auburn fans around here" - The Prowler

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2011, 12:19:40 PM »
Julio just ran a 4.43 on his first run, and a 4.39 on the second run. AJ Green ran 4.48 on the first run, and 4.51 on the second. I agree with JR though, no way Ingram runs better than Julio.

Boom.
I've heard more than one say he's going to the Bills, including one that says he heard it fro a Bills coach.

  But the combine could change things.

I assure you wholeo is faster than Ingram.  Ingram will go 4.5ish, and wholeo 4.4ish
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2011, 03:56:35 PM »
Ingram went 4.58.

Cam went 4.58 as well.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

RWS

  • ****
  • 6053
  • The guy your mother warned you about
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2011, 04:12:39 PM »
Ingram went 4.58.

Cam went 4.58 as well.
Ingram's official was 4.62. 4.58 was the unofficial. However, Ingram did a 1.53 in the 10 yard split, which is pretty good.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

"You're too stupid to realize that I'm one of the levelheaded Auburn fans around here" - The Prowler

Kaos

  • *
  • 29535
  • It's GO time
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2011, 04:39:19 PM »
Ingram's official was 4.62. 4.58 was the unofficial. However, Ingram did a 1.53 in the 10 yard split, which is pretty good.

That's not really good. 

I always thought he was a little slow.   

40 times aren't everything, but that could hurt him. 

Mario -- our slow guy -- nuked him, by the way.  If he's running a 4.38?  Onterrio must be putting in a 3.14. 
« Last Edit: February 27, 2011, 04:42:33 PM by Kaos »
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

RWS

  • ****
  • 6053
  • The guy your mother warned you about
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2011, 04:45:26 PM »
That's not really good. 

I always thought he was a little slow.   

40 times aren't everything, but that could hurt him.
I agree, but I think everybody was (or should have been) expecting that . He never really was a break away from the pack or make you miss in space type guy in college. I think his value is more so in yards after contact. But, that was in college too. I'm not so sure he's just going to bounce off guys in the NFL. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

"You're too stupid to realize that I'm one of the levelheaded Auburn fans around here" - The Prowler

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2011, 04:47:16 PM »
That's not really good. 

I always thought he was a little slow.   

40 times aren't everything, but that could hurt him. 

Mario -- our slow guy -- nuked him, by the way.  If he's running a 4.38?  Onterrio must be putting in a 3.14.

The Sporting News said his quick 10 yd split was impressive enough to overcome the 40 time.  Good burst, good vision and instincts mean more to a back of his style. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2011, 04:58:49 PM »
I didnt even realize M. Fannin got a combine invite.  He ran the 4th fastest 40 at 4.38.  Thats putting distance between him and the ball he drops in a hurry.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Kaos

  • *
  • 29535
  • It's GO time
    • No, YOU Move!
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2011, 05:00:55 PM »
I didnt even realize M. Fannin got a combine invite.  He ran the 4th fastest 40 at 4.38.  Thats putting distance between him and the ball he drops in a hurry.

It also allows him to get separation out of the backfield so more touchdown passes can sail to the turf. 
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If you want free cheese, look in a mousetrap.

JR4AU

  • ****
  • 9989
Re: Cam Ruled Ineligible for NFL Draft
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2011, 05:07:09 PM »
It also allows him to get separation out of the backfield so more touchdown passes can sail to the turf.

Sadly for him, his fumblitis cost him millions.  Good size, world class speed, and drops balls like they're diseased.
friendly
0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions