Well, it DOES matter. Getting free tickets to games? Convincing players that can play that they can't and offering "same perks as players" to them?
How do you know those players could still play? Did you evaluate their medical charts? Both stated they were injured but neither said they passed the team physical. Griffin was quoted as saying he didn't dispute the failed physical. Chuck admits to having a back problem but wanted to play through it.
Why does the fact she's a Duke graduate have to do with anything? Duke? So Duke is a school out to get Bama now? What about the other guy that wrote the article? Did he come from a University that has some sort of problem with Alabama too?
C'mon, the whole "they graduated from *_____________*, so they must have an issue with Alabama defense is retarded.
You asked why the WSJ published the article. My answer was, maybe the author had a beef with Saban. Then we learn the author is a graduate of a school who had their ass handed to them by Alabama a week ago. Not only did they get their ass handed to them, but Alabama's backup quarterback was throwing for the endzone in the 2 minute drill before halftime, while up by 40.
I could see where that could piss someone off. Is it the reason the author wrote the article? Seems plausible, and you seemed real interested in getting an answer.
The article was written because the issues are not standard, everyday, okay happenings in a football program. It's shit like this that's going to get the unwanted attention brought to Alabama.
Never mind. You already knew the answer. Had you just stated this from the beginning instead of asking "why, why, why", you could have saved me the time of googling the author's name.
Call it reporters doing what reporters do if you want, but reporters doing what reporters do is ultimately what's going to earn Saban and Alabama a kick in the cash and prizes.
When the right person digs in the right spot and finally finds some substantial allegations against Saban or Alabama cheating, that's a very real possibility. But this ain't the article.