Your article appears to say that Tebow won the Heisman the same year he won the national championship.
Newton seems to have a lock on the 2010 Heisman Trophy, while Tebow took the Heisman in 2007. Newton and the Auburn Tigers are going to the 2010 BCS National Championship, while Tebow led the Florida Gators to the 2007 BCS National Championship.
Also, are you comparing Tebow's Heisman season to Cam's 2010 season? Might want to edit in a spot that clarifies that.
One thing that won't be measured is Cam's worth to this Auburn team.
I think Tebow was a great college football player, and he definitely deserves to be placed in that special group of legendary players. On the other hand, Tebow was surrounded by stellar talent and was starting for a team expected to win championships.
Cam is, to be honest, surrounded by not-so-NFL-ready football players. Cam's value is very hard to measure, and the only way to measure his worth is by how many wins Auburn has. Without Cam, how many losses does Auburn have? Miss St? Kentucky? Arkansas? LSU? Georgia? Alabama? Clemson? South Carolina Part Uno?
Can you definitively state that Auburn had other players on offense to lead them over those teams? Were we not close to a 5-7 season? Did we not watch Cam single handedly make big plays to help Auburn go over the top of some very tough opponents? Also, you have to factor in how many adjustments defenses have to make just to cover Cam. That opens up lanes for the other offensive players to be successful.
Also, Tebow was loved and referred by everyone in college football. Everyone wanted to see him succeed unless your team was on Florida's schedule. Cam has overcome adversity that no eligible football player should go through, and he did it with a smile on his face.
So while I respect and admire Tim Tebow, I don't think he's anywhere near the caliber of Cam Newton.
Oh and by the way, have your dog assume the position.